Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Beauty with K

Channel

Beauty with K

@myyssooull

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

1,279subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002106976609
TypeChannel
Username@myyssooull
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/myyssooull

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2791,3221,300.57 August 2026 — 1,322 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,322 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,321 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,319 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,317 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,313 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,309 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,306 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,292 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,285 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,279 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,273–1,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 10:381,279-6
8 Sept 2026, 16:171,285-7
2 Sept 2026, 23:051,292-5
30 Aug 2026, 12:381,297-9
27 Aug 2026, 05:021,306-3
24 Aug 2026, 03:421,309-4
20 Aug 2026, 11:261,313-4
17 Aug 2026, 11:451,317-2
13 Aug 2026, 13:481,319-2
10 Aug 2026, 22:221,321-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:311,322no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:511,322first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

351 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘8223.4%
💋7922.5%
❤‍🔥7421.1%
😍4613.1%
🍓3610.3%
349.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 351 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @myyssooull. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 October 2025 to 1 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Dec 2025, 17:07 UTC≈2,640 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

➖Наконец-то могу написать ➖отзыв о масках от ➖Бабушки Агафьи. ❣Хорошие ли? Да. ❣Стоит ли покупать их? Да. ❣Дают ли какой-то эффект? Тоже, да. ❕Кому подойдут? ✨Голубая очищающая (с голубой глиной): для жирной и комбинированной кожи, склонной к воспалениям и несовершенствам. ❣После неё моя кожа стала бархатистой, хорошо тонизирует, успокаивает. Ссылочка ✨Омолаживающая: для сухой, нормальной и возрастной кожи, нуж

❤‍🔥10💋8💘8😍31

30 Nov 2025, 15:32 UTC≈1,670 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Это не правда 👀

💋10❤‍🔥5🍓5💘5

30 Nov 2025, 15:31 UTC≈1,630 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🍓9💋7❤‍🔥5😍5💘3

30 Nov 2025, 15:14 UTC≈1,590 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отправила это подружкам и решила, что с вами тоже надо этим поделится) ☕️Кофейный скраб от ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Девочки, кожа после него бархатистая и вся в золотых, мерцающих частицах.😻 Скраб очень ароматный, любители кофе (о, это Я!Я!🙋🏽‍♀️) - оценят 🤭 Ссылочка на эту красоту Знаю, что в ассортименте есть также с серебряными частицами, тут уже дело вкуса, пробуйте✋

😍9💋6💘6❤‍🔥4

28 Nov 2025, 22:39 UTC≈1,200 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💘53❤‍🔥2💋2

28 Nov 2025, 21:41 UTC≈1,150 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😋Кстати, девчонки. На протяжении 4 месяцев активно пользуюсь маской от ✨✨✨✨✨✨ 📍Что обещает производитель: ▪️борьба с акне ▪️сужение пор ▪️регулирование кожного себума ‼️Что мы получаем в итоге? Всё выше перечисленное, обожаю, когда продукт соответствует своей характеристике. Маска очень меня спасала от любых раздражений и что самое главное: ‼️СОСТАВ ЧИСТЕЙШИЙ. 📍Всего 4 компонента: ▪️Каолин — Очищает, абсорбир

💋7❤‍🔥6😍5💘2

28 Nov 2025, 21:23 UTC705 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Как говорится: Я Конор, и я это проверю..

😍6💘53

28 Nov 2025, 21:22 UTC759 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😊В тиктоке у каждой второй положительный обзор на эти маски. Приобрела все 3 маски, буду тестить, через недельку распишу вам результат. Касаемо состава, в целом не плохой, ничего такого, поэтому после теста распишу вам насколько эти маски: 1️⃣соответствуют заявленным характеристикам; 2️⃣кому подойдут; 3️⃣стоит ли вообще на них тратить деньги. ❗️К слову, они очень бюджетные. 1 маска в зя стоит 135₽, поэтому высоки

💋8💘6🍓3

8 Nov 2025, 12:37 UTC969 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

6❤‍🔥5💘4💋2

8 Nov 2025, 12:35 UTC930 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Меня ещё так забавляет эта фраза «если вам не подошло, не значит, что крем плохой 🤬» - просто шедевр. 🍒Ага, а если будильник не будит, это не значит, что он плохой. Может, это вы просыпать не умеете? 🍒Состав – ловушка: Реклама кричит «анти-акне», а внутри — комедогенный изопропилмиристат, который поры забивает. Это как тушить пожар бензином. 🍒Обещания – ложь: Не лечит акне. Максимум — подсунет пару прыщиков, если

💋86💘5😍2

8 Nov 2025, 12:28 UTC700 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🍒Сейчас объясню, почему ваш войс полное 💩 И это не потому-что тиктокеры так сказали, а потому-что это реальный факт. Почему же я терпеть не могу этот бренд и не советую его ВАМ? 1. Обещания vs. Реальность (Главная причина) 🆒Что обещает реклама: "Избавление от прыщей", "чистая кожа", "анти-акне". 🤔Что получают многие пользователи: Отсутствие видимого результата или даже ухудшение состояния. Давайте, разберемся, чт

4💋4💘4❤‍🔥2

8 Nov 2025, 12:19 UTC522 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

4,8..Вы серьезно? А за что собственно такой рейтинг?) Крем за 300 рублей, который еще и лечит от прыщей, помогает с акне. Ну магия, чудеса.

❤‍🔥4💋3💘32

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @myyssooull. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Beauty with K” (@myyssooull), 1,279 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myyssooull.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.