Channel
@nanhangbaogao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004296837070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nanhangbaogao |
| Created | 8 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nanhangbaogao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 8 | +3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:23 | 5 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 5 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 3 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (8 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 869 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：9.13 【出击人ID】：kunmercy 【老师艺名】：02南航 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：万达 【茶费次数】：700p 【人照相似】：95（满分100） 【目测年龄】：23 【颜值妆造】：95（满分100） 【身材曲线】：95（满分100） 【乳房状态】：b+ 【臀部形态】：大翘（小巧/大翘） 【皮肤状态】：白（肤色/质感） 【bb的状态】：湿（户型/紧湿度） 【服务评分】：95（满分100） 【情绪价值】：95（满分100） 【日☀后感/详细描述】：初见老师，眼前一亮，好久没见到颜值高的，穿着黄色连衣裙，身材也修饰得很好。173高度，苗条奶大，前凸后翘。交完水费，帮洗完后，主动舔主动口。硬了直接进入正题，换了几个姿势，老师上位耐力很好。平时都是得自己动太累，第一次有老师在…
写报告拿积分⭐抽大奖获取 ❤萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗ 【出击日期】：9.10 【出击人ID】：zqh 【老师艺名】：02南航 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：万达 【茶费次数】：600p 【人照相似】：100（满分100） 【目测年龄】：23 【颜值妆造】：100（满分100） 【身材曲线】：100（满分100） 【乳房状态】：大，人造，但是做的很好（大小/真假） 【臀部形态】：大翘（小巧/大翘） 【皮肤状态】：白（肤色/质感） 【bb的状态】：湿（户型/紧湿度） 【服务评分】：100（满分100） 【情绪价值】：100（满分100） 【日☀后感/详细描述】：万达公寓环境有点老旧了，床会响，美中不足。进入公寓，初见老师，老师颜值超乎想象，很高，穿着修身连衣裙。进房后，褪下衣服，大奶，顶级身材，有173高度，又苗条，前凸后翘。然后帮洗后，A面服务，摸不…
写报告拿积分⭐️抽大奖获取 ❤️萝卜青菜各有所爱，出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点，请各位自行斟酌考量❗️ 【出击日期】：2026-9-7 【出击人ID】：Frederek engel 【老师艺名】：南航空姐 【客服账号】：@fujianjingpin 【城市地区】：厦门湖里区 【茶费次数】：7/P 【人照相似】：85（满分100） 【目测年龄】：30-35 【颜值妆造】：85 颧骨略高 （满分100） 【身材曲线】：85（满分100） 【乳房状态】：C 应该是人工出来的（大小/真假） 【臀部形态】：大 （小巧/大翘） 【皮肤状态】：白 （肤色/质感） 【bb的状态】：有点松 湿（户型/紧湿度） 【服务评分】：70（满分100） 【情绪价值】：70（满分100） 【日☀️后感/详细描述】：（不低于五十字，内容补充，可描过程表现，服务细节，优缺点，房间环境等） 1、优点：颜值不错，口活好 非常会舔 ；女上姿势很会动；皮肤…
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @nanhangbaogao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“南航报告” (@nanhangbaogao), 8 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nanhangbaogao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.