2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 293–295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:15
294
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:21
294
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
69.6%
avg views ÷ 294 subscribers
Avg views / post
205
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
18 (8 June 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
819
Reactions total
82
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
138
Videos
27
Links
51
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
275 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
56
20.4%
🤪
39
14.2%
custom 5235672194473794817
32
11.6%
custom 5195114985801398949
28
10.2%
🤔
17
6.18%
custom 5192996626326625120
15
5.45%
🎃
15
5.45%
💯
15
5.45%
custom 5235511803215093297
13
4.73%
🎉
12
4.36%
🙈
11
4.00%
custom 5237911156630232962
10
3.64%
🤝
4
1.45%
✍
2
0.727%
🎄
2
0.727%
💅
2
0.727%
🐳
1
0.364%
🤡
1
0.364%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#народное
Катя (жена) продолжает обучение меня русскому языку и недавно научила шикарной фразе, которая звучит так: тут каждый суслик в поле агроном.
Говорится в ситуации, когда каждый второй человек считает своим долгом высказаться по поводу происходящего, а особенно — дать непрошенных советов, не являясь при этом экспертом в теме. Кто хоть раз жарил шашлыки в компании сразу поймет, что это за ситуация такая, я ду…
А вообще я всегда дико угораю с групп по китайскому, конечно. Конкретно — с того, сколько людей записывается и сколько остается к концу даже двухнедельного интенсива) На данный момент из 8 начавших ходят четверо
Мне кажется, мыслительный процесс у людей идет в основном примерно вот так:
— О, пойду учить китайский и стану супер востребованным, вот люди дебилы, что этого не делают! А я один такой умный!
*после трех …
нет ничего более излучающего small dick energy чем сдаваться из-за своих ошибок или когда что-то не получается сразу
(прохожу crash course по китайскому, памагити)
Оцените нейросетный перевод. Переводим реквизиты российской компании
Оригинал:
ИНН: ***
ОГРН: ***
КПП: ***
Перевод:
TIN: ***
OGRN: ***
Gearbox: ***
Думаю, всë же в ближайшее время не заменят)
(если непонел: КПП это код причины постановки на учет, он есть у юридических лиц; нейросеть не выкупила контекст и перевела как «коробка переключения передач»)
К уровням языка обязательно вернемся чуть позже, а пока свежачок.
Перевожу на мероприятии в славном городе Екатеринбурге, там целый живой реальный бельгиец должен выступать (по меркам 2026 года это реально событие, особенно вне Москвы).
В начале конференции другой чувак делает отсылку на недавний случай, когда американского футболиста на ЧМ дисквалифицировали за грубую игру, но потом Трамп позвонил в ФИФА, и дисква…
Является ли сертификат уровня С1 достаточным свидетельством того, что человек хорошо владеет языком?
А тебе что ещё надо? Конечно да42%
Сертификат — грязная зелёная бумажка, ничего не решает. Вот если ты прошёл Disco Elysium на англ...58%
Что такое С1?13%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎧Перед вами первый после долгого перерыва выпуск подкаста «Люди как книги»
Гость выпуска - переводчица с китайского и английского языков, автор канала Толмачкины сказки Екатерина Черемисинова.
📖Произведения, над переводами которых трудилась Катя: Ши Чэнь «Шанхайская головоломка», Ши Чэнь «Убийство на острове-тюрьме», Кун Кун «Стеклянный мир», Минчуань Чжу «Мрак наваждения».
🎙️В выпуске мы говорим:
✔️является ли пе…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mysli_translate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Является ли сертификат уровня С1 достаточным свидетельством того, что человек хорошо владеет языком?
А тебе что ещё надо? Конечно да42%
Сертификат — грязная зелёная бумажка, ничего не решает. Вот если ты прошёл Disco Elysium на англ...58%
Что такое С1?13%
The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мюсли злого переводчега” (@mysli_translate), 294 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysli_translate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
