Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нанылкин ジ

Channel

Нанылкин ジ

@nanilkin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,574subscribers

+800 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002041160996
TypeChannel
Username@nanilkin
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/nanilkin

Growth

18,77419,57419,1747 August 2026 — 18,774 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,779 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,823 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,839 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,897 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,978 subscribers15 August 2026 — 19,174 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,342 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,574 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +800. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,654–19,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 23:3419,574+232
16 Aug 2026, 21:2619,342+168
15 Aug 2026, 12:1519,174+196
14 Aug 2026, 01:4618,978+81
12 Aug 2026, 17:5618,897+34
11 Aug 2026, 19:1118,863+24
10 Aug 2026, 22:0118,839+16
9 Aug 2026, 21:1218,823+18
8 Aug 2026, 18:0818,805+26
7 Aug 2026, 19:3318,779+5
7 Aug 2026, 16:4518,774first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.7%
avg views ÷ 19,574 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,800
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held38 (24 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total220,570
Reactions total13,607
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13,607 reactions across 38 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6,48547.7%
❤‍🔥1,58911.7%
👍1,36710.0%
🔥8936.56%
😱6774.98%
😭6374.68%
👌3402.50%
🥰2211.62%
2191.61%
🍓1991.46%
💘1611.18%
1601.18%
😢1130.83%
💔820.603%
🤣590.434%
🎉510.375%
👏480.353%
🍌360.265%
🤯310.228%
👀300.22%
33 further kinds2091.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,607reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
528
across the posts below
Posts paid on
30
of 38 we hold a reading for · 79%
Most on one post
402
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nanilkin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC≈2,260 views357 reactions51 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

хочу на мальдивы (на картинке не мальдивы)

275❤‍🔥36🔥26🎉6💘522🍓2

16 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈3,140 views333 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

и ничего они не золотые, врут всё.

❤‍🔥26037💘22🍓3🔥322🍌2

16 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈3,280 views337 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

щас отдыхаю в небольшом городке эйнджел-пайн. хорошее местечко, виды видные очень даже.

263🔥29👍19💘7🤪54🍓4😈3

16 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈3,640 views389 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

сегодня выходной, отсыпаемся.

296❤‍🔥40🎉30💘9🍓4🔥3😱3🐳2

15 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,940 views272 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

в целом хорошо посидели, думаю надо взять за правило стримить разговорник на ютубах в конце недели. основные стримы планирую возобновлять на твиче, скорее всего буду перестраиваться под вечернее время (а может и нет, хз). сейчас думаю достроить домик в майнкрафте, потом аукцион (за баллы) сделать на игру, и уже нормально играть в игршки.

👍17857❤‍🔥234🍓4💘2🔥21

15 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC≈4,320 views727 reactions5 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

ладно, всем пока =(

😭59055😱34💔1311😨9💘5🍓4

15 Aug 2026, 04:03 UTC≈4,350 views343 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

проснулся, гроза ебошит на улице, я испугался, со страху под одеялом сижу. но это неважно, в прошлый раз мы очень круто постримили 5 минут, потому что то ли ютуб душит, то ли у меня интернет говнил. сейчас все норм, попробую снова вечером подрубить, авось и получится посидеть =)

265🔥35😱22💘5❤‍🔥3🍓3🎉32

14 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈4,290 views225 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

НОВОЕ ВИДЕО ВЫШЛО, ВСЕМ ГЛЯДИШКУ ДЕЛАТЬ, САЖУСЬ В ТЮРЯЧКУ =) https://youtu.be/MjwZRjFRaNw https://youtu.be/MjwZRjFRaNw https://youtu.be/MjwZRjFRaNw

170😱2418💘3🔥3🍓2🗿21

14 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈4,260 views290 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

всем доброе утро, сижу видос почти доделал, сегодня выйдет.

23625👍13🍓5❤‍🔥3🎉3💘31

13 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC≈4,490 views353 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

даже у ИгроМакСа стрим упал, ебаный ютуб душит молодых талантов.

😱261😢44💔24103😍3😭3🍓2

13 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈4,440 views335 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

короче я проклят, именно сегодня хотел аккуратненько постримить, в итоге ютуб кажет - иди на хуй, твич кажет - иди на хуй. стримы оффаются, битрейт скачет, я лох, всем пока.

❤‍🔥238😢5624👍43🍓3🫡3🍾1

13 Aug 2026, 03:55 UTC≈4,730 views379 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

режим сна был восстановлен, зачем - непонятно...

312❤‍🔥30🍓18💘7👍4🔥431

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @nanilkin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@nanilkin edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 August 2026

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нанылкин ジ” (@nanilkin), 19,574 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanilkin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.