Channel
@mylingvarium
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
135subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002184477329 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mylingvarium |
| Description | 🇺🇸🇹🇷🇫🇷🇮🇹 Про английский и другие языки, их изучение и лингвокоучинг. Записаться на консультацию @Kysen |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mylingvarium |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 135 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
153 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 22.2% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 16.3% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 10.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 4.58% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 3.92% | |
| 🌭 | 5 | 3.27% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.61% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.96% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 1.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 4 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
IN AT TO Знаете, что объединяет эти три предлога? Все они могут переводиться как “в”. Предлоги вообще штука непростая - мало того, что их чертова гора, так еще и просто выучить их как обычно парами слово/перевод невозможно, потому что что? Правильно, все зависит от контекста! Именно поэтому так много людей путается, когда нужно сказать “в” применительно к месту. Естественно, мозг в условиях стресса от разговора на ин…
🔥10❤5❤🔥2
Что-то молчание затянулось) Это знаете, бывает, ты думаешь про человека: надо написать/позвонить/узнать как дела, надо-надо-надо, и все забываешь, откладываешь и никак не руки не доходят. Так и тут. На самом деле к осени, конечно, всегда появляется больше учеников, а значит, больше времени уходит на подготовку к занятиям и сами занятия, а написать уже не остается сил. Но я исправлюсь и вернусь к регулярным постам. А …
❤15❤🔥3🔥2👍1
Наконец удалось искупаться во всех четырех турецких морях за сезон 😍
🔥15👍5🌭3❤2🐳1
Некоторые уроки проходят со строгим супервизором
😁18❤4🌭2
Вчера, в день учителя, вспоминали с @anya_blangiardo нашу школьную учительницу по техперу Аллу Павловну, в народе алку-палку. Несмотря на несколько пренебрежительное прозвище, женщина была абсолютно легендарная и хоть мы над не и посмеивались, а уважали. Она была личностью противоречивой: с одной стороны, носила кожаные юбки, красную помаду и безупречное каре, что меня лично восхищало. С другой - могла вдруг резко и …
❤9🔥7
Fun vs. Funny Казалось бы, какие проблемы, fun - это существительное, а funny - прилагательное, вот и весь сказ, но нет. Дело в том, что оба они могут быть прилагательными, и когда вы хотите сказать “веселый”, говорить надо fun, а не funny. Обычно мысль идет так: веселый, что-то со смехом, ага, funny. Нет, funny - это “смешной”, как шутка там, анекдот. То есть: funny - смешной, обхохочешься fun - веселый, развлекател…
🤯4👍1
Идеальная погода для прогулок и котиков
❤14👍3❤🔥2🐳1
Пояснять шутки, конечно, дело последнее, но мы тут образовательный контент пилим, или где. В общем, фамилия Райана Гослинга (gosling) означает “гусенок”. И шутка в том, что негоже уже в его возрасте в гусятах ходить, пора превращаться в важного Гуся. Кстати, о детях животных. В далеком 2005 году я начала работать переводчиком при одном ныне почившем дико дорогом эксклюзивном ателье в Екатеринбурге, куда приезжали по…
👍6😁5🙈3❤1
Поняли шутку?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣6😁2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mylingvarium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Поняли шутку?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 4 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,299,741 of 1,624,904entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ksenia's Linguarium” (@mylingvarium), 135 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mylingvarium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.