Channel
@mvdri
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,313subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001451722663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mvdri |
| Created | 6 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mvdri |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 2,313 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 2,315 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,315 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,789 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 63.2% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 21.1% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В лагере «Молодой патриот» прошли показательные выступления для детей, состоящих на профильном учете, под эгидой министерства внутренних дел Накануне в лагере «Молодой патриот» прошла специальная программа, организованная для детей, состоящих на профилактическом учёте, а также для участников движения «Юнармия». В мероприятии приняли участие начальник отделения организации деятельности участковых уполн…
Photo, posted without a caption
Жителей Ингушетии предупреждают о новой схеме мошенников Мошенничество с упоминанием банков и государственных органов становится всё более популярным у преступников. Чтобы втереться в доверие, злоумышленники теперь представляются сотрудниками банков, госструктур и других организаций. Самая распространённая схема строится на страхе. Вам звонят, представляясь сотрудником банка, сообщают о попытке кражи средств и треб…
Член Общественного совета при региональном МВД и представитель ЦПЭ МВД по Республике Ингушетия выступили на форуме «Таргим» в рамках акции «Каникулы с Общественным советом»: с лекцией о профилактике экстремизма, ксенофобии, наркомании и этике в соцсетях Накануне в Джейрахском районе Республики Ингушетия в рамках Всероссийского молодёжного образовательного форума «Таргим», на базе лечебно‑оздоровительного ко…
Photo, posted without a caption
В результате противоправных действий маркетплейсу причинен материальный ущерб на общую сумму 265 тысяч 175 рублей. 5 августа 2026 года следственным отделом МО МВД России «Сунженский» в отношении злоумышленника возбуждено уголовное дело по п. «в» ч. 3 ст. 158 УК РФ (кража, совершённая в крупном размере). В настоящее время в отношении подозреваемого избрана мера пресечения в виде подписки о невыезде и надлежащем пове…
⚡️Тело утонувшего мужчины обнаружено. В Сунженском районе завершена поисковая операция. Сегодня, 5 августа, в 16:20 тело гражданина, поиски которого длились более двух недель, было обнаружено между сельскими поселениями Мужичи и Алкун. В поисках были задействованы сотрудники полиции Ингушетии, спасатели ГУ МЧС России по Республике Ингушетия и МЧС республики, бойцы Росгвардии Чеченской Республики, а также добровольц…
👍3
📺 Программа "Магас Лайф" подняла две важные темы в своем эфире: недопустимость стрельбы на свадьбах и трагедии, связанные с электросамокатами. На вопросы ведущего ответили заместитель начальника Управления организации охраны общественного порядка (УОООП) МВД по Республике Ингушетия Адам Мургустов и старший инспектор отдела пропаганды Управления Госавтоинспекции МВД по Республике Ингушетия Людмила Берсенева.
👍1
Как пояснил Муса Якубович Гадиев, комплексный подход к оценке позволяет объективно определить готовность сотрудника к выполнению более ответственных задач и дальнейшему служебному росту. Магомедсали Салманович Котиев отметил, что большинство аттестуемых уверенно отвечали на поставленные вопросы, продемонстрировали хорошее знание нормативных документов, а также обладали необходимым опытом и профессиональными качества…
👍1
Представители Общественного совета и Совета ветеранов приняли участие в работе аттестационной комиссии регионального МВД Накануне в региональном МВД состоялось заседание аттестационной комиссии, в работе которой приняли участие член Общественного совета при ГУ МВД России по СКФО Муса Якубович Гадиев и председатель Совета ветеранов ОВД и ВВ МВД по Республике Ингушетия Магомедсали Салманович Котиев. В ходе заседания …
❤2
Розыгрыш Умры оказался ловушкой: МВД расследует мошенничество на 100 тысяч рублей, жительница республики стала жертвой кибераферистов Министерство внутренних дел по Республике Ингушетия информирует граждан о выявленной схеме хищения денежных средств с использованием популярных мессенджеров. По факту совершения противоправных действий возбуждено уголовное дело. 31 июля 2026 года в дежурную часть МВД по Республике Ин…
🤔1
В Ингушетии задержаны трое подозреваемых в убийстве в Сунженском районе Сотрудники Центра противодействия экстремизму, оперативники Управления уголовного розыска МВД по Республике Ингушетия и отдела уголовного розыска МО МВД России «Сунженский» совместно с коллегами из УФСБ России по Республике Ингушетия при участии следователей регионального Следственного комитета задержали троих подозреваемых в убийстве, совершённ…
🤯2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mvdri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 283,785 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“06.mvd” (@mvdri), 2,313 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mvdri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.