Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мысль Есть 🧠

@mysli_estb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004493668923
TypeChannel
Username@mysli_estb
DescriptionНовый проект от создателей Пир Есть и Выпить Есть. Этот канал не о еде и напитках, а полезных и правильных мыслях. Здесь мы будем говорить только о серьезных вещах и на серьезные темы. Добро пожаловать 🤗
Created6 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mysli_estb

Growth

857 August 2026 — 85 subscribers9 August 2026 — 85 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:4885no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:1785first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.2%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.0
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held16 (6 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total260
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Videos
3
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 00s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1664.0%
416.0%
👍312.0%
👏14.00%
🥰14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mysli_estb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тоска — одно из самых глубоких и трудноуловимых слов русского языка. Его действительно невозможно перевести одним английским словом, потому что оно описывает целый спектр сложных чувств, для которых в английском нет единого понятия. Вот что подразумевает под собой «тоска»: Тоска — это не просто грусть. Это смесь, комбинация следующих чувств, в зависимости от контекста: · Экзистенциальная, метафизическая тоска — не

👍2

23 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Это сильная и глубокая мысль, которая переворачивает привычное восприятие денег с ног на голову. Давайте разберемся в чем тут дело?! Действительно, время — это не просто «ещё одна валюта», это единственный по-настоящему конечный и невосполнимый ресурс. Деньги можно заработать, потерять и снова заработать. Время же тратится безвозвратно. Вот несколько граней того, почему время — «единственная валюта»: 1. Обменный к

🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 11:44 UTC56 views2 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Чтение книг — не просто обязанность, а тренажерный зал для ума и эмпатии. Это не про «надо», а про то, как стать сложнее, глубже и свободнее. Вот главные причины: 1. Развитие мышления: от клипов к структуре Книга (особенно длинная) учит выстраивать длинные логические цепочки и удерживать внимание часами — навык, который умирает в эпоху коротких видео. Это единственный способ понять сложное, не упрощая его до примити

🔥2

15 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC81 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Некое дополнение из Библии( Новый Завет): 1-е Коринфянам 13:4-8 — это знаменитый «гимн любви» апостола Павла. Вот этот отрывок в Синодальном переводе: ⁴ Любовь долготерпит, милосердствует, любовь не завидует, любовь не превозносится, не гордится, ⁵ не бесчинствует, не ищет своего, не раздражается, не мыслит зла, ⁶ не радуется неправде, а сорадуется истине; ⁷ все покрывает, всему верит, всего надеется, все переносит.

2👏1🔥1🥰1

8 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC129 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Вот и притча про любовь ❤️ Поздравляю Вас с «Днём Семьи, Любви и Верности»

🔥41

8 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC133 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

А сегодня у нас рубрика, Великие философы. И тут особняком стоит, Омар Хайям — мастер парадокса, и за внешней гедонистической бравадой в его рубаи почти всегда скрыта глубокая философская драма. Давайте возьмем одно из самых известных и, на первый взгляд, «бунтарских» его четверостиший. Вот классический перевод Осипа Румера: «Мы источник веселья — и скорби рудник, Мы вместилище скверны — и чистый родник. Человек, с

🔥2

7 Jul 2026, 07:31 UTC143 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://telegra.ph/Segodnya-tema-ochen-lichnaya-nasushchnaya-i-ne-prostaya-chto-zhe-takoe-lyubov-07-07-2

1

6 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC161 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В эпоху тотальной прозрачности конфиденциальность — это не просто уединение, а стратегический ресурс и власть. Давайте разберем, в чем именно заключается эта сила. 1. Контроль над нарративом Тот, кто владеет вашей информацией, может предсказывать ваши действия и манипулировать ими. · Суть силы: Вы сами решаете, какую версию себя показать миру. Отсутствие информации о вас лишает других рычагов давления. Когда никто

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @mysli_estb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,192,249 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мысль Есть 🧠” (@mysli_estb), 85 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mysli_estb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.