Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for любовь на книжных полках ♡

Channel

любовь на книжных полках ♡

@mypromisedlove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,330subscribers

+101 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001420702884
TypeChannel
Username@mypromisedlove
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mypromisedlove

Growth

1,2291,3421,285.58 August 2026 — 1,229 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,229 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,231 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,278 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,296 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,301 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,333 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,342 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,340 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,330 subscribers1,3308 August 20262 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net +101. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,212–1,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 13:361,330-10
30 Aug 2026, 11:541,340-2
27 Aug 2026, 07:131,342+9
24 Aug 2026, 17:361,333+32
21 Aug 2026, 03:331,301+5
18 Aug 2026, 11:131,296+18
15 Aug 2026, 08:431,278+47
11 Aug 2026, 18:321,231+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:331,229no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:351,229first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.1%
avg views ÷ 1,330 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
92.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (25 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total483
Reactions total445
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,257 reactions across 8 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.01% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5445323798893067737635.01%
custom 5233557898038111566594.69%
custom 5296672021546049127584.61%
custom 5296482162516726104574.53%
custom 5231108370815022833514.06%
custom 5233288685193034987514.06%
custom 5253621262235748890493.90%
custom 5445120054234481798493.90%
custom 5233429663199556753483.82%
custom 5425007005855140250483.82%
custom 5460969776341861987473.74%
custom 5190455066544336452463.66%
custom 5260707107870631359463.66%
custom 5440569755427708774463.66%
custom 5440354560386304815453.58%
custom 5321459789639725576443.50%
custom 5393580670020761765443.50%
custom 5413531381521205887443.50%
custom 5233335298473098776423.34%
custom 5377579026330171321413.26%
12 further kinds27922.2%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:22 UTC110 views117 reactionsread 8 August 2026

☕️🤩 — прочитано уже чуть больше половины «анны карениной» и хочу сказать, что складывается чувство, будто толстой просто смеялся над своими же персонажами и старался с каждой новой главой сделать их мысли более нелепыми, смешными и амбивалентными

custom 523333529847309877642custom 523325536054178428437custom 523349791022989422534custom 52357572734809830904

6 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC161 views159 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 542500700585514025048custom 519045506654433645246custom 532145978963972557644custom 537967342418239535121

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC212 views169 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«если бы мы были злодеями» м.л. рио — 9/10 — акт первый, романтика и стекло. эстетика, восторг и то самое редкое чувство, когда в финале все пазлы наконец складываются в идеальную картину 🤯🏺 если вы любите dark academia в духе «тайной истории» донны тартт (📒) с закрытыми учебными заведениями, шекспировской драмой и флёром легкого детектива, проходите, располагайтесь. М. Л. Рио написала роман, который буквально дышит

custom 523110837081502283351custom 523328868519303498751custom 523342966319955675348custom 533686518449547538619

1 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC295 views149 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 544056975542770877446custom 544035456038630481545custom 543848602197927963841custom 544066725548029265217

31 Jul 2026, 22:32 UTC354 views144 reactionsread 8 August 2026

августом налюбуешься и трудности скинешь с себя слой за слоем. помни, пожалуйста, что всё конечно. даже самое-самое зло.

custom 539358067002076176544custom 541353138152120588744custom 537757902633017132141custom 524932341731165808815

31 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC338 views181 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

my current reading: "если бы мы были злодеями" и "анна каренина"

custom 544532379889306773763custom 523355789803811156659custom 544512005423448179849custom 523323688359247442110

25 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC451 views156 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 546096977634186198747custom 526070710787063135946custom 537995297930872431241custom 541832230157577701122

25 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC387 views182 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

я, когда мне говорят, что я талантливый человек и что я вдохновляю (считаю, что это лучший комплимент из всех возможных)

custom 529667202154604912758custom 529648216251672610457custom 525362126223574889049custom 529646079075946247218

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @mypromisedlove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 415,020 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“любовь на книжных полках ♡” (@mypromisedlove), 1,330 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mypromisedlove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.