Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ڕەگاژۆ

@namopoem

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,476subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001053633739
TypeChannel
Username@namopoem
CreatedBetween 1 June 2016 and 30 November 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/namopoem

Growth

3,4293,4763,452.55 August 2026 — 3,430 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,430 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,429 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,453 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,476 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,422–3,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:583,476+23
9 Aug 2026, 17:423,453+24
6 Aug 2026, 18:103,429-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:373,430no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:223,430first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 6 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.62%
avg views ÷ 3,476 subscribers
Avg views / post
126
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.826%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (6 November 20257 August 2026)
Views total378
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 57s
Average length
5m 19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4685.2%
👎35.56%
👍23.70%
👏23.70%
🔥11.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC15 viewsread 7 August 2026

سلاو #بەخێربێن_ئاڵوگۆڕ_کوردستان بۆ بەشداری لە لیست⬇️ @KORDVARE55 🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿🌿 کانال کلیپ و آهنگ جوان کوردی @dfhjnjkmm هه‌وارگه‌ی دڵان @masazh000 غم دلم @zccfvbnn موزیک وکلیپ کوردی @dangstan2 نیشتمان جوان @nishtimanakmm هەناسەی سارد @hanasaysard زامه کانم @zamekanm ڪانال مانگ واستیرە @mang_asterh سقز موزیکال @saqezmusicaI ڕ.ش هاوڕاز ... (سکڵــــی دڵ) @Skllidll2 کاناڵی ڕەسمی هونەرمەند محمد گشندرەای @mohammad_shndra

30 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC202 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

شاره‌که‌ی من شاره‌که‌ی من، شاره‌ خنجیلانه‌که‌ی من، شاری بێشکه‌ی خه‌ونه‌کانی منداڵێتیم. هاتوومه‌وه‌، چل ساڵێکی، سه‌ر نیوه‌ ماش و برنجی. پڕ له‌ شکۆی کریستاڵی هه سته‌کانی منداڵێتیم. تەژی بۆنی کاگڵی دیواره‌کانت. ڕۆژی باران. پڕله کۆمای به‌فری نێو کۆڵانه‌ کانت، به‌ ڕێبه‌ندان. تەژی هه‌موو وه‌رزه‌کانت. هاتوومه‌وه‌، تا جارێ تر بشنێمه‌وه‌، به‌ده‌م شنه‌ی شه‌وباته‌وه‌. به‌ده‌م که‌روێشکه‌ی ئاوه‌نیای، باڵاکردووی مه‌زراته‌وه‌. به‌

2

30 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC161 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تۆ ماوەیەک بوو هەستم دەکرد شێعرەکانم زۆر گۆڕاون ئیتر وڕکم لێناگرن و کز لە شوێنێ دانانیشن شادی دەکەن لەناخەوە شەڵەژاون نەم دەزانی خۆشەویستم بە سەردانێ تۆ هاتوویوو خۆشی دنیات بۆ هێناون محەممەدفاتێح محەممەدی ف-نامۆ لینکی کاناڵ👇👇👇👇 @namopoem

1

3 Jun 2026, 19:05 UTC942 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

پارچە شێعرێک لە ژێر ناوی قەسەم نامە بەرهەمی دواساڵەکانی دەیەی چلی کۆچی هەتاوی هۆنڕاوەی مامۆستا محەممەدفاتێحی محەممەدی دیکلەمەی هەستیاری مەزن مامۆستا عومەر ڕەسووڵی لینکی کاناڵ👇👇👇👇 @namopoem

2

27 May 2026, 18:13 UTC867 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

بەشێک لە شێعرێکی مامۆستا محەممەدفاتێح محەممەدی (ف_نامۆ) ب دەنگی مامۆستای مەزن و هونەرمەند کاک عومەر ڕەسووڵی لینکی کاناڵ👇👇👇 @namopoem

3🔥1

7 Jan 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,480 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

10

26 Dec 2025, 07:36 UTC≈1,570 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ڕێ و ڕەسمی ڕێزنان لە ناودارانی ئەم سەردەمەی شاری سەقز @namopoem

7👍2👏2

21 Dec 2025, 17:12 UTC≈1,460 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‍ یەلدا پیرۆز هاوڕێ ،چلە واهاتەوە یەلدا پیرۆز دووربی لەخەمو نەدا لەژینت باهۆز هاودەنگیوهاوڕەنگیوهاوهەنگاوی قەت پانەبڕێ لەتۆی بەرێزودڵسۆز *باهۆز: گردباد محەمەدفاتێح محەمەدی ف-نامۆ @namopoem

13 Dec 2025, 04:27 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 7 August 2026

ڕێبوار ڕێبوارەکەی بیاوانەکانی تەنیایی سەرهەڵگرتووی هەڵەمووتەکانی شەیدایی من دەزانم چ ئازارێکت کێشاوە من دەزانم هەڵوەدای کامە ئامانج و گەیشتن بە کام دیاری کەمێک لەم مەنزڵگایە دا بمێنەوە ڕەنگە شەقامی ئەم شارە پێڵاوی ئاوارەیی تۆ بکاتەوە ڕەنگە کۆڵانی ئەم شارە ئارەقەی ماندوویەتی تۆ بسڕێتەوە لێرا دار ئەرخەوانەکانیش ئاشقن

12 Dec 2025, 16:47 UTC≈1,200 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

فڕین فڕۆکە کاتێ هەڵفڕی کۆی جوانی لەگەڵ خۆ برد لەوبەر دنیا بوو بە بەهار لەمبەر دنیا، بەهارێ مرد ئێستێ ، دڵ خانەی ژاکاوی خەمێ زەردی ئاودامانە زەمەن، بەستێنی زریانی دەم بە هەڵپەی بێ ئامانە تەنیایی بیاوانێکە لەپێ ئاڵاوە وەک زنجیر بۆشایی لە دوای بۆشایی پەی نادا تێدا حزر و بیر مەخابن دەستێ دەرنایە قفڵی دووری بکاتەوە قورمی مەینەت بسڕێتەوە زاخاوی دڵ، بداتەوە فرۆکە کاتێ هەڵفڕی هەبوو نەبووی، ئاوەژوو کرد ڕەنگی زاڵی کا

3

23 Nov 2025, 17:23 UTC≈1,480 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @shahriarsaqhez

شێعری بووکەشووشە (بۆ منداڵان) بووکەشووشەی شیرینم کۆرپەی جوان و ڕەنگینم بۆت دەکەم لایەلایە ئەمشۆ بۆن؟ خەوت نایە ئەگەر ئەمشۆ باش بنوی نەگریت و ئارام بگری ئەتبەم بۆ شاری یاری بۆ چەرخ و فەلەک سواری بنوە لە کۆشی دایە مەڵی نا خەوم نایە محەممەدفاتێح محەممەدی ف_نامۆ لینکی کاناڵ👇👇👇👇 @namopoem @shahriarsaqhez

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @namopoem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 929,414 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ڕەگاژۆ” (@namopoem), 3,476 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namopoem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.