... β£ @My_thought18

Channel
βοΈ π πͺπ·ππΈπΆ π£π±πΈπΎπ°π±π½
@my_thought18
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,156subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001308026549 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @my_thought18 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/my_thought18 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 1,156 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 1,154 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 1,153 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 1,157 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 1,160 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 1,158 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 1,155 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 1,152 | +6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 1,146 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:36 | 1,141 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 1,140 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 22 | 61.1% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 6 | 16.7% | |
| β‘ | 4 | 11.1% | |
| π | 3 | 8.33% | |
| π | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 18 we hold a reading for Β· 11%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @my_thought18. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 April 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
... β£ @My_thought18
β€2
... β£ @My_thought18
π1
... β£ @My_thought18
β€1
... β£ @My_thought18
β€βπ₯1
... β£ @My_thought18
β‘2β€2
βοΈ π πͺπ·ππΈπΆ π£π±πΈπΎπ°π±π½ pinned Β«About Her Love is something else. I mean, a lot of people say they have their definition for love, but it's hard to give just one definition or interpretation. It's something indescribable. It's a feeling, you know? You can't always say it, but you can feelβ¦Β»
βοΈ π πͺπ·ππΈπΆ π£π±πΈπΎπ°π±π½ pinned Β«The Last Piece I hope you don't miss out on your life trying to get it together. Because here's the truth no one tells you while you're waiting: Getting it together is not a destination. It's a rhythm β a slow, messy, beautiful dance of falling and risingβ¦Β»
... β£ @My_thought18
... β£ @My_thought18
... β£ @My_thought18
... β£ @My_thought18
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @my_thought18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Profile_Pictures_Photos_Images Β· 40,089
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 43 here β alongside 42 others β read 30 August 2026
@AiapgetMadeEasyOfficialChannal Β· 22,636
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here β alongside 72 others β read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββοΈ π πͺπ·ππΈπΆ π£π±πΈπΎπ°π±π½β (@my_thought18), 1,156 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/my_thought18.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.