Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мурмолка

@murmolka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,253subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001195365330
TypeChannel
Username@murmolka
Descriptionканал фоторедактора и независимой исследовательницы насти индриковой
Created13 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/murmolka

Growth

1,2536 Aug 2026, 05:33 — 1,253 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 08:33 — 1,253 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 05:336 Aug 2026, 08:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,252–1,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 08:331,253no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:331,253first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 29 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.9%
avg views ÷ 1,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
350
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held10 (29 March 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,750
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC≈216 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Приходите, если будете недалеко. 20 августа, четверг, 18:00 Культурный центр Волна г. Выкса, ул. 1 Мая, 36

4 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC≈261 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ближайшие месяцы вместе с Ильясом Хаджи работаю в резиденции «Выкса». Есть несколько стульев, на которые не хочется сесть с проектом, хотя они заманчивые и знакомые. Пробовать что-то новое сейчас нелегко, а качественного рабочего времени в связи с некоторыми обстоятельствами личной жизни (которые требуют чтобы им повторяли, что собачка делает паф-паф, кошечка мяу-мяу, а мыло и крем есть нельзя) довольно мало. Но рези

1 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈346 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сходила сегодня на две выставки, о которых хочу рассказать чуть позже, но есть один экспонат, о котором я просто не могу молчать. [upd] Шалтай-Болтая Прялка из Вологодской губернии, ХIX век Собрание Сергея Кокурова Кто это? Ваши версии. Правильный ответ (с музейной этикетки) вечером (или раньше, потому что это слишком смешно).

30 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC≈445 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Откровенно говоря, я отношусь немного скептически к этому распространению архивов в искусстве. Некоторые художники архивируют все подряд — от списка бакалейных товаров до обрезанных ногтей, и, если честно, мне это кажется очень нарциссическим родом деятельности. Во многих коллекциях подобного рода не так уж много смысла. Другими словами, большую часть времени это всего лишь некая формальная деятельность. Вы можете на

29 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC≈482 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вау! Издательство «Азбука» перевели и издали «Музеи жестокости: Бенинские бронзы, колониальное насилие и культурная реституция» (The Brutish Museums: The Benin Bronzes, Colonial Violence and Cultural Restitution) Дэна Хикса. В этой связи хотела бы напомнить о рецензии Дениса Столярова на эту книгу, которую он писал для нас в EastEast. Очень любопытно взглянуть на них (и книгу, и рецензию, и перевод) сейчас, спустя

29 May 2026, 07:18 UTC≈546 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мне кажется, этот скан из It All Began With ‘Read’. Unfolding The Arabs’ History. Highlights From The Heritage Library Collection (2018) достоин большего паблисити, чем у него есть сейчас. Ссылка на другие страницы из книги. Гравюра из ‘Recueil de Divers Portraits des Dames Principales de la Porte du Grand Turc’ (1648). Georges de La Chapelle

19 May 2026, 10:31 UTC≈594 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Села читать последнюю книгу Маргареты фон Освальд "Working Through Colonial Collections. An Ethnography of the Ethnological Museum in Berlin" (2022). Пока не продвинулась дальше визуального вступления. Не знаю, что все же содержится в текстовой части, но фотографии фондов и подсобных помещений Этнологического музея любопытные. Очень понравилась вот этот комментарий о съемке: The photographs of the East Africa museu

18 May 2026, 18:48 UTC≈539 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В честь нашего общего праздника сегодня надеялась насмотреться красоты и принести вам что-нибудь прекрасное из списка победителей Museums+Heritage Awards 2026. Но не увидела интересного... (насколько можно судить дистанционно, конечно же) Выставочных категорий три: 🟢постоянная экспозиция музея, 🟢временная экспозиция с бюджетом менее 80 тысяч фунтов (в месте такого разделения каждый раз грустно) 🟢временная экспозиция

29 Mar 2026, 19:40 UTC≈857 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Minarets Of Islamic Cairo. Sabah Elhadid | Rizo Masr, ссылка Очень понравились и другие издания этого проекта (вся печать на ризографе). Например, про рынки Каира, номер MacGuffin про египетские архивы. Есть старые карты. В общем, много любопытного.

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @murmolka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 416,251 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мурмолка” (@murmolka), 1,253 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murmolka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.