Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

United Muppetiers

@muppetiers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001742263028
TypeChannel
Username@muppetiers
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/muppetiers

Growth

377 August 2026 — 37 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–38 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:4537no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:3337first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
388
Videos
12
Links
1,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
233.3%
👍233.3%
👎116.7%
🤣116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2023 to 14 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC980 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

We don’t have loads of options for changes. But Sancho has to start, that much I know.

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC987 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Tim Howard right there, that incident has occurred a thousand times and never been called so not gonna start now.

🤣1

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC981 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026

FT. That was a tight one. Found a way to win in a poor performance. Erik a bit to think about after this. Wan-Bissaka and Onana my shared MOTMs today. Varane with our game winner.

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC744 viewsread 10 August 2026

Awb earning his inclusion tonight there is no doubt. https://t.co/mybQGERiOg

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC822 viewsread 10 August 2026

There’s a strategy Wolves are employing that is working, and it’s pretty much working based on being unconcerned by the wingers.

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC906 viewsread 10 August 2026

Both Lisandro and Shaw had yellows on the left and we don’t have 2 fullbacks on the bench so, looks like Ten Hag being careful.

14 Aug 2023, 22:11 UTC673 viewsread 10 August 2026

Patiently waiting for wingers to play the runners in when we set up to have runners.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muppetiers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“United Muppetiers” (@muppetiers), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muppetiers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.