t.me/jungkcrystal Tbh you look so attractive an friendly you hve a mommy said i though you are a good listener too

Channel
Timberland O' Magnificene
@mythblossom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001182915040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mythblossom |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mythblossom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 14 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 69
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 83
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
t.me/eJeffrey Tbh when u first saw you, you look very attractive dan agak pendiam gitu, ternyata lumayan friendly dan bucin juga
Sticker, posted without a caption
t.me/Lalisaz Tbh gia you hve radiates a positivity also a warmth one, you are very humble and friendly
t.me/zhanthao Aoife tbh i want to get closer with you, i think that you have a cute side alsoo your nme is so unique
t.me/aNaoi Naya tbh we didn't have any intersction but i always saw you chnnel, you have positive energy also cute side , also i a little bit curious about you, should we get closer?
t.me/Jongiin Rhygan tbh at the first time i though you are someone who really hard to approach, you have an cool side, but i was wromg
t.me/Stephecn Ichard tbh when the first time i saw you you already being one of my favorite brother, you have radiates a joyous also jamet side. Asli gk bohong lu ganteng banget adek
t.me/rSana Sharla tbh at the first time i saw you, you already being a talkactive one also funny and can get a long with all people
t.me/Jefdeukie Jeje tbh at the first time i saw you, i already can feel how warmth and positive energy you are, you have radiates a positive side also someone who is talkactive
t.me/Leehacn Tbh sawyer at the first i saw you i though you are someone that har to aproach actually i was wrong since you are a friendly one also can minggle well with everyone. Juseyo bisa stop bullu aunty gak!!??😾😾
📝 Drop @ and tbh to get the feedback 👤 @jungkcrystal, tbh, you're so pretty af. Will be a good listener if you become a friend, sangat bubbly + menggemaskan. 👤 @Lalisaz friendly humbleee bangett, ga heran kalo bisa langsungg kerasa akrab pas awal ketemu 👤 @zhanthao tbh! i think you're pretty in every aspects :] 👤 @aNaoi ; tbh aku penasaran pengen jadi temen kamu, keliatan agak serem di awal tapi ternyata ramaaah.…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mythblossom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,361,335 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mythblossom named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Timberland O' Magnificene” (@mythblossom), 1 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mythblossom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.