Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мутное поле экспериментов

@mutnoe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,645subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446088704
TypeChannel
Username@mutnoe
Created10 December 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mutnoe

Growth

1,6451,6481,646.56 August 2026 — 1,648 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,648 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,647 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,645 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,645–1,648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:041,645-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:081,647-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:191,648no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:001,648first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 1,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
617
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held17 (5 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total3,083
Reactions total113
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

521 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
19938.2%
💔13225.3%
🤣5710.9%
💯519.79%
🔥315.95%
🤝112.11%
😎81.54%
50.96%
🥰50.96%
👏40.768%
😁40.768%
😐40.768%
👍30.576%
😢20.384%
🤔20.384%
❤‍🔥10.192%
🏆10.192%
😴10.192%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 521reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC433 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тяжеловато. Не помогаете вы Русь подымать.

💔53

28 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC552 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ну штош, с Днем пярщика, дорогие мое. Праздник, как известно, со слезами на глазах. Но в этот раз буду менее радикален, чем пару годиков назад. Да, 5 лет СВО, тотальная деградация гуманитарных (и не только) специальностей, иишечка и, в целом, тиктокизация мозжечков, совсем пагубно сказались на и без того кривокосенькой отрасли и ее представителях, но. Как обычно все эти, эээ, «вызовы», сделали сильных еще сильнее, а

31💯9🥰5

22 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC719 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Кайфанул как не в себе.

🔥116

22 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC724 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Воспоминания запрещенной сети показывают, что и 10 лет назад я был мудр не по годам. Но и это - только начало.

💯11🤣5🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC655 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пошумели тут в Noodome любимом с Константином Аркадиевичем уважаемым и дорогим. Смотрите полную версию вечерком.

12🔥7👏4❤‍🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC848 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вынырнул из потрясающего совершенно адски жаркого Питера, узнал про существование Иды Галич (ну ладно) и что Крид собирает стадионы и вообще Канье Вест русский. Первое - еще ладно. Второе - нууу, кто-то же и Нойза музыкой считает. Страшное скажу - Крид, кажется, интереснее. Хотя в сортах говна разбираться - дело грустное.

💯137😁4😐4🔥1🤔1

8 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC≈1,030 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сейчас на полупоследнем издыхании домчал до СПб и в очередной раз задумался - а зачем вот это все? Разумных доводов не обрел, но всплыла в голове великая история. Которая многое объясняет. Марчелло Мастрояни, как известно, долгое время кокетливо отказывался сниматься в Dolce Vita. До тех пор, пока не увидит сценарий. Тогда Феллини отправил ему стопку листов: все, кроме одного из них, были пустыми. На этом листе был

🤣225🔥2🤔1

8 Jul 2026, 09:54 UTC834 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Просто хочу напомнить, что. И ты его, вижу, протратил впустую.

💔84💯2

22 Jun 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,230 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Умер Алан Гринспен. У нас, понятно, не до того, экспертной онолитеги на эту тему мало, да и момент, действительно, не тот. Но, если вы хотите немножко в чуть более долгую - прочитайте «Эпоху потрясений». Феерически иезуитская (хотя эти орденские пацаны в сравнении с финансовой элитой США 20 века - просто пацаны) книга, которую можно читать примерно как талмуд. Толстая. Так что идите дальше тиктоки смотреть, девочки.

11💯95

18 Jun 2026, 10:52 UTC≈5,590 views184 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Встретил в переулках Чистых главу одной, скажем абстрактно, крупной энергетической компании. В годах человек, бывалый. Идет себе в джинсах, курточке джинсовой. С дамой. За ручку. И дама в таких же легкомысленных турнюрах, но явно нелегкомысленных украшениях (со вкусом и в меру). Тоже в годах дама, красивая, улыбается. Свидание, короче. Точно свидание. У всех любовь. У одного у тебя нет.

💔10840🤣23🤝11😢2

16 Jun 2026, 19:19 UTC≈5,110 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ничего не изменилось. Но через 5 часов новый самолет. И это тоже не изменилось.

31😎4👍1💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @mutnoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 458,063 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мутное поле экспериментов” (@mutnoe), 1,645 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mutnoe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.