Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Архитектура решений | Мутракова Наталия

@mutrakovaIND

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

323subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002035516103
TypeChannel
Username@mutrakovaIND
DescriptionЯ — Наталия Мутракова, исполнительный директор IND. Веду стратегию и развитие топового арх бюро страны! В этом канале о жизни, бизнесе, ошибках и успехах на собственном опыте. Для связи - @mutrakova
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mutrakovaIND

Growth

3237 Aug 2026, 15:10 — 323 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 323 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:108 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 322–324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:30323no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:10323first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.6%
avg views ÷ 323 subscribers
Avg views / post
386
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026
Posts held10 (23 June 202630 July 2026)
Views total1,931
Reactions total49
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
63
Videos
6
Links
73

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
53s
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 9 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6641.3%
🔥1811.3%
👍138.13%
👎127.50%
😁127.50%
🥴116.88%
💩85.00%
🗿74.38%
❤‍🔥53.13%
🍌31.88%
🤡21.25%
💘10.625%
💯10.625%
🙊10.625%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mutrakovaIND. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC483 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Смеюсь от фразы: "На рабочке все поправим"))

😁12

30 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC460 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @indstudioVideo

Планировка, которая не продается — это ошибка, сделанная на этапе проекта или продаж? Исполнительный директор IND Наталия Мутракова обсудила с директором по маркетингу LEGENDA Всеволодом Глазуновым, как сегодня создавать планировки, которые находят своего покупателя.

6

28 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC356 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поняла, что люблю собирать людей вокруг интересных событий и просто так в теплом камерном кругу. С удовольствием провели прошлую среду в новом пространстве MR group в старом отреставрированном здании, где будет открыт новый шоурум проекта. фото от нашего пиар-директора Игоря✨

13👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTC356 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бывают дни, когда все идет не по плану. Вчера у меня был именно такой( Весь день были какие-то накладки, мискоммуникация, пропущенный поворот по пути на важную встречу, а еще весь день сбоил интернет и сервисы, что только подливало масла в огонь моего негодования😡. А вечером задумалась: что вообще означает такая злость руководителя? Делюсь с вами мыслями по этому поводу. Когда кажется, что все вокруг внезапно стали

8🔥2

16 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC276 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

La grazia (2025) Вот умеет же Соррентино снять красиво, чтобы получился слоеный пирог из смыслов и чтобы посмеяться было где. Просто потрясающе! В милосердии — красота сомнения.

4

13 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC243 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @zemlyaiporyadokPhoto

Рецепт от дергающегося глаза Вчера была на защитах проектов программы «Управление развитием туристических территорий», где вела модуль о пространственной части. Студенты замечательные, проект добротный. Но была пара моментов, от которых у меня дернулся глаз, потому что это системные пробелы, которые я наблюдаю ежедневно внутри своей команды тоже Итак, что упускают авторы проектов, когда увлекаются его разработкой (

10❤‍🔥2💘1💯1

13 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC226 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чему учим внутри бюро команду на примере отдела мастер-планирования от его лидера Ксении Шилковой👇🏻

7 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC≈5,660 views32 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера отмечали День архитектора в красивой березовой роще в ГЭС-2. Поздравляю лауреатов Архитектурной премии Москвы 👏 Было как всегда приятно увидеться с коллегами архитекторами. Жаль, что при награждении не выводили визуализацию самих проектов-победителей на экран, пришлось визуализировать их в своей голове) красиво делаю вид, что не застреваю каблуками в травке😁

13💩8🔥6🍌2🤡2❤‍🔥1

6 Jul 2026, 13:25 UTC≈6,360 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Спасибо Петру Моничу за репост предыдущего поста! Многие написали мне лично, что тема действительно смелая: о быстрой предконцепции в отрасли не принято говорить открыто. Мы не ожидали такого резонанса, но не боимся быть первыми, кто выносит сложные темы в публичное поле. Хочу добавить пару слов, потому что часть смысла в пересказе потерялась. Почему-то все стали обсуждать экстремальный срок и качество результата, х

12🔥6🥴3❤‍🔥1🙊1

23 Jun 2026, 15:05 UTC≈6,920 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Три недели назад сделали предконцепцию с визуализациями большого московского проекта за 3 дня. Без ИИ, конечно, не обошлось, работали в прямом смысле и днем, и ночью, по просьбе постоянного клиента. Справились хорошо. С тех пор получили 6 запросов на "быструю АГК за 5 дней" от разных компаний. Вот хороший урок, как работает рынок: как только он чувствует новую возможность, сразу же хочет ее монетизировать, это понят

👎12👍11🥴8🗿7🔥2❤‍🔥1🍌1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mutrakovaIND. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Архитектура решений | Мутракова Наталия” (@mutrakovaIND), 323 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutrakovaIND.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.