Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 少爷的日常

Channel

少爷的日常

@nainai5456

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,249subscribers

+556 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004340245984
TypeChannel
Username@nainai5456
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nainai5456

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6931,2499719 August 2026 — 693 subscribers9 August 2026 — 710 subscribers16 August 2026 — 971 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,152 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,187 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,221 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,245 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,249 subscribers9 August 202615 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 37 days, net +556. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 610–1,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:151,249+4
11 Sept 2026, 16:391,245+24
7 Sept 2026, 00:161,221+34
2 Sept 2026, 19:341,187+17
30 Aug 2026, 09:091,170+18
27 Aug 2026, 11:451,152+42
24 Aug 2026, 01:551,110+139
16 Aug 2026, 15:05971+261
9 Aug 2026, 22:21710+17
9 Aug 2026, 17:46693first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC347 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❤️萝卜青菜各有所爱,出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗️ 厦门工兵 报告模板 【出击日期】:2026.8.9 【验证工兵】:章鱼哥 【老师艺名】:奈奈 【老师账号】:@NaiNai4567 【城市地区】:湖里 【水费次数】:700 【人照相似】:100 【目测年龄】:18 【颜值妆造】:100 【身材曲线】:100 【乳房状态】:B 【臀部形态】:肉感十足,看得出还在长身体 【皮肤状态】:皮肤滑,白皙 【bb的状态】:粉嫩敏感 【服务评分】:100 【情绪价值】:95 【日☀️后感/详细描述】:约过好几次没约上,今天刚回厦门第一天就约上了,妹妹人挺好的,北方妹子,身高170+,身材很苗条,胸很软弹,有脐钉很美,半甲纹身加攻速。脚有美甲车厘子,足控手控可冲,挺健谈的。兄弟们冲吧,极品。 【总体评分】:(满分100) 【推荐指数】⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(最高7颗星) 【⚠️须提供约课记录

1

9 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC442 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

我哪有坏脾气 我不是在跟你撒娇吗 厦门开课啦 @NaiNai4567

3 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,230 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

明天厦门开课哦哥哥们晚安 @NaiNai4567

1

1 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,440 viewsread 9 August 2026

【老师艺名】:奈奈 【联系方式】:@NaiNai4567 【舔狗留名】:星 【验证时间】:8.1 【大概位置】:财富 【修车水费】:7/1p 【身高体重】:173左右 100 【目测年龄】:18 【人照相似】:98 【凶器罩杯】:A+ 【皮肤情况】:光滑 【老师态度】:100 最满意的一次 【老师缺点】:无 【老师优点】:御姐不高冷 【老师口活】:舒服 【体验过程】:打开门发现颜值比照片还顶,以为年轻意味着态度比较差,没有想到奈奈全程笑容相待,交了水费就去简单的冲洗,上了床就开始口,口了一会儿,秉着学习生物的心态让老师尝试69,通过观察下面粉粉的,硬的不行就开始带☔,老师先在上面,还挺调皮的让我尝试了两个档,看着老师那张御姐脸真是特别来感觉,直接翻身做主人,在尝试后入的过程中直接就123了,浅浅冲个澡心满意足的回家睡觉了,十分推荐后入,老师感觉是十大名器,需要更有经验的兄弟去鉴定下。 【综合评语】:不去可惜 【老师频道】: h

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nainai5456. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“少爷的日常” (@nainai5456), 1,249 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nainai5456.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.