Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

«NAKAT»

@nakatzpr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

173subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002175432324
TypeChannel
Username@nakatzpr
DescriptionДля помощи подразделению: Для переводов по СБП тел. +79901985772 в Т-Банк (Егор Евгеньевич Р.) Бот для анонимных вопросов и предложений: @NAKAT_TEXT_BOT Канал VK https://vkvideo.ru/club230125265
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/nakatzpr

Growth

1737 Aug 2026, 13:02 — 173 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 173 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:028 Aug 2026, 14:31
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:31173no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:02173first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
49
Videos
30
Links
36

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 19s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

338 reactions across 18 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7823.1%
🔥7522.2%
319.17%
🤣195.62%
custom 5242471260847353485154.44%
💯154.44%
custom 5445065645588750273133.85%
custom 5269261132241062444123.55%
👏102.96%
🕊102.96%
custom 538186713885836891882.37%
😁72.07%
👌61.78%
🥰51.48%
custom 547447070538912461041.18%
😍41.18%
🤝41.18%
🗿30.888%
🫡30.888%
custom 524722418332625679920.592%
9 further kinds144.14%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 1 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,022
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 18 we hold a reading for · 61%
Most on one post
730
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nakatzpr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2025 to 1 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Nov 2025, 07:55 UTC304 views15 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍7custom 54450656455887502733🔥21💯1😎1

18 Sept 2025, 08:44 UTC514 views14 reactions3 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥5👍42custom 54450656455887502732custom 54744707053891246101

27 Aug 2025, 12:32 UTC688 views18 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚡️😋😚😌😋 😋😋😌😌😌😌🪙 ❗️Родная команда! У нас новый сбор... Ребятам из штурмовой роты на Запорожском направлении крайне необходим квадрокоптер Mavic 3 (тушка) - 1 шт. + 3 батареи. Необходимая сумма - 200 000₽ Собрана сумма 36 732₽ Осталось собрать 163 268₽ Ребята на войне очень нуждаются в нашей с вами помощи. И надеются на нашу поддержку 🙏. Они тоже вкладываются из собственных средств, но без нас им не справится. Тол

👍7🔥5👏42

25 Aug 2025, 13:20 UTC483 views14 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥7👍4👏21

25 Aug 2025, 07:22 UTC474 views16 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Снова начали. Скидывают, с бабы яги + оставляют, на позициях. ‼️‼️‼️ Не клал - не поднимай! Не твоё - не трогай! Всё, что может быть заминированным, считайте заминированным! ☠

👍10👌3🤝2🔥1

19 Aug 2025, 09:20 UTC426 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍9🔥6🤝2custom 544506564558875027321custom 54745134145439164751

27 Apr 2025, 07:34 UTC825 views15 reactions55 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @OpasniyBiznesVideo

Доброе мотивационное

🔥6👌3🤣32custom 54450656455887502731

25 Apr 2025, 10:50 UTC744 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @battle_unitPhoto

Работа пулемётчика : коротко и жёстко Пулемётчик — это не про “бабах и бах”. Это опора группы, страх врага и тот, кто первым кладёт себя в грязь, чтоб остальные выжили. Если ты за пулемётом — ты стал огневым якорем. Задачи пулемётчика: 1. Огневая поддержка. Твоя задача — забить врага лицом в землю, чтобы свои могли передвигаться. Не убивать — подавлять. “Он не стреляет — значит боится. Боится — значит ты сделал ра

💯8🔥42👍2

24 Apr 2025, 04:45 UTC598 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rsotmdivisionVideo

Зеленский идёт в неправильном направлении.

🤣8💯3😁3

19 Apr 2025, 14:05 UTC753 views23 reactions54 Starsread 8 August 2026

Российская сторона останавливает все боевые действия в зоне СВО с 18:00 19 апреля до 00:00 21 апреля.

🕊10👍6👏31🤔1🤡1🫡1

17 Apr 2025, 11:44 UTC629 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @battle_unitPhoto

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Маскировка подразделения в лесополосе Боевой опыт 2022–2024 гг. /💥 💡Основы: что такое маскировка в реальном бою Разница между "так по уставу" и "так, чтобы не спалили". Цель маскировки: не быть замеченным с дрона, тепловизора, оптики. 💡. Зона размещения: где спрятался — там и выжил Реальность такая: если ты расположился удобно, красиво и ровненько — ты, скорее всего, труп. Правильный пример из опыта .

👍85🔥5💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nakatzpr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Apr 2025, 14:59 UTCFinal Results57 voters

Из какого пистолета можно вести автоматический огонь?

  1. Пистолет Макарова16%
  2. Пистолет Ярыгина28%
  3. Пистолет Стечкина56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2025 to 1 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«NAKAT»” (@nakatzpr), 173 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nakatzpr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.