Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Просто OZON

Channel

Просто OZON

@murasova_ozon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

7,629subscribers

-148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001962985672
TypeChannel
Username@murasova_ozon
DescriptionДобро пожаловать на канал с классными находами с OZON и Яндекс Маркет🔥 Реклама @myrasova
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/murasova_ozon

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6297,7777,7037 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,774 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,775 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,763 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,760 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,757 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,750 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,749 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,740 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,739 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,736 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,730 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,725 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,707 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,695 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,675 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,666 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,660 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,654 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,658 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,655 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,651 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,647 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,645 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,637 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,629 subscribers7 August 202610 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -148. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,607–7,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:087,629-8
6 Nov 2026, 10:577,637-8
3 Nov 2026, 14:547,645-2
1 Nov 2026, 00:217,647-4
28 Oct 2026, 17:477,651-4
25 Oct 2026, 20:367,655-3
22 Oct 2026, 22:267,658+4
20 Oct 2026, 05:167,654-6
17 Oct 2026, 07:557,660-6
14 Oct 2026, 07:097,666-9
10 Oct 2026, 15:577,675-20
4 Oct 2026, 18:187,695-12
25 Sept 2026, 04:387,707-18
16 Sept 2026, 20:177,725-5
13 Sept 2026, 00:597,730-6
9 Sept 2026, 03:197,736-3
3 Sept 2026, 20:207,739-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:127,740-9
28 Aug 2026, 09:527,749-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:157,750first reading

Engagement

335 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 7,629 subscribers
Avg views / post
852
138 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.276%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
138
of 335 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 135 of 138 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held335 (6 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total117,603
Reactions total318
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,230
Videos
≈8
Links
≈6,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

831 reactions across 322 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 97.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤81397.8%
👍80.963%
🔥80.963%
👏10.12%
🤩10.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 325 of the 335 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 831 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 335 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
7.46%
25 of 335 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
25
posts carrying an erid · 24 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
873
over 25 measured posts
Median views · rest
899
over 310 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjdFzXRW23 November 20265 November 2026
2RanymaJ58g16 November 20266 November 2026
2Ranyn4HRFi12 November 20262 November 2026
2RanynGhEFv13 November 20263 November 2026
2RanynXcEQ3128 August 202628 August 2026
2SDnjbrVDWT16 August 20266 August 2026
2SDnjbuTYAQ17 November 20267 November 2026
2SDnjbzMPEK125 August 202625 August 2026
2SDnjc91qz316 August 20266 August 2026
2SDnjcRT8H1124 August 202624 August 2026
2SDnjcmzWwv19 November 20269 November 2026
2SDnjcu4y7z17 November 20267 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 12 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.

Measured over the 335 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 138 posts held from the last 30 days (7.97%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC467 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/9o3NbHC Оценка 4.8

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC506 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

+ 300 бонусов продавца https://ozon.ru/s/wilderberg

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 16:37 UTC637 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/s/home-depo-n Оценка 4.9

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 15:44 UTC646 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/r9klDUB Оценка 4.9

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC678 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/BSvFQaX Оценка 4.8

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC752 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/pHZVwJc Оценка 4.9

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC795 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/l1rLAV7 Оценка 4.9

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC782 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/5DppGFk Оценка 4.7

❤3

10 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC785 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/t/v0W30Bt Оценка 4.9

❤2

10 Nov 2026, 10:25 UTC769 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

https://ozon.ru/p/o7123986 Оценка 5.0

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 335 posts we hold for @murasova_ozon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@murasova_ozon edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Просто OZON” (@murasova_ozon), 7,629 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murasova_ozon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.