11 measurements spanning 9 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,471–11,574 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 22:28
11,562
+16
13 Aug 2026, 13:16
11,546
+33
12 Aug 2026, 14:06
11,513
+14
11 Aug 2026, 13:12
11,499
+5
10 Aug 2026, 13:57
11,494
-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:04
11,495
+4
8 Aug 2026, 14:08
11,491
-4
7 Aug 2026, 15:12
11,495
+7
6 Aug 2026, 12:41
11,488
+5
6 Aug 2026, 02:35
11,483
no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:48
11,483
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
193.7%
avg views ÷ 11,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
22,400
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.884%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held
11 (12 May 2026 – 17 July 2026)
Views total
22,400
Reactions total
198
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
138
Videos
26
Links
21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
41s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,175 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,252
57.6%
🔥
270
12.4%
👎
226
10.4%
👍
158
7.26%
😱
109
5.01%
🤔
53
2.44%
😢
36
1.66%
🤡
29
1.33%
😁
22
1.01%
🥰
13
0.598%
🤯
7
0.322%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
By the way, this is how the Pixel 11 Pro Fold's back looks like in Pine color!
Yes, we didn't bother adding watermarks to the leak. Don't forget to credit us thx
Does it look better than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold?
Let us know down below!
Btw stay tuned for more leaks we've got a lot to leak ;)
Hey.. no, the leaker still hasn't been fired yet!
It looks like Google's preparing a massive kernel upgrade for almost every Tensor-powered Pixel device, once again!
Let's get straight to the details:
Pixel 7 / 8 / 9 series:
6.1-android14 -> 6.12-android16
Pixel 10 series:
6.6-android15 -> 6.12-android16
Yes, as you probably noticed, the Pixel 6 isn't on the list and very likely won't get the upgrade due to its EO…
And... yeah, we're not done yet
Following tradition, here's the full Pixel 2026 (Pixel 11) series wallpapers collection.
Make sure to share them!
(although they lowkey suck 🥀)
NO WAY.. Google is finally giving users actual Material YOU 😭🎨
It looks like Google is preparing a pretty major upgrade for the Wallpaper & Style app.
We've discovered a brand-new color customization UI that allows users to manually adjust Material You colors and color variants 👀
Google added a dedicated color slider that lets users fine-tune the exact accent tone instead of being limited to the usual color palett…
After the Android Show announcement, a lot of people thought Google's about to copy Liquid Glass 😭🥀
But well.. that's not what's happening here.
Instead, it seems like Google's heavily expanding blur effects across the UI in Android 17!
From what we've seen, blur has been added to:
- Volume slider and expanded volume panel
- Power menu UI
- Lockscreen shortcuts and notifications
- Home screen context menu
We've a…
Should we post more leaks today, or keep the hype alive?
Yes73%
No9%
G-E-M-I-N-I ✨35%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
With big screens comes great expectations... maybe? 💻✨
Ahead of today's Google IO 2026 event, the overall expectations are quite high. So far, all we can do is wait a little longer and see what Google’s got up its sleeve.
But based on previous statements and rumors, Big G might finally give us a first glimpse of its upcoming Desktop OS, the one set to replace ChromeOS (possibly as early as late 2026): AluminiumOS, …
❤107🔥25👍13🤡3👎1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mysticleaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Should we post more leaks today, or keep the hype alive?
Yes73%
No9%
G-E-M-I-N-I ✨35%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 66,005 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mystic Leaks” (@mysticleaks), 11,562 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysticleaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
