Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Naman Nanda Scammer

@naman_nanda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001553747489
TypeChannel
Username@naman_nanda
Description7082344183 call and abuse scammer
Created28 July 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/naman_nanda

Growth

511 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:475no change
11 Aug 2026, 15:165first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 28 July 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 13s
Average length
7m 13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2022 to 31 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2022, 06:35 UTC361 viewsread 13 August 2026

His details Scammed amount: 4200 User id: 1415690589 Old username: @Naman_Nanda Phone Number: +917082344183 working please spam him Upi id: 7082344183@upi

31 Aug 2022, 05:57 UTC358 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Scammer deleted account He told that he will complete subs till August and in September i can leak his details if he dont do, but he deleted id at the last

28 Jul 2022, 11:28 UTC382 viewsread 13 August 2026

He took 4200rs on 9th june for tg subs and didnt gave subs neither refund. He told to delete the scam proofs channel which i made earlier then he will give money but now Blackmailing me and clearing history.😢 please help me🙏

28 Jul 2022, 11:20 UTC326 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

He forced me to delete the public channel where i posted proofs and told he will pay

28 Jul 2022, 11:18 UTC357 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

‼️Scammer alert Scammed amount: 4200 User id: 1415690589 Old username: @Naman_Nanda Phone Number: 7082344183 Upi id: 7082344183@upi

28 Jul 2022, 11:18 UTC268 viewsread 13 August 2026

I bought 84k subs at 4200rs from him but he didnt give me and now making excuses as u see

28 Jul 2022, 11:18 UTC244 viewsread 13 August 2026

He tells that he have started 2nd order so i will just ask if he started 2nd order of 84k then why the channel became 44k from 50k instead of increasing?

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @naman_nanda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,169,541 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Naman Nanda Scammer” (@naman_nanda), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/naman_nanda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.