Channel
@nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
127subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003144625755 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m |
@nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 127 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 130 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 135 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 131 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 131 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
162 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5204273075847199488 | 49 | 30.2% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 27.2% | |
| custom 5206498083654888951 | 17 | 10.5% | |
| 🌚 | 15 | 9.26% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 8.02% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 6.17% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.617% | |
| 👾 | 1 | 0.617% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 от Союза Художников ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ условия: 🌟подписка на спонсора @popeechunya 🌟репост этого поста в чат/канал ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ в комментариях пришлите свои работы и ссылку на канал! будем многих выкладывать 🔗
❤1👍1🤡1custom 52064980836548889511
Мне всегда казалось что у кроша должна быть заячья губа. Я хз почему. Я чувствую себя как те самые художники, с англ фд
custom 52064980836548889517custom 52042730758471994884🌚3❤1🤡1
Ура, моё любимое мыло
❤6custom 52064980836548889512
Кое-кто подсел на пейзажи
❤7🔥4
Пизжу идею у своей мью (её тгк, она тоже художник) И напоминаю вам про свою анонимку. Позадавайте вопросиков пж, любых, я хочу на них ответить
custom 52042730758471994884custom 52064980836548889513👾1
Что-то такое получилось
❤8custom 52042730758471994883
Впервые рисую полноценный фон... При чём архитектурный
custom 52042730758471994884❤1👀1
Мне бы щас реально засесть, и начать смотреть китайские туториалы
🌚2🕊2custom 52064980836548889511
Пиздец
custom 52042730758471994885❤2👍2
Немного щп вам, я зашарила за лост медиа, при чём это случайно получилось. Ща аву поменяю мб.... Хотя не, джим всё-таки роднее
❤2custom 52042730758471994882
Я ожидала большего, как всегда.......
custom 52042730758471994888❤6
🤩🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🌟🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 2️⃣7️⃣+К АУДИТОРИИ 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩РЕПОСТ К СЕБЕ В ТГК 🤩🤩 ПОДПИСКА НА: ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 1️⃣➖ @Piar_Hydognikov 🤩 2️⃣➖ @immrabb 🤩 3️⃣➖ @Art_Nefrit 🤩 4️⃣➖ @kivipr 🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖⭐️ Анкеты можете присылать во все каналы
🔥3🌚2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Склад деловых бумаг лува/еко” (@nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m), 127 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nagn1t3_m3nya_rak0m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.