Channel
@nanning004
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,064subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003015376253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nanning004 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nanning004 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 4,064 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 4,056 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,224 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：鱼丸 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：10 【颜值得分】：10 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-12 02:58:24 【过程描述】：已经出击两次了，熟悉的流程，也是熟悉的面孔，已经少了几分陌生，能洽淡许多了哈哈，嫩妹一枚，喜欢嫩妹的兄弟们无脑冲，值得返吃！ 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：海棠 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：10 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-12 00:40:39 【过程描述】：今天刚到南宁，询问老师是否有空，约好时间地点后便出发。到达课室非常干净清爽，老师也很热情，课表上的服务全都有。过程就是洗漱完毕享受老师的顶级服务，然后123洗漱更衣。有一说一老师的服务质量和态度确实顶级，情绪价值给的也很到位，很有恋爱的感觉。值得回锅，改日再战！ 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：海棠 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：9 【环境得分】：9 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 23:34:21 【过程描述】：一见面就看见海棠那丰满的线条了，大🐻呼之欲出啊。陪浴很好，也有水中萧。床上服务：毒龙很舒服 时间很长，正面真的很爽。口交差点被吸出来。 受不了，带上T出击，老师水很多，传教士起手，然后后入 跟狼友说的一样 屁股真的很大，还有臀浪，太舒服了 换到老师在上面 全自动榨汁机 最后抱着老师发射了。真的太舒服了 性价比极高 服务也好 还很健谈老师 强烈推荐 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：OPOP 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：10 【颜值得分】：10 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 23:01:19 【过程描述】：挺好的 不错的体验 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：大大 【老师花名】：秦悠悠 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：10 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：9 【服务得分】：9 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：8 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 22:58:22 【过程描述】：到群里看到老师.还是新人一时兴起就联系了老师.开门的一瞬间.老师穿的包臀裙给人感觉身材超级棒.前凸后翘.老师很热情 付了水费 老师贴心的给我脱衣服，然后一起去洗澡.洗完澡出来还贴心地给我擦干.去了床上.开始调情.老师很主动 屁股和视频里面一样很翘，不得不说了.这次来的很对 搞得很舒服. 宝马身材.特别满意. 【综合评价】：优 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：塔姆 （半步上岸境） 【老师花名】：橘子 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：10 【身材得分】：9 【服务得分】：9 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 22:42:36 【过程描述】：相逢一场梦，梦醒两空空。 也是好久没得工兵了，抢到工兵后马上和老师约好时间就出击。在老师的遥控下上去了，进门看到老师挺高的170这样，胸大概B这样，嫩妹一枚，有纹身，然后老师课室很宽敞，两张床在里面，交了水费就洗澡了，🐻粉粉的还挺好看，洗澡也挺认真。洗完澡🐔就硬硬嘟，马上带上安全帽长枪直入，老师下面满紧，桩了一会后抱着老师猛猛冲刺，也是完成了本次任务。总结：老师服务还不错，服务认真不摸鱼，人照对版人照差不多9分这样，和视频差不多，但是本人我觉得好看点。很好吃，考虑返食 【综合评价】：棒 …
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：杨柳 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 22:33:38 【过程描述】：老师态度非常好，进去后交水费洗澡，身材是我喜欢的，微胖届天花板，屁股很丰满，毛很多，胸很大且不下垂。老师服务非常到位。AB面都有服务，一般这个价位很少有ab面，口了一下后带上小雨伞，来了女上位，老师一边强奸我一边大蟒🐍，然后换了后入出水，体验非常好 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：嘎嘎滴辣虾 【老师花名】：乔安 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：9 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：9 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 21:03:04 【过程描述】：偶然发现老师之前的一个报告，于是决定联系老师。消息回复很快，定好时间后，原本只打算1p的但看频道视频觉得老师挺合眼的就决定从p增到pp。到开课那天，提前十分钟到楼下，遥控开门后就看到了老师本人——轻熟少妇，皮肤白嫩，丰满身材，和视频里的样子几乎一致，确实是我喜欢的那一款。老师很热情，递拖鞋、脱衣，带我进浴室，还让我慢点小心滑。热水下她全身贴着我，认真又温柔地帮我洗，每一下都滑溜溜的，丰满的胸部不时蹭到我身上，我下边逐渐硬了起来。洗完后老师让我躺床上，她主动骑上来，开始舔我胸前两个点，然后开始给我口活，在…
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：周柏豪 🥰 【老师花名】：可欣 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：8 【颜值得分】：8 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：9 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：8 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 20:20:26 【过程描述】：老师很健谈，身材很好很有料，水多多。课表上的都有做到，课中施法被意外打断，解决后老师又让我重整旗鼓，很舒服的一次出击。 【综合评价】：优 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：椰子 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：10 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：9 【服务得分】：9 【态度得分】：9 【环境得分】：9 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 17:53:16 【过程描述】：这几天出师不利，跑男了好几个老师，万念俱灰之际，看到椰子头像亮着小蓝点，就问了一句开不开，不一会回了我，开，马上约好时间，收拾行囊，立即出发，见面还是熟悉的味道，好久不见感觉更漂亮了，胸更大更软了，今天还发现屁股开始有肉了，好好捏，完事还想加1p，可惜后面有兄弟等着了，只能恋恋不舍的离开，出门一扫之前阴霾，满血复活了，只能说椰子永远是迷茫时候的不二之选👍 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
❤1
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：夜不归宿 【老师花名】：OPOP 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：10 【颜值得分】：10 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：10 【态度得分】：10 【环境得分】：10 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 06:10:29 【过程描述】：老师风采依旧，但包夜还是太累了，二弟已经燃尽了。 【综合评价】：棒 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
南宁科技大学修车老师榜单 南宁科技大学修车公开群 南宁科技大学修车出击表 【验证留名】：匿名 【老师花名】：悦悦 【联系老师】：👉点击直达老师👈 【人照得分】：9 【颜值得分】：9 【身材得分】：10 【服务得分】：9 【态度得分】：9 【环境得分】：9 【验证时间】：2026-08-11 02:52:14 【过程描述】：终于有空可以写一下悦悦老师的车评了，老师重庆妹子，肤白貌美大长腿，人照合一，女上位的时候一对大灯在你面前摇晃，视觉冲击力拉满，可惜没有🐍吻，对我这种🐍教中人缺少了一定体验感。不过老师整体还是很好的，值得推荐。 【综合评价】：优 【预约截图】：已上传 【报告提交】：@xiuchennbot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nanning004. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 394,504 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南宁科技大学出击表” (@nanning004), 4,064 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanning004.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.