Channel
@myetherwallet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,408subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001212737856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @myetherwallet |
| Created | 5 March 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/myetherwallet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 4,408 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 4,402 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 4,399 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 4,399 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 5 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
182 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 87 | 47.8% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 19.2% | |
| 👍 | 32 | 17.6% | |
| 🤩 | 18 | 9.89% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 2.20% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.10% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.549% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.549% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 September 2024 to 23 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Up to $100,000 of tokenized stocks and exclusive STONKS NFTs are up for grabs! Hope you been collecting MEW Universe Energy anon 🥂 Spend your Energy for a chance to win tokenized $TSLA, $NVDA, $GOOGL, $COIN, $AMZN, $QQQ and more! Get started on MEW mobile ⤵️ https://download.mewwallet.com
❤29🔥12👍2🤔1
We're currently running a campaign where if you swap $10 or more on MEW Portfolio you will receive $5 USDC for free!!! Check it out below ⤵️ https://x.com/myetherwallet/status/2039096086086766845
❤6🤩4🔥3
Slay 2025 with a wallet that truly loves you back (unlike your ex smh). Our newest version of Enkrypt is finally here and better than ever before: 👾 Pin your favorite networks 👾 New swaps, chains and more 👾 Chonky new buttons (oh lawdy they comin 👀) It isn't 2020 anymore. Don't settle for a janky browser wallet 🫠 Level up onchain with Enkrypt. 👉 https://www.enkrypt.com/download.html
🤩7❤4🔥3
Ever sent a text message onchain? 💬 You read that right. In case you didn't know - you can attach text to onchain transactions! 🤯 Follow the instruction in our guide for help sending messages onchain! ✨👇 https://www.myetherwallet.com/blog/how-to-send-a-message-onchain/
❤9🤯3👍1🔥1
Did you know that if someone has your wallet address, they can see your entire onchain history? 🥷 It's a huge reason why onchain privacy is vital, and why we're working with COTI Network to figure it out. MEW COO Brian Norton touches on the topic in the clip above.
❤7👍4
Blockchain Rollups might seem intimidating and super-technical at first glance, but once it clicks the tech starts to make a lot of sense. 💡✨ Curious about how rollups work? 🗞️ Read our recent ELI5: Blockchain Rollups blog piece below! 👉 https://www.myetherwallet.com/blog/eli5-blockchain-rollups-optimistic-and-zero-knowledge/
👍5❤2
You've heard of fruit rollups... 🍓🍉🍒🍑 Now get ready for... ⋆˚｡✴︎⋆📜 ✨Blockchain Rollups✨ 📜 ⋆✴︎˚｡⋆ Rollups make using crypto sweeter by reducing fees and improving transaction speeds. Learn about the different types and how they work 👇 https://www.myetherwallet.com/blog/eli5-blockchain-rollups-optimistic-and-zero-knowledge/
❤5🔥3
It's only a matter of time before institutions begin storing sensitive information like medical records or credit history onchain. 🗄️🔐 This is just one reason why it's vital to have the option of transacting privately. 💯 Listen to our COO Brian Norton's thoughts in the clip above! https://x.com/myetherwallet/status/1861843239621234724
👍5
Privacy was a hot topic at DevCon this year, and we're excited to be figuring it out with COTI Network! 🤜🤛 Check out the clip above to hear our Head of Content and Community speak on privacy onchain with COTI! https://x.com/myetherwallet/status/1858602433443754122
❤4
Currently locked in at De.Fi World 2024 🔐 Say what’s up if you see us around! 🫵🤠
❤9👍3
We recently added Arbitrum support to MEW mobile 🔵✨ Check out our guides below for help bridging to and swapping on Arbitrum! Bridge to Arbitrum: https://www.myetherwallet.com/blog/how-to-bridge-from-ethereum-to-arbitrum-using-mew-mobile/ Swap on Arbitrum: https://www.myetherwallet.com/blog/how-to-swap-on-arbitrum-using-mew-mobile/
🔥5👏2❤1
Being the point-of-entry for new crypto users isn't easy but we love it! 🥰 Listen to Head of Content and Community at MEW, Katya Michaels, speak about the importance of privacy with COTI Network below. How do YOU think private transaction UI should look in MEW? https://x.com/myetherwallet/status/1854222297952846080
❤4👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @myetherwallet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 442,672 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MEW | MyEtherWallet” (@myetherwallet), 4,408 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/myetherwallet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.