Channel
@n_a_n_0_s
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6,074subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001681560265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @n_a_n_0_s |
| Created | 24 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/n_a_n_0_s |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 6,074 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 6,078 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 6,080 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 6,086 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 6,087 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 6,087 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
614 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 279 | 45.4% | |
| 🔥 | 142 | 23.1% | |
| ❤ | 116 | 18.9% | |
| 🤔 | 46 | 7.49% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 5.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2025 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Lt. Dr. Peter McCullough blockiert der Nikotingehalt im Blut das Spike-Protein. Ebenso zerstört Nikotin Nanostrukturen im Blut, welche die Nanobots bilden. Falls man jetzt kein Raucher ist, könnte man ersatzweise Schnupftabak, Kautabak oder Nikotinpflaster verwenden. 👉 Kanal Anti Nano Gerät
👍13👏6❤3
⚠️ Anti Nano Gerät - zum Ausleiten von Nanopartikeln u. Nanobots durch Chemtrails u. Covid Impfungen⚠️ Unser Gerät ist zum Ausleiten magnetischer Nanopartikel u. Nanobots geeignet, welche durch Impfungen, Chemtrails, Nahrungsmittel, Medikamente usw. in den menschlichen Körper gelangen können. Habe auch schon Patente zu Infusionen gesehen, wo man das beigemischt hat. Speziell die Covid Impfung soll jede Menge Graph…
❤12👍4👏1
Dr. Hagima enthüllt die verborgene Seite der Agenda 2030: Nanotechnologie und digitale Kontrolle Analysiert die Säulen der Agenda 2030 und wie die digitale Biokonvergenz die menschliche Biologie neu definiert. In diesem Video spricht die Ärztin über: * Digitale Identität und MAC-Adressen: Es wird das Phänomen der Emission von MAC-Codes bei geimpften Personen thematisiert und wie die digitale ID als „stiller Vertra…
👍14🔥4❤1
Hier mal eine Kurzmeldung. Keine Gewähr, ob das aktuell noch so ist. 👉 Kanal Anti Nano Gerät
👍16👏4❤2🤔2
In diesem Beitrag analysiert Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger die Konvergenz zwischen dem CERN, den Machtnetzwerken von Jeffrey Epstein und einer globalen transhumanistischen Agenda. Die Wissenschaftlerin und Forscherin legt detailliert dar, wie Epstein wissenschaftliche Institutionen infiltrierte, um synthetische Biologie, Gen-Editierung und Bewusstseinstransfer zu finanzieren. Der Bericht kommt zu dem Schluss, dass diese…
👍6❤3
Rockefeller-Patent über die neuronale Aktivierung bzw. Deaktivierung von Gehirnzentren mittels Nanopartikeln, Wärme u. externen magnetischen Feldern. So kann aus der Ferne Hunger, Sättigungsgefühl, Schlaf oder Aktivität ausgelöst werden. Man hat das natürlich erstmal an Ratten getestet. Trotz voller Futtertröge sind die Tiere verhungert. 👉 Kanal Anti Nano Gerät
👍24❤6
Dr. Wilfredo Stokes prangert an, dass die Menschheit Opfer eines hybriden Krieges ist, der von Regierungen und Eliten geführt wird Klimakrieg: Phänomene wie Überschwemmungen (Sturzfluten) und Polarfronten sind nicht natürlich, sondern ein durch Antennentechnologie und militärische Luftangriffe programmiertes Klima, um soziales Leid zu erzeugen. Nanotechnologie und Gesundheit: Covid-Impfstoffe und die jüngsten Impfu…
👍22❤3👏1
⚠️ Globale Hybridisierungs-Agenda 2026 Ricardo Delgado analysiert den technologischen Fahrplan für die Hybridisierung der menschlichen Spezies. Das wichtigste Mittel für diese massive Umsetzung war der COVID-19-Impfstoff, dessen weltweite Einführung die Impfung der meisten Menschen mit der auf Graphen basierenden flüssigen Schnittstelle ermöglichte. Dieses Material wird derzeit in allen Arten von aktuellen Impfstof…
👍18🤔8❤5👏1🔥1
⚠️ Anti Nano Gerät - zum Ausleiten von Nanopartikeln u. Nanobots durch Chemtrails u. Covid Impfungen⚠️ Unser Gerät ist zum Ausleiten magnetischer Nanopartikel u. Nanobots geeignet, welche durch Impfungen, Chemtrails, Nahrungsmittel, Medikamente usw. in den menschlichen Körper gelangen können. Habe auch schon Patente zu Infusionen gesehen, wo man das beigemischt hat. Speziell die Covid Impfung soll jede Menge Graph…
👍17❤10🔥2
Dr. Liliana Zelada führt eine optische Mikroskopiesitzung verschiedener Arten von Impfstoffen vor der Organisation der Händlerföderation der Stadt El Alto in La Paz, Bolivien, durch, zusammen mit dem Organisator der Veranstaltung und Leiter des Nachbarschaftsrats von El Alto, Gregorio Mamani, der Leiterin der Händlerföderation Dionicia Callizaya Quispe, dem UPEA-Koordinator und gleichzeitig Journalisten, sowie einige…
👍29❤6
Nach der mRNA-Impfung: Jetzt kommt die genetische Umerziehung des Immunsystems Die nächste Generation von Impfstoffen steht bereit – und sie hat es in sich. Eine neue Fachveröffentlichung aus dem Motherhood International Journal of Research and Innovation (Juni 2025) beschreibt unter dem Titel „CRISPR-Cas9-Based mRNA Vaccines: The Next Frontier in Precision Immunotherapy“ nichts weniger als die Vision eines programm…
🔥22❤4🤔3
⚠️ Vorsicht bei Aufklärungsbögen im Krankenhaus Sie wollen die Ungeimpften durch die Hintertür doch noch impfen. Impfstoffe werden einfach zu Biologika u. Biogenics umbenannt u. wenn ihr das unterschreibt, können die quasi mit euch machen, was sie wollen. Injektionen aller Art sind dann grundsätzlich möglich. Also unterschreibt da nichts ungelesen u. verwahrt euch ausdrücklich dagegen. 👉 Kanal Anti Nano Gerät
👍35❤12🔥2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @n_a_n_0_s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 16,976 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@n_a_n_0_s named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚠️ Anti▫️Nano▫️Gerät ⚠️ Nanopartikel ausleiten - Nanobots Impfschäden Chemtrails Graphenoxid Schwermetalle Graphen Morgellons” (@n_a_n_0_s), 6,074 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/n_a_n_0_s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.