من نادیام، روانشناس بالینی و اینجا راهبردهای مغزمحور برای زندگی بهتر-به خصوص برای ADHDها- رو آموزش
میدم
👇آیدی ادمین👇
@ADHD_admin_2
پیج اینستاگرام: nadia.braincoaching
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
19 measurements spanning 71 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,611–7,784 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 06:07
7,631
-4
1 Nov 2026, 23:36
7,635
-12
29 Oct 2026, 14:29
7,647
-10
26 Oct 2026, 03:21
7,657
-8
22 Oct 2026, 18:47
7,665
-3
19 Oct 2026, 07:59
7,668
-35
16 Oct 2026, 00:31
7,703
-2
12 Oct 2026, 17:34
7,705
-1
5 Oct 2026, 22:22
7,706
-8
28 Sept 2026, 13:37
7,714
-22
18 Sept 2026, 22:41
7,736
-7
14 Sept 2026, 14:20
7,743
-5
11 Sept 2026, 00:58
7,748
-4
6 Sept 2026, 02:40
7,752
-5
1 Sept 2026, 11:54
7,757
-1
29 Aug 2026, 02:35
7,758
-5
26 Aug 2026, 07:36
7,763
-1
25 Aug 2026, 22:45
7,764
no change
25 Aug 2026, 22:30
7,764
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 24 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.1%
avg views ÷ 7,631 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,460
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 October 2026
Posts held
21 (24 May 2025 – 17 October 2026)
Views total
1,460
Reactions total
33
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 01:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
79
Videos
24
Links
64
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
3m 29s
Average length
3m 29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
782 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
414
52.9%
👍
121
15.5%
👏
98
12.5%
🙏
57
7.29%
❤🔥
26
3.32%
🤯
16
2.05%
🕊
12
1.53%
💯
10
1.28%
🔥
10
1.28%
🏆
8
1.02%
🤝
3
0.384%
🫡
3
0.384%
🤣
2
0.256%
👌
1
0.128%
🤗
1
0.128%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 17 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
سلام شبت بخیر
و امیدوارم زندگی پر مغزی داشته باشی🧠
چند روز پیش در اینستاگرام پستی منتشر کردیم که سروصدا کرد اساسی...🤓
در این پست از مقالهای صحبت کردم که به تازگی منتشر شده و نشون داده بزرگسال مبتلا به ADHD_ در مقایسه با سایر افراد_ 7 تا 9 سال امید به زندگی پایینتری دارند 💔
چرا؟
لینک پست رو برات میذارم که خودت ببینی
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DeRZH6uABj6/?dlrf=MThmdjJ4MjU4YW4wbA==
و لینک پایین هم همون مقال…
در شرایطی که درونم پر از خشمه، و اطرافیانم شکستن یا فقط شرایطو پذیرفتن ...
من چطور میتونمتابآور باشم و در دل چالش، اقدامکنم؟
تو این پادکست درباره تله بز یهودا و 3 اصل اساسی ذهنیت تابآور صحبت میکنیم
🌅 آینده روشنه
آکادمی انتخابی
⛔️ بزرگترین پروژهای که تو زندگیت داری
همونکاری که از انجام دادنش فرار میکنی
همون هدفی که تو رو میترسونه
همونه که قراره زندگیت رو عوض کنه
⚠️ چطور از پسش بربیای و انجامش بدی؟
پادکست 《 تلاش بدون زور زدن 》 در کانال ریست منتشر شد
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
🏹 اینطور که ارسطو گفته:
《 ما همان رفتارهایی هستیم که به طور مداوم تکرار میکنیم، پس رسیدن به تعالی یک عمل نیست، یک عادته 》
۷۰ درصد تایم بیداری، ما به تکرار عادتوار رفتارها مشغولیم
بدون اینکه حتی ازش آگاه باشیم
⁉️ چطور از عادت به عنوان ابزاری برای رسیدن به اهداف استفاده کنیم؟
پادکست سیستم سازی عادتها در کانال ریست منتشر شد
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2Mm…
یه سلام پُر مغز 🧠
❌ اگر داستان بالا برات حس آشنایی ایجاد کرد، این وویس رو حتما گوش بده
و به جمع ما ملحق شو
✅ لینک کانال RESET
https://t.me/+-zdzNbC9j1c2MmE0
🧶 کلماتش مثل یه کلاف سردرگم بود، انگار با خودش و زندگی میجنگید و نمیدونست چه کاری باید بکنه.
میگفت:
《 به خاطر این ADHD تو زندگیم به هیچ جایی نرسیدم》
جملهش پر از احساس شکست و سرزنش بود.
میتونستم از نگاهش بفهمم که منتظره از من بشنوه:
《 نه اینطور فکر نکن تو خیلی خوبی 》
اما جواب من این بود:
《 چه اتفاقی باید بیفته که حس کنی در زندگیت به جایی رسیدی؟ 》
فکر کرد اما جوابی نداشت
میگفت:
《 اینقدر نگران آیندهم که فکرم د…
وقتی میخوایم بحث کنیم
🔍 هدف: کم کردن تنشهای کلامی و کمک به اینکه واقعاً همدیگه رو بشنویم، نه فقط حرف بزنیم.
در موقعیت جنگی، مغز خیلیها تو حالت جنگ یا گریز قرار میگیره.
یعنی به جای اینکه واقعیت رو منطقی پردازش کنه، دنبال «دفاع» و «حمله»ست.
اگه بدونی چطور وارد بحث بشی، میتونی کمک کنی مغز طرف مقابل آرومتر بشه و حرفت شنیده شه.
✅ سه تکنیک ساده اما اثرگذار:
⭕️ ۱. احساس رو شناسایی کن، بعد بیان کن
قبل از اینکه …
وقتی میخوایم درخواست بدیم
🔍 هدف: افزایش وضوح در روابط و کاهش سوءتفاهم
⭕️⭕️ اول وضعیت رو توصیف کن (نه تفسیر):
الان شهر خیلی شلوغ شده و من استرسم بالاست
⭕️ بعد نیازتو واضح بگو:
«میخوام که با هم یه برنامهی ساده بریزیم برای چند روز آینده.»
⭕️بعد درخواست کن، نه دستور:
«میتونی کمکم کنی یه لیست جمعوجور از وسایل تهیه کنم؟»
❌ یادت باشه: درخواست روشن، فشار ذهنی رو کم میکنه، چون یکی از پایههای تنظیم هیجان، «احساس…
❤15👍4❤🔥2👏2🤝2🔥1
Signed Sarvin Sarfarazi
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @nadiabraincoaching. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
وقتی میخوای یه کار کوچیک مثل زدن یک ایمیل یا برداشتن یک شیء رو انجام بدی، بیشتر وقتا چی پیش میاد؟
انجامش میدم و میرم سراغ کار بعدی😎10%
انجامش میدم، ولی کلی طول میکشه تا شروع کنم🙄22%
حواسم پرت چیزای دیگه میشه، بعد یادم میره🙄30%
کلی کار دیگه وسطش انجام میدم، ولی اون کار اصلی جا میمون😢37%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2025 to 17 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ADHD FARSI | روانشناسی @adhdbefarsi · 22,128 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
نوروساینس با دکتر فریا @drfrya · 61,376 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
علی ميرصادقی @ali_mirsadeghi · 45,639 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
قانون جذب و مراقبه @jazbomoraghebe · 36,981 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 1 September 2026
مریم مجیدی نژاد|آموزش ادمینی @maryammajidinejadtel · 24,754 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
توسعه فردی | مریم مبارکی @maryam_mobaraki · 25,045 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
بیشتر از یک نفر | پیام بهرام پور @bishtarazyek · 50,661 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نادیا انتخابی | درمان ADHD و نقص تمرکز” (@nadiabraincoaching), 7,631 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nadiabraincoaching.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.