Channel
@muyassarzoda_fayzieva
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,221subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003243326220 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @muyassarzoda_fayzieva |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/muyassarzoda_fayzieva |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 2,221 | +53 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 2,168 | +5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 2,163 | +5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:19 | 2,158 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 2,166 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 2,172 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 2,170 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 2,175 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 2,162 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 2,169 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 2,175 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 2,170 | +12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 2,158 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 2,155 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
294 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 126 | 42.9% | |
| ❤ | 103 | 35.0% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 13.6% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 4.76% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.68% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.34% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.34% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📋 OAK ro'yxati — TO'LIQ jadval (1704 ta jurnal) O'zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy attestatsiya komissiyasi Rayosatining qarorlari bilan tasdiqlangan "Dissertatsiyalar asosiy ilmiy natijalarini chop etish tavsiya etilgan ilmiy nashrlar ro'yxati" — 2017–2026 yillar oralig'idagi barcha 1704 ta jurnal bitta jadvalda. 📁 Jadvalda nimalar bor: — 24 fan sohasi (fizika-matematikadan islomshunoslikkacha); — Har bir jurnalning n…
👍7❤6🔥4
📢 XALQARO JURNAL MAQOLANGIZNI QAYTARSA — YANGI JURNAL IZLASHDA ADABIYOTLARINGIZ O'ZI YECHIMINI KO'RSATADI Yangi videoda — "Digital Transformation and Society" (DTS) jurnalidan olgan rad javobim misolida, maqolam tadqiqot dizayniga mos bo'lgan boshqa jurnalni qanday topish mumkinligini ko'rsataman. 📅 Nima bo'ldi? Mening so'rovnoma (survey) dizaynidagi maqolam DTS dan ikkinchi marta qaytdi — sabab: jurnal endi bunday…
👍7❤5🔥2🥰1
📢 AVVAL MAQOLA, KEYIN DISSERTATSIYA BO'LIMI: TO'G'RI KETMA-KETLIK Yangi videoda — o'z DSc dissertatsiyamning III bobi (3.3-§) uchun rejalashtirilgan empirik tahlil misolida, nazariy asosdan tortib yangi Scopus maqolamning tayyor strukturasigacha bosqichma-bosqich yo'lni ko'rsataman. 📅 Video nimalarni qamrab oladi? 🔹 Nazariy asosdan tadqiqot modeligacha (research model) — qanday qilib nazariy asoslar (iqtisodiy sam…
❤10👍8🔥6
📢 Hurmatli hamkasblar! Sizlarni ilmiy jurnallar muharrirlari, nashriyotlar vakillari hamda ilmiy tashkilotlar mutaxassislari uchun tashkil etilayotgan maxsus vebinarlar seriyasida ishtirok etishga taklif qilamiz. 📅 31-iyul (Toshkent vaqti bilan) 🕙 10:00 — Web of Science Core Collection bazasiga jurnalni topshirish bo‘yicha tavsiyalar: jarayon bosqichlari va baholash mezonlari 🔗 https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/regi…
👍11👏4❤2🤩2
📝 Ilmiy maqolada zamonlardan qanday foydalanish kerak? Ko'pchilik ilmiy maqola yozishda eng ko'p adashadigan joylardan biri — bu zamonlarni noto'g'ri qo'llash. Abstractda qaysi zamon, Metodologiyada qaysi zamon, Xulosada esa qaysi zamon ishlatilishi kerakligini bilmaslik maqolangizni "xom" ko'rsatib qo'yishi mumkin. Quyidagi infografikada IMRaD tuzilishining har bir bo'limi — Abstract, Kirish, Adabiyotlar sharhi, …
👍12❤8🔥2
📢 DISSERTATSIYA VA SCOPUS MAQOLASI: BITTA ISHNI IKKI MARTA ISHLATING Yangi videoda — o'z DSc dissertatsiyam misolida, empirik bo'limni avval Scopus maqolasi sifatida tayyorlab, keyin dissertatsiyaning tegishli bo'limida qanday yoritganimni ko'rsataman. 📅 Nega bu mavzu hozir dolzarb? 2026-yil sentyabrdan DSc uchun Q1/Q2 jurnalda 2 ta maqola, 2027-yil 1-yanvardan PhD uchun Q1/Q2 jurnalda 1 ta maqola chop etish tavsi…
👍14❤6🔥3
PhD/DSc ILMIY ISH UCHUN NAZARIY ASOS NEGA KERAK? PhD/DSc ilmiy ishimiz uchun nazariy asos kerak bo'lib, biz nazariy asosni adabiyotlarni sharhi davomida aniqlaymiz. Ko'pchilik ilmiy ishini boshlaganda shu savolni beradi: 👉 Nazariy asos — bu shunchaki adabiyotlar sharhimi, yoki undan ham ko'proq narsami? Bugun buni oddiy va tushunarli qilib tushuntiramiz 👇 🔹 1. NAZARIYA — "JARAYON NIMA UCHUN SHUNDAY ISHLAYDI" DEGA…
❤5👍3🔥2
📊 Stata dasturida ishlash bo'yicha qo'llanma - boshlovchi tadqiqotchilar uchun! 📖 "Data Analysis with Stata: A Comprehensive Guide for Data Analysis and Interpretation of Outputs" — Sizning kitobingiz! (Muallif: Mohammad Tajul Islam, Russell Kabir, Monjura Nisha — ASA Publications) 🎯 Nega aynan bu kitob? Statistikadan chuqur bilimga ega bo'lmagan, lekin ma'lumotlar bilan ishlaydigan har qanday tadqiqotchi uchun yoz…
❤9👍5🔥2
📢 INDIVIDUAL ILMIY MAQOLA VA PhD DISSERTATSIYA YOZISH BO'YICHA QABUL OCHILDI! 🎓 Ikkita yo'nalish bo'yicha qabul e'lon qilinadi — ikkalasi ham to'liq individual formatda o'tkaziladi👇: 1️⃣ ILMIY MAQOLA YOZISH — INDIVIDUAL FORMAT (3 OYLIK) 🎥 Video darslar orqali mustaqil o'rganasiz, topshiriqlarni bajarasiz, keyin har hafta Zoom orqali men bilan sizning aniq tadqiqot mavzuyingiz bo'yicha alohida ishlaymiz. ✅ 2 ta y…
❤7👏7🎉4👍4
📌 ILMIY MAQOLA: Taqrizga tushish va taqriz jarayoni qanday ishlaydi? Ko'pchilik "nega maqolam hatto taqrizga yuborilmasdan qaytdi?" deb so'raydi. Keling, jarayonni ikki bosqichga bo'lib tushunib olaylik 👇: 1️⃣ Desk check — birinchi filtr Maqola taqrizchilarga yuborilishidan oldin, muharrir (Editor) uni o'zi ko'rib chiqadi. Bu bosqichda quyidagilarga e'tibor beriladi: 📍 Scope mosligi — mavzu jurnal qamroviga to'g'r…
❤3👏3🔥2
🎥 "Asian Development Review" jurnaliga maqola topshirish jarayoni videosi Shaxsiy maqolamni Asian Development Review (ADB/ADBI jurnali, Scopus Q2, nashr uchun to'lovsiz) jurnaliga qanday topshirganimni yozib oldim — bu tayyorlangan taqdimot emas, real vaqtda, o'zim boshdan kechirgan jarayon. Videoda quyidagilar ko'rsatilgan: ✅ Editorial Manager tizimida ro'yxatdan o'tish jarayoni; ✅ "Submit a Manuscript" bo'liminin…
❤7👍6🔥4🙏1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍15❤4🔥3🕊1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muyassarzoda_fayzieva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎓 Muyassarzoda_Fayziyeva” (@muyassarzoda_fayzieva), 2,221 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muyassarzoda_fayzieva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.