Channel
@nameforusyourmen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,195subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001435050269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nameforusyourmen |
| Description | This channel broadcasts: Fatāwa, Benefits, and Authoring’s, from Mashaayikh upon the Salafi Methodology, Past & Present. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nameforusyourmen |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 1,195 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
﷽ Reminder from the Scholar: Shaykh Sālih Al-‘Uthaymeen -May Allah have mercy on him- ▪️The eclipse▪️ The truthful one who is believed (i.e the Prophet ﷺ) said in what has been established from him in Saheehayn and other than it; regarding when the sun eclipses: «إن الشمس والقمر آيتان من آيات الله يخوف الله بهما عباده، وإنهما لا ينكسفان لموت أحد من الناس، فإذا رأيتم منها شيئاً فصلوا وادعوا الله ح…
بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم ◾️Taking pictures of animate beings and its connection to Shirk◾️ Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him - 📩🔹Question: Whats the link between making pictures of animate beings and Shirk? 📩🔸Answer: Picture making is an avenue and means for Shirk, like what’s found in the Hadith of Aisha - may Allah be pleased with her - that Um S…
بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم ◾️Declaring picture making to be permissible◾️ Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him - on the 2nd, Rajab, 1439H 📩🔹Question: O Shaykh, may Allah preserve you, whats the ruling on the one who says taking pictures (of animate beings) is permissible? 📩🔸Answer: Taking pictures of animate beings is prohibited and a great sin, the nar…
بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم ◾️The religion of Allah was spread by the Prophets through permissible means◾️ Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him - 📩🔹Question: What’s the reply to those who permit picture taking by way of video, in order to spread the religion, of what the people require by way of watching, such as the description of Hajj and the prayer in p…
The Daʿwah to Allah Is Not in Need of Taswir https://t.me/bajmaaleng/331
بســـم اللــه الرحــمــن الـرحـــيــم ◾️Some of the evidences that taking pictures of animate beings is severely prohibited◾️ Answered by Shaykh Abu Hamza Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - may Allah preserve him - 📩🔹Question: Is taking pictures of animate beings from the major sins? 📩🔸Answer: Yes it’s from the major sins, and this is due to what has come of threats in its regard: ➖”The angels do not enter a hou…
﷽ Benefit from the Allamah, the Mufti of the kingdom Shaykh Salih Al-Fawzān -May Allāh preserve him- ▪️No Ijtihad when there’s presence of clear textual evidence▪️ [Q] Virtuous Shaykh, if a Mujtahid has with him clear proof, does he say “this is the ruling of Allah” or “does he say this is my Ijtihaad”? [A] Clear proof doesn’t have Ijtihaad in it, there’s no Ijtihad with te…
File, posted without a caption
https://t.me/bashuaiben ▪️The mother is a school, who will study at this school?▪️ 🍃Jumu’ah Khutbah by Shaykh Hassan Ba Shu'ayb - May Allah the Most High preserve him 🍃
File, posted without a caption
Some of the scholars also declared disbelief of Muammar Gaddafi, yet despite that verdict, they didn’t advise the youth of Libya to revolt against him for this very same principle: “if changing an evil will bring about greater evil, then wisdom necessitates what? Remaining upon the first evil”. Yes, because the legislation came with what? It came to ward off evil. This is changing of evil, and what? Minimising it (no…
https://t.me/bashuaiben ▪️ What are the circumstances that make revolting against a Muslim ruler permissible?▪️ 🍃Shaykh Hassan bin Muhammed Ba Shu'ayb - May Allah the Most High preserve him🍃 🎙️….the Prophet ﷺ received pledge of allegiance from the companions, like what Ubādah bin As-Sāmit said: “We pledged allegiance to the Messenger ﷺ on hearing and obeying whether it’s at times pleasing and times not so pleasing…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nameforusyourmen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
““Name For Us Your Men”” (@nameforusyourmen), 1,195 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nameforusyourmen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.