Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TikTok&Reels Instagram&Shorts Musor

Channel

TikTok&Reels Instagram&Shorts Musor

@musor_tiktok

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

69,867subscribers

+69,328 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004455921484
TypeChannel
Username@musor_tiktok
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/musor_tiktok

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

74,000 average views per post against 69,867 subscribers — an engagement rate of 105.9%. Across the 8,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.09% and 21.2%, with a median of 10.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured43 of 44 published in the window (0 exact, 43 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,181,900
Mature posts only109.9% over 41 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers69,867 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,385 channels · p10 2.53% · p25 5.09% · p50 10.6% · p75 21.2% · p90 36.0%
Position in cohort99.809th percentile · 10.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.031% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

53970,53035,534.56 August 2026 — 539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 539 subscribers6 August 2026 — 583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 873 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,842 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,936 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,115 subscribers26 August 2026 — 35,999 subscribers27 August 2026 — 41,022 subscribers28 August 2026 — 45,212 subscribers29 August 2026 — 49,978 subscribers30 August 2026 — 55,130 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,819 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,017 subscribers2 September 2026 — 64,857 subscribers4 September 2026 — 67,111 subscribers6 September 2026 — 69,786 subscribers10 September 2026 — 70,472 subscribers12 September 2026 — 70,357 subscribers14 September 2026 — 70,360 subscribers15 September 2026 — 70,530 subscribers17 September 2026 — 69,867 subscribers69,8676 August 202617 September 2026
22 measurements spanning 43 days, net +69,328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:1969,867-663
15 Sept 2026, 20:0070,530+170
14 Sept 2026, 00:1970,360+3
12 Sept 2026, 09:3770,357-115
10 Sept 2026, 06:1670,472+686
6 Sept 2026, 20:4169,786+2,675
4 Sept 2026, 11:2067,111+2,254
2 Sept 2026, 20:4364,857+1,840
1 Sept 2026, 18:2263,017+3,198
31 Aug 2026, 17:1759,819+4,689
30 Aug 2026, 18:4755,130+5,152
29 Aug 2026, 21:3549,978+4,766
28 Aug 2026, 20:4245,212+4,190
27 Aug 2026, 23:2841,022+5,023
26 Aug 2026, 23:4735,999+5,884
25 Aug 2026, 21:3430,115+21,179
22 Aug 2026, 13:278,936+6,094
19 Aug 2026, 05:542,842+1,969
12 Aug 2026, 23:26873+290
6 Aug 2026, 22:55583first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
104.7%
avg views ÷ 69,867 subscribers
Avg views / post
73,200
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.593%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
45
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held71 (27 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total3,219,940
Reactions total11,811
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 14:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Videos
1
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

11,811 reactions across 33 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔3,84632.6%
2,54121.5%
🗿1,92116.3%
🤯1,52512.9%
🙈5744.86%
🍌2181.85%
🤔2031.72%
🙏1721.46%
🤨1421.20%
👍890.754%
🔥740.627%
570.483%
❤‍🔥520.44%
🎉490.415%
💯490.415%
🥰410.347%
😐380.322%
🌭310.262%
🐳280.237%
🎃220.186%
12 further kinds1391.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC≈6,340 views115 reactionsread 22 September 2026

🖥 МЫ СМЕНИЛИ ОСНОВНОЙ ДОМЕН Теперь официальный сайт — musordrop.app Старый домен musor.best никуда не делся — он автоматически перенаправляет вас на musordrop.app. ⚠️ ВАЖНО: у нас существует только 3 оригинальных домена: • musordrop.app — новый основной • musor.best — старый домен с редиректом • musor.click ❌ ВСЕ ОСТАЛЬНЫЕ ДОМЕНЫ — НЕ НАШИ. Если вы встретили сайт с другим адресом, не вводите там данные и не авто

🗿65💔22🤯1210🍌2🙈2👍1🤔1

21 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC≈22,200 views502 reactionsread 22 September 2026

С этого дня мы начинаем публиковать файлы с отчётами о выплатах — сколько заявок было финализировано и на какую общую сумму. Хотим сделать процесс максимально прозрачным для всех. ❗️Важно: старые выплаченные заявки в списки включаться не будут, поскольку собрать их все довольно трудозатратно. В файлах будут отображаться только новые выплаченные заявки. 📎 Прикрепляем первый список выплаченных заявок. ✅ И это ещё н

187🤯158🗿63💔43🤔19🙈18🔥5🍓3

21 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC≈21,200 views113 reactionsread 22 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

💯41🗿33💔176🤔6🤯5❤‍🔥2🔥2

21 Sept 2026, 02:08 UTC≈21,900 views157 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🖤 НОВАЯ КОЛЛЕКЦИЯ КЕЙСОВ — MUSOR DROP Мы собрали бренды, которые задают стиль, люкс и уличную моду. От доступного Vetements до эксклюзивной Balenciaga. ⚰️ 7 БРЕНДОВ, 7 КЕЙСОВ. — VETEMENTS — 400₽ — MAISON MARGIELA — 2 000₽ — RICK OWENS — 5 000₽ — LOUIS VUITTON — 8 500₽ — NAPAPIJRI ANORAKI — 10 000₽ — КОЛЛАБОРАЦИИ — 17 500₽ — BALENCIAGA — 40 000₽ От культовых дизайнеров до редких коллабораций — выбирай свой бренд и

73🗿45💔17🥰6❤‍🔥4🍌4🐳2🤔2

20 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC≈27,600 views461 reactionsread 22 September 2026

ИНФОРМАЦИЯ ПО ВЫПЛАТАМ В этот понедельник не все креаторы получили свои выплаты. Приносим искренние извинения за предоставленные неудобства. В понедельник нам удалось обработать только 60% выплат креаторам. Оставшиеся выплаты будут полностью закрыты завтра — все креаторы получат свои деньги. Спасибо за понимание и терпение. ❤

260💔81🗿52🤔18🙈16🎉1311🐳4

19 Sept 2026, 22:00 UTC≈27,400 views439 reactionsread 22 September 2026

🔥 МУСОРНЫЙ БУМ ЦЕЛЫЙ ЧАС — 100% РЕЙКБЕЙК! На протяжении целого часа RTP во всех играх — 100%. Никаких потерь на дистанции! Если вам понравится данная акция — будем проводить её гораздо чаще. Мусорный бум начинается musor.best

199💔121🗿70🙈21🍌13👍74🆒3

16 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC≈66,200 views2,891 reactionsread 22 September 2026

📢 Обновили оплату за контент Мы снизили оплату за cs2 контент. 🎮 CS2-контент • 1 000 просмотров — $0.7 • 100 000 просмотров — $70 • 1 000 000 просмотров — $700 👨‍🎨 Не CS2-контент • 1 000 просмотров — $0.25 • 100 000 просмотров — $25 • 1 000 000 просмотров — $250 👩‍🎨 Креативы (даже если вставлен баннер) • 1 000 просмотров — $0.1 • 100 000 просмотров — $10 • 1 000 000 просмотров — $100

💔1,370🗿1,110🙈197🤯95🍌47🥰18🤔17🔥13

12 Sept 2026, 21:26 UTC≈73,500 views896 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Мы потихоньку выходим на стабильный режим работы и уже вернулись к регламентному сроку ответа. Повышение минимального порога до 30 000 просмотров значительно облегчило нам работу, Кроме того, сейчас ваши видео проверяют более 10 модераторов, поэтому обработка заявок постепенно ускоряется. 🗓 В понедельник проведём массовую выплату за TikTok и закроем все накопившиеся выплаты. Также с сегодняшнего дня вводим новое п

529💔180🍌48🗿34🙈33👍21🤝13🌭12

10 Sept 2026, 20:16 UTC≈58,800 views512 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @musor_drop

Более 9 лет одни и те же пузатые старики трясут с вас деньги, считая, что игрокам не нужен честный рандом. Они сами придумали правила, сами называют это «RTP», а по факту — годами зарабатывают на доверии обычных игроков. Эти люди давно стали долларовым мультимиллионерами, и молодое поколение не должно продолжать их кормить. Мы не будем делать вид, что стоим выше этой индустрии. Но для нас есть принципиальная разн

233🙈152🗿53🍌19🔥16👍11💘7🎃6

9 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC≈69,000 views376 reactionsread 22 September 2026

аккаунт ксюши восстановлен, нет необходимости писать на @safetytiktok контакт: @vip_musor

🙏168🤯6155🗿27💔22🐳11👍109

8 Sept 2026, 22:48 UTC≈70,600 views357 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Новый аккаунт для проверки создан — @safetytiktok Теперь отправляйте туда только новые TikTok, которые ещё не отправляли на проверку. Все старые TikTok, которые вы отправляли Ксюше, у нас сохранились, повторно отправлять их не нужно. Пожалуйста, внимательно: на @safetytiktok отправляем строго новые TikTok.

167🗿78🤔29💔28❤‍🔥16👍10🦄8🍌7

8 Sept 2026, 22:08 UTC≈69,300 views262 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Аккаунт, через который мы проверяем TikTok, заморозили. Утром создадим новый аккаунт и продолжим работу уже через него. Все данные по вашим TikTok у нас сохранились, поэтому переживать не нужно — ничего не потерялось, выводы тоже сохранены, Параллельно занимаемся восстановлением старого аккаунта. Скорее всего, его получится восстановить, но пока не хотим обещать это на 100%.

🤯13470💔16🤩15👌7🔥5🤔5🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @musor_tiktok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@musor_tiktok edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
1 September 2026
Most recent edit
8 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TikTok&Reels Instagram&Shorts Musor” (@musor_tiktok), 69,867 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/musor_tiktok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.