10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,020–1,212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 00:35
1,043
-7
26 Aug 2026, 23:47
1,050
-48
23 Aug 2026, 19:05
1,098
-77
20 Aug 2026, 10:43
1,175
-15
17 Aug 2026, 19:07
1,190
+132
14 Aug 2026, 16:04
1,058
+16
11 Aug 2026, 05:42
1,042
-1
8 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,043
-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:20
1,044
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:09
1,044
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.09%
avg views ÷ 1,043 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.4
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
83.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
422
Reactions total
354
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,413 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5463208038418643620
510
36.1%
custom 5463407389325685283
458
32.4%
💘
445
31.5%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,413reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mykindchannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы не обязаны всю жизнь жить с реакциями, которые когда-то помогали вам выжить
То, что когда-то было защитой, сегодня может мешать.🫸
Например:
💗постоянно ждать плохого;
💗бояться доверять;
💗искать угрозу там, где её нет;
💗быть слишком требовательным к себе.
Наши реакции появились не просто так.
Когда-то они помогали справляться.
Но со временем мы можем научиться по-другому реагировать на жизнь.
💗Прошлое нельзя …
Память есть не только у разума, но и у нашей нервной системы‼️
Иногда мы можем понимать:
💗«Сейчас я в безопасности».
💗«Этот человек - не тот, кто причинил мне боль раньше».
💗«Эта ситуация другая».
Но внутри всё равно появляется тревога, напряжение или желание защищаться.🇺🇿
💗Так работает наша психика.
Опыт прошлого формирует наши реакции, убеждения и способы справляться с трудностями.
Особенно если когда-то ситу…
Почему мы иногда реагируем не на ситуацию, а на старую боль?👇
Иногда происходит что-то незначительное:
💗Кто-то не ответил на сообщение.
💗Нас раскритиковали.
💗Близкий человек стал холоднее.
И вдруг внутри появляется сильная тревога, обида или страх.⚡
Кажется: «Почему меня так задело?»
Потому что иногда наша реакция связана не только с настоящим моментом.
💗За ней могут стоять прошлый опыт, старые переживания и чу…
Иногда кажется, что всё идёт своим чередом, но внутри остаётся ощущение пустоты. Будто дни проходят один за другим, а настоящая жизнь всё время откладывается.🫸
🎤В этом выпуске поговорим о том, почему так происходит, как хронический стресс и постоянное «надо» заставляют нас жить на автопилоте и что помогает снова почувствовать себя живым человеком.
💗В конце вас ждёт небольшая практика, которая поможет переключить вн…
Сегодня не пытайтесь изменить всю свою жизнь.☯️
Попробуйте сделать одну маленькую вещь, которая порадует именно вас:
💗Выпить любимый кофе без спешки.
💗Пройтись без телефона.
💗Послушать музыку.🎷
💗Позвонить человеку, по которому скучаете.
Давайте сместим фокус немного на себя и почувствуем вкус этой прекрасной жизни 🫶
Почему мы живём на автопилоте?
💗Это не лень. И не отсутствие мотивации.
Когда психика долго находится в напряжении, она включает режим энергосбережения. Это защитный механизм, который помогает справляться с нагрузкой.👍
В этом состоянии человек перестаёт замечать свои желания. Живёт по привычке. Откладывает отдых, радость, себя- «на потом».
Именно поэтому многие говорят: «Я не понимаю, чего хочу» или «Будто жизнь …
Проснуться.
Работа.
Дом.
Дела.
Сон.
💗И так снова.
День за днём.
Постепенно жизнь превращается в бесконечный список задач, а однаждыприходит мысль:
«Кажется, я просто существую.»
Мы настолько привыкаем жить в режиме«надо», что перестаём замечать маленькие моменты, которые делают нас счастливыми: тёплый солнечный луч, любимую музыку, искренний разговор, чашку кофе без спешки, улыбку близкого человека.😊
Жизнь проход…
🎙Сегодня в подкасте говорю о том, почему мы часто тянемся к неподходящим людям в любви и как наши детские переживания могут влиять на выбор партнера. 🔝
А также, как различие в пережитых сценариях формирует наши отношения и что делать, чтобы научиться чувствовать настоящую любовь, а не старые шаблоны.
💗Слушайте с любовью 🫶
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mykindchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психология без воды/Татьяна Гудкова” (@mykindchannel), 1,043 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mykindchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
