Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Драмиона - моя Римская Империя

Channel

Драмиона - моя Римская Империя

@mynamekattya666

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,091subscribers

+111 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003924254369
TypeChannel
Username@mynamekattya666
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mynamekattya666

Growth

3,9804,0914,035.57 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,021 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,091 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,963–4,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:544,091+70
10 Aug 2026, 00:414,021+40
7 Aug 2026, 09:253,981+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:483,980first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.1%
avg views ÷ 4,091 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,640
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total29,521
Reactions total1,479
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 27s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,479 reactions across 18 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38626.1%
🔥31321.2%
custom 532826440940601748621914.8%
🤣1006.76%
🤩865.81%
custom 5325561620846385372674.53%
custom 5456557324510457204543.65%
custom 5456343619822705624493.31%
😍453.04%
❤‍🔥412.77%
custom 5287689801821068992261.76%
😈251.69%
🥰191.28%
custom 5379908629476438226161.08%
💘161.08%
custom 541790825384355091380.541%
custom 532808184323116600950.338%
👍40.27%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,479reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mynamekattya666. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC571 views83 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я в Китае 😁Нихао йопты😁

custom 532826440940601748651custom 532556162084638537220custom 545655732451045720412

7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC≈1,360 views99 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Мой педагог по режиссуре где-то очень нервно курит , повторяя что лучше мне оставаться на сцене , а не создавать её 🤣но я очень хотела воплотить свой любимый фильм , но не совсем вышло , но громко не смеемся и делаем вид, что ничего так .. А я уже на низком старте в аэропорт .

custom 545634361982270562446🔥3315custom 53255616208463853725

6 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC≈1,540 views27 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Я тоже хочу обои для канала , я их даже уже сгенерировала , но никогда не набираю голосов , ну а вдруг 😁💓 https://t.me/boost/mynamekattya666

custom 532556162084638537223custom 52876898018210689924

6 Aug 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,590 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026

С 7.08 по 16.08 я буду в отпуске , буду постить по мере возможностей интернета 🩷не теряйте💋

67custom 54563436198227056243

6 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,640 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Подборка Рону нехорошо или Уизли Гады😁 Список фф Приятные ошибки Ошибка по Фрейду Рону нехорошо Teach Me How to Forget / Научи меня забывать Обратимость Come to claim Любовь под контролем Come find me

67🔥7custom 53799086294764382262🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,450 views73 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dracos_wandPhoto

Авторизация пройдена или два сантиметра превосходства. Драко Малфой / Гермиона Грейнджер Теодор Нотт Рон Уизли Рейтинг: NC-17 Саркастическая грязная комедия в двух половых актах. Юмор. Мат. Грубый секс. Зелья. — Зелье доведено до идеала, — закончил Драко, глядя на реакцию. — Она ничего не заподозрит, Тео. Потому что сегодня вечер, когда «Рон» вернётся домой не усталым неудачником, а мужчиной, который возьмёт её

39🔥28🥰6

5 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈1,680 views106 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Время зарисовок 🤣 Драко флиртует , или где то ржут Тео и Блейз ,💯 их советы 😁

🤣86🔥9custom 53282644094060174868custom 545655732451045720421

5 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,740 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«На крыльях крови» Брайер Болейн 🖤Главная героиня: Медра Пендрагон считает себя последней всадницей драконов в мире, где самих драконов уже не осталось. 🖤Сюжет: Вампиры похищают героиню и отправляют её в Академию «Кровавое крыло», где правит высокородная элита, а слабые становятся пешками. 🖤Главный герой: Блейк Дракхарроу — холодный и высокомерный красавец, с которым Медра оказывается помолвлена из-за древнего ритуа

38

4 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC≈1,640 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dracomaniaaVideo

Я тоже не могу перестать тебя снимать🫠 -Малыш…ты вообще знаешь,насколько ты красивый? -Ты опять меня снимаешь? -Ничего не могу поделать… -Тогда не останавливайся… 🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹 #теонотт@dracomaniaa #теопэнс@dracomaniaa

😍45custom 532826440940601748620custom 528768980182106899284

4 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,390 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @whitemills_ffVideo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Это должна была быть ОДНА зарисовка, как бы предыстория видео под звуки Сумерек 🧛‍♀️ НО! Вмешались голоса в голове и предложили сделать СЕРИАЛ (ну, маленький такой, не как Daddy на три сезона. Так ведь...ТАК ВЕДЬ? 🥺) Минута кокетства: давайте представим, что нет косяков с цветокором и кукольными лицами, потому что я сегодня чуть не заплакала, тратя токены 😢 Я надеюсь снова вытянуть вайбом, юмором и

🔥31custom 52876898018210689928custom 545655732451045720465

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mynamekattya666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 467,750 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Драмиона - моя Римская Империя” (@mynamekattya666), 4,091 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mynamekattya666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.