Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NKres

@n_kres

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,358subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002221556316
TypeChannel
Username@n_kres
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/n_kres

Growth

1,3581,3671,362.57 August 2026 — 1,367 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,367 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,363 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,358 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,357–1,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:351,358-5
11 Aug 2026, 03:341,363-4
7 Aug 2026, 22:191,367no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:171,367first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 9 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

626 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16726.7%
14423.0%
🥰10216.3%
custom 5377320714112087415416.55%
🤗294.63%
custom 5253463362058070742233.67%
custom 5233570422162729804203.19%
👍172.72%
custom 5224357283521113142142.24%
custom 5276153777362055748132.08%
custom 5377575719205353824111.76%
custom 5298955157441097836101.60%
custom 525624201262505754681.28%
custom 528765672627792849281.28%
🤩81.28%
🦄81.28%
custom 529873475689933506920.319%
💋10.16%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 626reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
48
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 14 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @n_kres. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 April 2026 to 9 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC350 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤗17🥰9🦄84custom 52243572835211131422🔥1custom 53773207141120874151

8 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC383 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

10👍8🥰6

2 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC506 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰12🔥75custom 52761537773620557483🤗1custom 52335704221627298041custom 52987347568993350691

2 Jul 2026, 09:37 UTC443 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

11🔥7🥰6custom 52243572835211131423

8 Jun 2026, 16:52 UTC646 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

18🥰12🤩8🤗2custom 52761537773620557482

7 Jun 2026, 20:32 UTC625 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

11🔥9custom 52335704221627298043custom 52761537773620557481

7 Jun 2026, 16:44 UTC615 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

15🔥7custom 52534633620580707424custom 52876567262779284923

7 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC581 views32 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

20🤗6🥰6

6 Jun 2026, 19:33 UTC591 views52 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🥰2613👍6custom 53773207141120874155🔥1custom 52562420126250575461

3 May 2026, 14:44 UTC916 views78 reactions12 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Наконец-то теплая погода и веселое настроение 😁

🔥37custom 525346336205807074215custom 5233570422162729804125custom 52876567262779284925custom 52989551574410978364

14 Apr 2026, 14:15 UTC≈1,160 views68 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Video

Минутка нежности 🥰

custom 53773207141120874152813custom 52243572835211131429🔥4👍3🤗3custom 52761537773620557483🥰2

12 Apr 2026, 11:22 UTC980 views54 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Гав-гав! С Пасхой, любимые! 🐶 Пусть будет много радости, улыбок и… может, кусочек кулича для нас? ❤️

🔥30🥰10custom 53773207141120874157custom 529895515744109783621custom 52335704221627298041custom 52534633620580707421custom 52761537773620557481

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @n_kres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 608,953 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NKres” (@n_kres), 1,358 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n_kres.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.