Channel
@mustarah
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,858subscribers
-354 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001193912417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mustarah |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mustarah |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 22:50 | 14,858 | +1 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 23:45 | 14,857 | -6 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 15:21 | 14,863 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:16 | 14,868 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 14,875 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:47 | 14,881 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:39 | 14,884 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:56 | 14,889 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 14,893 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 14,900 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:06 | 14,903 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:20 | 14,904 | -4 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 14,908 | -9 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 14,917 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 11:45 | 14,921 | +4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 14,917 | +3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 11:49 | 14,914 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:54 | 14,915 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:17 | 14,909 | -19 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 14,928 | first reading |
170 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (28 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,335 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 21:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
••° جَوْهَرُ الصَّبْرِ أَنْ تَحْتَمِلَ مَا لَا تَفْهَمُ: "وَكَيْفَ تَصْبِرُ عَلَى مَا لَمْ تُحِطْ بِهِ خُبْرًا" وَجَوْهَرُ التَّسْلِيمِ أَلَّا تَسْأَلَ لِمَادَا وَمَتَى وَكَيْفَ: "يَا أَبَتِ افْعَلْ مَا تُؤْمَرُ" وَجَوْهَرُ الرِّضَا أَلَّا تَدَعَ طَائِرَ الشَّكْوَى يَبُوحُ بِتَبَارِيحِهِ إِلَّا عَلَى أَغْصَانِ شَجَرَةِ طُوبَى؛ فَكُلَّمَا كَانَتِ الشَّكْوَى أَبْعَدَ عَنِ الْأَرْضِ، تَلَقَّتْهَا عَطَايَا الْكَرِيمِ…
••° « - دعُوا للنّاس فُسحة فِي عُزلتهم، ما دُمتم تعْلمون أنّ راحتهم بها، فَلربما يَبتعد المرْء عَن صحبتِه، وهُو فِي أشّد الاحْتياج لِيبقى بمُفردِه، رُبما لَم يَعد يَجد نَفسه مُطمئنًا إلا بَين حَوائط غُرفته، لا تَسألوا عن أسباب عُزلته، ولا تُفسدوا الودّ بِسوء الظّن بيْنكم، ولا تُخمنوا أشياءَ لم يبُح بِها مُباشرة لكمْ، فَقط ادعوا لهُ بالخَير غيبًا، والتَمسوا لهُ العُذر دومًا، حتى وإنّ طَال غِيابه، أشّعروه أنّه لَم يغ…
••° كلّ صاحبٍ لك سينشغل دونك، وكلّ مجلسٍ تألفه سيمضي عنك، وكلّ أسباب الأنس لابدّ لها من انقطاع، فاتّخذ القرآن أنيسًا وجليسًا وصاحبًا، فهو الأنيس الّذي لا يغيب، والجليس الّذي لا يخذل جليسه، والصّاحب المرافق لصاحبه في كلّ أحواله!.. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
Photo, posted without a caption
••° -وفاءُ المرء أدلُّ شيءٍ على كريم معدنه، وطيب أصله، وشرف نفسه، وأرفعُ درجات الوفاء الوفاءُ عند انقطاع أسباب الوصل التامّ. ذكر ابن حزم في طوق الحمامة ثلاث مراتب للوفاء، جعل أعلاها: «ثم مرتبة ثالثة، وهي الوفاء مع اليأس الباتّ، وبعد حلول المنايا وفجاءات المنون، وإنَّ الوفاء في هذه الحالة لأجلُّ وأحسنُ منه في الحياة ومع رجاء اللقاء». ومن جميل ما يُروى في الوفاء وحُسن العهد، قول أم المؤمنين عائشة رضي الله عنها: «ج…
Photo, posted without a caption
••° "وبعضُ عذاباتِ الدُنيا، عتباتُ الفردوسِ الأعلى!" - د. كفاح أبو هنّود. ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
••° قَالَ الإِمَامُ ابْنُ القَيِّمِ رَحِمَهُ الله: «وَقَدْ قَضَى الله تَعَالَى قَضَاءً لَا يُرَدُّ وَلَا يُدْفَعُ، أَنَّ مَنْ أَحَبَّ شَيْئًا سِوَاهُ عُذِّبَ بِهِ وَلَا بُدَّ، وَأَنَّ مَنْ خَافَ غَيْرَهُ سُلِّطَ عَلَيْهِ، وَأَنَّ مَنِ اشْتَغَلَ بِشَيْءٍ غَيْرِهِ كَانَ شُؤْمًا عَلَيْهِ، وَمَنْ آثَرَ غَيْرَهُ عَلَيْهِ لَمْ يُبَارَكْ فِيهِ، وَمَنْ أَرْضَى غَيْرَهُ بِسَخَطِهِ أَسْخَطَهُ عَلَيْهِ وَلَا بُدَّ». الوَابِ…
Photo, posted without a caption
••° ﴿فَابْعَثُوا أَحَدَكُمْ بِوَرِقِكُمْ هَذِهِ إِلَى الْمَدِينَةِ﴾ هذه الآية تدل على صحة الوكالة، وهي أقوى آية في إثباتها. 📗 أحكام القرآن/ 5/296 ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
💭 التربية فن وعلم ومهارة هنااا جمعنا لكم أهم النصائح والإرشادات التربوية✅👇 https://t.me/addlist/CxOFMyWJTPA1OGE8 🛒كل ما يهم ربات البيوت 🍔طبخات 💌ونصائح وتوجيهات تربوية وأسرية وزوجية🌹👇 https://t.me/addlist/CxOFMyWJTPA1OGE8 📝هُنَا حَيّثُ الغُرَبَــــاء وعشــــاق الكلمـــات الهادئــة وإلاقتباسـات المتنـوعة...🕊👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/addlist/CxOFMyWJTPA1OGE8 📝 حكم الجري لإدراك الصلاة ؟ 🎤 سماحة الشيخ : ابن باز رحمه الله. ht…
📌ثـلاثـة لا يـهـديـهـم الله احذر أن تكون منهم 👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/addlist/2ynOyaSKj-xiMDY0 📖 آياتٌ نتدبّرها ونتأمّل معانيها https://t.me/wrattel2/790👈 https://t.me/wrattel2/790👈 📮نصيحــــــــة لمن ابتلي 👈🏻 بمشاهدة الحرام👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/addlist/2ynOyaSKj-xiMDY0
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @mustarah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mustarah edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 8 posts on @mustarah as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Named by 53 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mustarah named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مُستَــراحُ القُلـــوبِ ••🌸” (@mustarah), 14,858 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mustarah.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.