Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

мурчелики

@murcheliki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,129subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130604162
TypeChannel
Username@murcheliki
Descriptionкотячьи преколыши, но иногда депрессиши ♡ пинтерест https://pin.it/3SaMEkpid ♡ реклама @murchelikiprice ♡ чатик @murchelikichat
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/murcheliki

Growth

19,12919,17519,1527 August 2026 — 19,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,175 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,170 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,160 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,155 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,157 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,155 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,137 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,129 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,122–19,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:0619,129-8
13 Aug 2026, 09:2819,137-18
12 Aug 2026, 06:5319,155-2
11 Aug 2026, 04:4319,157+2
10 Aug 2026, 03:1119,155-5
9 Aug 2026, 00:5219,160-10
7 Aug 2026, 22:3419,170-5
7 Aug 2026, 14:0019,175no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:5619,175first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.7%
avg views ÷ 19,129 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,160
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held30 (2 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total124,799
Reactions total7,039
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,470
Videos
9

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

7,039 reactions across 30 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,57722.4%
❤‍🔥4846.88%
💘4746.73%
custom 53305667438048920803054.33%
custom 53278073948209425842143.04%
custom 53279322924699077011992.83%
custom 53278932297423514021912.71%
custom 52783896943867060911812.57%
custom 52087661399197699801672.37%
custom 54250432081344665081642.33%
custom 53278758394197717261582.24%
custom 52359029330018461431452.06%
custom 53798866220640018701452.06%
custom 53506870034342944521442.05%
custom 53256283431633163521371.95%
custom 53823510700034752491371.95%
custom 52358317009692423261331.89%
custom 52607508134578311961331.89%
custom 53259751445925995551321.88%
custom 54544094414304786541321.88%
31 further kinds1,68724.0%

Custom emoji. 17 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,039reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 30 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @murcheliki. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC659 views78 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥3220custom 539327372159303039519custom 53908541474718629767

14 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,110 views181 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 528760669849887238788custom 52897082947162808464834❤‍🔥9💘2

14 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,600 views217 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5325879839268299226121custom 53258561138689566195035💘8❤‍🔥3

13 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈2,890 views219 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘92custom 53823583757428468616937custom 538186864209691971015❤‍🔥6

13 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈3,150 views230 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5325975144592599555132custom 53278073948209425845635❤‍🔥4💘3

13 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC≈3,160 views236 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

119custom 523578452934343133552custom 527838969438670609144💘14❤‍🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈3,260 views244 reactions3 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 532780739482094258415852custom 532782601350416860126❤‍🔥6💘2

12 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,420 views256 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5235831700969242326133custom 54564291498014230927639❤‍🔥6💘2

10 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC≈4,000 views261 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5330566743804892080127custom 53278932297423514028327❤‍🔥17💘7

10 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈4,440 views274 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘116custom 52850496983091495097945custom 528545672806482570128❤‍🔥6

9 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈4,630 views256 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5454409441430478654132custom 546555120077662639670💘2822❤‍🔥4

8 Aug 2026, 19:10 UTC≈4,620 views245 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

112custom 532789322974235140281💘29custom 533056674380489208019❤‍🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @murcheliki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 480,978 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“мурчелики” (@murcheliki), 19,129 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murcheliki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.