Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

USERNAME LIST | REDOMAIN

@namesguru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002248353700
TypeChannel
Username@namesguru
DescriptionUSERNAME LIST @REdomain Founder @x_instagram
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 29 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/namesguru

Growth

337 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:1533no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:5533first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍240.0%
120.0%
❤‍🔥120.0%
🔥120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2024 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jun 2026, 14:11 UTC156 viewsread 11 August 2026

383. @japanvpn 384. @duosvpn 385. @worldsvpn 386. @DuckduckGovpn

22 Oct 2025, 16:10 UTC557 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ready For sale @redomain 368. @timgifts 369. @giftnestworld 370. @rektgift 371. @antigifts 372. @giftsponsor 373. @giftmrktplace 374. @gifthigh 375. @giftsupreme 376. @giftvest 379. @newlygift 380. @thegifting 381. @imgifting 382. @mediascore DM @x_instagram x.com/_wonganom

8 Jul 2025, 22:11 UTC707 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

username A-Z keyword List 329. @a_b_s_t_r_a_c_t 330. @b_i_l_l_i_o_n_a_i_r_e_s 331. @b_u_l_l_b_e_a_r 332. @c_e_x_s 333. @c_o_l_l_e_c_t 334. @c_o_l_l_e_c_t_i_b_l_e 335. @c_o_f_o_u_n_d_e_r 336. @c_u_s_t_o_d_y 337. @d_e_x_s 338. @d_o_g_e_c_o_i_n_s 339. @e_n_d_o_r_s_e 340. @e_s_c_r_o_w_s 341. @g_i_f_t_i_n_g 342. @g_i_v_i_n_g 343. @g_m_a_i_l_s 344. @h_a_n_d_l_e 345. @h_e_d_g_e 346. @h_e_l_m_e_t 34

1❤‍🔥1🔥1

3 Jun 2025, 18:15 UTC400 viewsread 11 August 2026

321. @westernjava 322. @southeasteurope 323. @mrktfx 324. @giftsful 325. @sduos

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @namesguru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 64,142 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“USERNAME LIST | REDOMAIN” (@namesguru), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/namesguru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.