Recorded in 2019 as “Myindustry|مرجع مدیریت و بازاریابی” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,182–4,209 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 22:24
4,206
+10
9 Aug 2026, 17:52
4,196
+11
6 Aug 2026, 04:07
4,185
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:05
4,185
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.3%
avg views ÷ 4,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,740
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
15 (22 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
13,909
Reactions total
857
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
10m 22s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,383 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,382
99.9%
👎
1
0.072%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,383reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
پدیده #اوزمپیک در #اقتصاد دارویی جهان حالا به شکل #اسپارتینا در اقتصاد ایران به نوعی در حال تکرار است
اعداد بازار #لاغری واقعا بزرگ است! در هر حوزهای هستید، حتی اگر مستقیما در بازار دارو و درمان فعال نیستید، احتمالا فضا برای ایفای نقش غیرمستقیم شما و سهم گرفتن از این بازار برایتان فراهم است.
@myindustry
یک نکته مهم: موضوع این ویدئو مقایسه پزشکی یا مکانیسم اثر داروها نیست. ممنون میشوم بحث را به تفاوتهایی مانند ای…
پیشنهاد کتاب:
کتاب کسب و کار خانوادگی به هر کسی که در یک کسب و کار خانوادگی یا Family Business است کمک جدّی میکند.
فرقی نمیکند شما در کسب و کار خانوادگی به عنوان مالک و مدیر مشغول هستید یا کارمند یکی از اقوام خود هستید! این کتاب به هر حال برای شما ضروری است.
برای تهیه کتاب روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید:
https://myindustry.ir/shop/management-books/family-business-harvard/
همان طور که 77% دوستان درست پاسخ دادند، کمپین سارا کمترین هزینه جذب مشتری را دارد.
اصطلاح CAC که مخفف Customer Acquisition Cost است، از طریق تقسیم کل هزینه تبلیغات به تعداد مشتریانی که جذب شده به دست میآید.
@myindustry
🔴 آیا حضور در #تبلیغ یا تلاش برای #فروش دونِ شأن است؟
🔹
به پسر جوانی که آموزش زبان میداد گفتم،《حالا که فالوئر کافی داری، وقتشه در یک ویدئو مخاطب را دعوت به ثبتنام در کلاس آنلاین کنی》گفت :
ولی آخه این زشت نیست که من تبلیغ کنم؟؟
🔹
این ویدئو از #بیل_گیتس با آن حجم #سرمایه و #دارایی و شهرت را به او نشان دادم! و اشاره کردم چرا《تو》نباید تبلیغ کنی؟
چرا در فرهنگ ما تلاش برای فروختنِ محصولی شایسته، رفتاری ناشایست است؟ خب ا…
🔴 خروج از دایره امن
بله، اگر به طور ناخواسته دایره امنِ #شهاب_حسینی از بین نرفته بود، او احتمالا یک مجری ساده بدون هیچ اثر شاخصی بود!
🔹️
باید بپذیریم موفقیتهای چشمگیر و بزرگ، سهمِ کسانی است که از دایره امن خارج میشوند!
🔹️
اما آیا همه کسانی که از آن دایره خارج میشوند موفق هستند؟ آماری از آنهایی که اداره منابعانسانی سازمان صدا و سیما اعلام عدم نیاز کرد و از آنها #سوپراستار ساخته نشد، داریم؟ یا چون آنها انسانها…
🔴 چرا بعضی تیمها با وجود افراد توانمند، شکست میخورند؟
دو عامل رایج اما کمتر دیدهشده:
۱. مدیریت جزئی (Micromanagement) وقتی مدیر در همه جزئیات دخالت میکند، اختیار، انگیزه و خلاقیت تیم کاهش پیدا میکند.
۲. اعتماد بیش از حد (Overtrust) اعتماد بدون شفافیت، پاسخگویی و ارزیابی، بهتدریج کیفیت تصمیمها و عملکرد تیم را کاهش میدهد.
تیمهای موفق، بین اعتماد و نظارت تعادل ایجاد میکنند؛ نه کنترل افراطی و نه رهاسازی کامل…
🔴 در مدیریت منابع انسانی، شناخت واقعی افراد در روزهای آرام اتفاق نمیافتد.
@myindustry
فشار، بحران و مسئولیتپذیری، بهترین آزمون برای شناخت شخصیت، تعهد و بلوغ حرفهای اعضای یک تیم هستند.
استخدام مهم است؛ اما نگهداشت و شناخت سرمایه انسانی، هنر واقعی مدیریت است.
@myindustry
🔴 حالا #بنز خودش رانندگی میکند
ما ایرانیها اگرچه هیچوقت در نیمقرن گذشته دسترسی خوبی به #خودرو نداشتیم، اما با عشق به #خودرو و نگهداری عکس #ماشین و رویاپردازی درباره آن و کارتبازی ماشین! کاملا آشنا هستیم.
🔹️
در این #تبلیغ که #اعتماد_به_نفس #بدند #مرسدس_بنز به وضوح در آن دیده میشود، ضمن بیان خفیفِ قابلیت رانندگی خودکار، به خوبی عشق به بنز را به تصویر میکشد.
#تبلیغی که ساختن و بهره بردن از آن به برندی در حد و اند…
🔴 #تبلیغ جذاب #آژانس_مسافرتی
علیرغمِ اینکه چند سالی است، تقریبا همه شرایط محیطی به ضرر صنعت #گردشگری تغییر کرده است، اما یکی از فعالترین کسب و کارهای بخش خصوصی در #تبلیغات، همین صنعت مظلوم است.
❌️افزایش شدید قیمت ارز
❌️کاهش قدرت خرید
❌️کاهش تنوع مقاصد پروازهای خارجی از ایران
❌️دشوارتر شدن صدور ویزا
❌️کووید۱۹
❌️افزایش جدّی تنش در ایران
✅️افزایش قدرت خرید مصرفکننده نسبت به قیمت بنزین و افزایش سفرهای زمینی (به عنوان…
🔴 تاکید بر قابلیت اعتماد
شناسایی اینکه، مزیت اصلی و ویژگی محوری محصول/سرویس ما چیست خیلی مهمه. خیلی از مواقع شرکتها در #تبلیغات محصول از ویژگی محوریِ خود فاصله میگیرند.
🔹️
مثلا فرض کنید یک داروی گیاهی که ویژگیِ محوریاش درمان یک بیماری است، بر طعم خوبش در #تبلیغ خود تاکید کند و یک #فست_فود بر غذاهایِ سالم خود !!
🔹️
در اینجا شرکت آمریکایی که کارش ذخیرهسازی اطلاعات است، بر Reliability تاکید کرده، که دقیقا ویژگی مح…
👍59
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @myindustry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 323,247 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Myindustry|مدیریت و بازاریابی” (@myindustry), 4,206 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myindustry.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.