Channel
@nadyanoblegait
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
91subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001994780375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nadyanoblegait |
| Description | Я создатель и дизайнер бренда одежды NG-brand (Noble Gait Brand) @ngbrandstore Здесь личное/красота/стиль/шопинг/поездки/еда/психология/дом |
| Created | Between 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nadyanoblegait |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 91 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 91 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 511 |
| Reactions total | 113 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
113 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 37 | 32.7% | |
| custom 5341458677788338901 | 19 | 16.8% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 14.2% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| ⚡ | 8 | 7.08% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 6.19% | |
| 😍 | 6 | 5.31% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 5.31% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.65% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nadyanoblegait. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Знаете, я считаю, что люди кто заморачивается по поводу одежды и внешнего вида молодцы! Независимо от стиля. Те кто считают, что это всё просто тряпки-цацки, вам тоже респект. Так на вашем фоне мы ещё заметнее 😂😆😘
💯11💘5😁2
Outfit of my day ♠️ Я не представляю городской летний гардероб без хлопка и льна. Я люблю плотные толстые изделия, которые держат форму и жесткость. Жилет и подвес из хлопка Можно посмотреть нажав на голубой текст Брюки льняные от российского charuel у меня в классическом исполнении, есть модель на кулиске (примеряла, тоже кайф) и также выбор цвета Всем красоты 😘
🥰5⚡4🙏2
Сколько у вас было хомячков? В вашей жизни? У меня в детстве 2-3 точно В трех литровой банке 🫣😂 Как у всех) И у детей У каждой дочери Этот сирийской породы Милый, кстати, оказался парень Третий по счету И еще: как это происходит В детстве ты с ними целуешься 😂 таскаешь их А сейчас я его на руки не возьму) не хочу) один раз пальчиком по спинке погладила, Маша уговорила. Он мягкий 😆
custom 53414586777883389012🥰1😁1
Спасибо хомячкам, что они есть! Когда ребенок просит домашнего питомца всегда выручат)
💯9custom 53414586777883389018😁4
О красивом. Надежда Светлова pinned «Официально сегодня начинаю распродажу перед закрытием офлайн магазина Сюда постить ничего не буду Вся информация будет в оф группе Кому интересно Не пропускайте посты Включайте уведомления https://t.me/ngbrandstore»
Официально сегодня начинаю распродажу перед закрытием офлайн магазина Сюда постить ничего не буду Вся информация будет в оф группе Кому интересно Не пропускайте посты Включайте уведомления https://t.me/ngbrandstore
Я жарю молодые цукини колечками, прямо с кожурой, слегка обмакнув с двух сторон ржаной мукой. И могу съесть такое блюдо одна) Напоминаю, что из кабачков можно также приготовить: Туфли балетки 😁 Оладушки Рецепты прикрепила, нажимайте пальчиком на голубое слово 😉
💘8custom 53414586777883389012
На дворе август И если ещё никто не подарил вам кабачок - хочу вас расстроить, дела ваши плохи!
💯10custom 53414586777883389015
Посмотрел «Одиссею» Кристофера Нолана и считаю, что это отличная работа и сильное высказывание 18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ПИВОВАРОВЫМ АЛЕКСЕЕМ ВЛАДИМИРОВИЧЕМ ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА ПИВОВАРОВА АЛЕКСЕЯ ВЛАДИМИРОВИЧА Я не мастак писать рецензии, к тому же на «Одиссею» есть уже несколько хороших и профессиональных. Сам фил…
💯1
18+ Алексей Пивоваров (инагент в РФ) отличный отзыв оставил на Одиссею! Хватит о подвигах! Война - это трагедия!
💯2
Этот канал создан мной для общения на темы, указанные в описании. Здесь нет места политике, вопросам связанным с религией и подобным сложным темам. Потому что это не является тематикой этого канала. Но я человек! И вы все реальные люди! И сколько не пытайся, сколько не отгораживайся от реальности, она догоняет! Трагедия под Геленджиком на пляже, где пострадало много просто отдыхающих людей и погибли ДЕТИ!!!! Это не…
🙏7💯4😭3custom 53414586777883389011
Кстати, пайеточный бум не отпускает. Из пайеток не только одежда, но и обувь, сумки, ободки. Вы ещё не вступили в эту секту?) Я кажется, попалась! На днях купила сумку с пайетками 🫣🪩👯♀️
😍6⚡4💘3🙏2custom 53414586777883389011
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @nadyanoblegait. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“О красивом. Надежда Светлова” (@nadyanoblegait), 91 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadyanoblegait.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.