Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 1 класс

Channel

1 класс

@nachalniy_1_klass

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,796subscribers

+592 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002163171860
TypeChannel
Username@nachalniy_1_klass
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/nachalniy_1_klass

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,1987,8357,516.57 August 2026 — 7,204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,204 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,206 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,198 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,294 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,343 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,377 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,399 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,427 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,434 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,429 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,517 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,607 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,625 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,646 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,672 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,674 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,748 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,804 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,817 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,835 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,830 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,827 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,822 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,809 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,801 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,796 subscribers7,7967 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net +592. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,102–7,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 22:077,796-5
5 Nov 2026, 08:457,801-8
2 Nov 2026, 10:047,809-13
30 Oct 2026, 06:387,822-5
27 Oct 2026, 07:587,827-3
24 Oct 2026, 05:377,830-5
21 Oct 2026, 09:377,835+18
18 Oct 2026, 11:317,817+13
15 Oct 2026, 09:167,804+56
12 Oct 2026, 10:417,748+74
5 Oct 2026, 16:167,674+2
28 Sept 2026, 02:217,672+26
18 Sept 2026, 13:187,646+21
14 Sept 2026, 08:577,625+18
10 Sept 2026, 23:407,607+90
5 Sept 2026, 18:577,517+88
1 Sept 2026, 15:567,429-5
29 Aug 2026, 23:547,434+7
27 Aug 2026, 10:047,427+28
24 Aug 2026, 18:277,399first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.2%
avg views ÷ 7,796 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,450
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.139%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 October 2026
Posts held46 (3 August 2026 – 11 October 2026)
Views total51,730
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 13:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 25m
Average length
7m 07s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 40 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15467.0%
👍5122.2%
🔥114.78%
🙏104.35%
🥰20.87%
👌10.435%
👏10.435%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,370 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Обучение грамоте. Урок 26-27 Буква Т т. Рабочий лист. Просторы интернета 🌐 Не забывайте про ❤️👍

❤6

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,030 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Обучение грамоте. Урок 26-27. Буква Т т https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤4

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,730 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

Математика. Отрезок. Ломаная. https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤7👍4

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,640 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

Математика. Точка, прямая и кривая. https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤6

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,690 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
File

Математика. Точка, прямая и кривая. https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

👍6❤1

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈4,950 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Математика. Точка, прямая и кривая. https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤4👍3

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈2,810 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Обучение грамоте. Урок 26. Буква Т т https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤3

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,330 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Пропись. Урок 24-25 Письмо буквы Н н https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤2

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,460 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Математика. Чётные и нечётные числа https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤4

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈4,200 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Математика. Точка, прямая, кривая линия. Отрезок, ломаная. https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤4

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,700 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Пропись. Урок 26-27 Письмо буквы Т т https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤2

11 Oct 2026, 17:06 UTC≈3,290 views5 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Обучение грамоте. Урок 27. Буква Т т https://t.me/nachalniy_1_klass

❤5

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @nachalniy_1_klass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @nachalniy_1_klass as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Учу сердцем
@anna_tochka_znaniy · 50,429
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Подготовка к школе
@intresting100 · 43,087
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
E-BAZA ISH REJA
@e_baza_ishreja · 306,985
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
3-Sinf Fayllar Bazasi
@uchinchisinf · 129,003
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
EduTests.uz
@edutestsuz · 67,845
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
E-BAZA UZBEKISTAN | O'QITUVCHI
@e_baza_uzbekistan · 132,126
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
O'qituvchilar Hujjati
@oqituvchilar_hujjati · 118,217
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“1 класс” (@nachalniy_1_klass), 7,796 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nachalniy_1_klass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.