Channel
@na_kruzhyni
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,967subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001698259731 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @na_kruzhyni |
| Created | 1 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/na_kruzhyni |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 5,967 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:15 | 5,966 | +10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 5,956 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 5,957 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 5,956 | +1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 5,955 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:37 | 5,961 | -7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 5,968 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 5,970 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 5,969 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,202 reactions across 22 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 471 | 39.2% | |
| ❤ | 423 | 35.2% | |
| 😢 | 77 | 6.41% | |
| ✍ | 68 | 5.66% | |
| 💔 | 53 | 4.41% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 4.08% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 2.25% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 1.58% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.666% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 0.416% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.166% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 Як воно горить У новинах читаємо: Президент провів нараду щодо дипстрайків. Деякі джерела вживають останнє слово у формі діпстрайк. Пам’ятаймо, що, згідно з правилом дев’ятки, у словах іншомовного походження пишемо и після низки приголосних. Втім, слово дипстрайк не називає нового поняття, для якого в українській бракує власних засобів. Уживання такої лексеми не збагачує нашу мову, а тільки витісняє зрозумілі в…
🔥41✍13❤6
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤24👍9✍4
Щось сталося зі смертю на рубежі століть, у ній зайшла переміна, довший час ніким не завважувана: як нова нота в оркестрі, ширилась і утверджувалась нова форма смерти — безпричинна. Зведено було вважати, що люди мруть від хвороб, від старости, від нещасного випадку, від чиєїсь руки, — що в такому поважному ділі конче присутня причина, і смерть поводилась чемно. А на рубежі століть вона раптом ніби з'їхала з глузду, …
😢49👍8🔥5
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍20❤10😢5
«Кому треба — й так купить!» А покупці аж за голову хапаються, почувши, яку ціну гне мовчун. Думає, мабуть, що у Києві грошики ростуть на гіллі, як сливи. (Марія Пригара) #Словниковий_запас Чайка на крижині
❤37✍13🤔2
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍30❤7💯2
📌 Індія й демоніми Часом деякі демоніми — назви жителів певних теренів — вживають некоректно. Зокрема часто у живій мові трапляються помилки зі словами індієць, індіанець та індус. Індійці — загальна назва корінного населення Індії та Пакистану. Натомість індіанці — корінні жителі Америки. Так їх назвав мореплавець Христофор Колумб, оскільки вважав, що континент, який він віднайшов, — Індія. Індусами, зі свого боку…
👍60❤14✍5
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤18👍14🤔10
Велика вода, суцільна голубінь вже оточує їх. Ніжно-блакитна шовковість небес і густо насичена синню, аж чорна просторінь, моря — такий їхній світ, серед якого їм чути тільки хлюпання хвилі та ритмічне поскрипування кочетів. Море, що спершу прозоро просвічувало аж до дна і зверху було веселим, синім, щодалі мовби темнішає, важчає, воно стає і справді чорним, можна зрозуміти, чому його так назвали. І хвилі, всюди хв…
👍37❤21🥰3
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤26✍12👍4
Хата ця була прибрана, як заведено. Дубові лавки із штучно виробленими спинками були виправлені лаком, стіл засланий білим тонким обрусом. На покуті висіла велика ікона. (Володимир Леонтович. «Пани й люди») #Словниковий_запас Чайка на крижині
❤33✍12👍3
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍24❤8🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @na_kruzhyni. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Позначте правильний наголос.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чайка на крижині” (@na_kruzhyni), 5,967 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/na_kruzhyni.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.