Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mundra's hideout

Channel

mundra's hideout

@mundra_hideout

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

1,616subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002757753786
TypeChannel
Username@mundra_hideout
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mundra_hideout

Growth

1,6151,6201,617.58 August 2026 — 1,620 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,620 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,615 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,616 subscribers1,6168 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,614–1,621 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 17:571,616-1
14 Aug 2026, 16:481,617+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:121,615-5
8 Aug 2026, 10:331,620no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:331,620first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.0%
avg views ÷ 1,616 subscribers
Avg views / post
502
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (10 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,009
Reactions total178
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

454 reactions across 10 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26959.3%
🔥9821.6%
🤔327.05%
💯132.86%
🥰112.42%
🙏102.20%
🌭61.32%
🐳30.661%
😱30.661%
😁20.441%
😨20.441%
🤨20.441%
🆒10.22%
👍10.22%
🦄10.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 454reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC345 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Когда-нибудь я начну заканчивать старые картинки. Сейчас есть оправдание - пока переезжала, провафлила стилус от планшета, пока искала замену - чиркала на айпаде. К айпаду я оказалась при этом всем не готова - отсутствие нужных степеней нажима меня убивает, но, говорят, к этому привыкаешь инфа сотка, врут. Из этого, к слову, произошло любопытное - так как я сидела и чиркала на нем, как палкой по песку, понизились тр

55🔥7🌭1🐳1

1 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC658 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Заодно положу сюда помянутого из комментов Racter'a и первые попытки в ИИ-роман из 1980х, которая, с одной стороны, представляет собой очаровательный нонсенс, а с другой, если сильно напрячь свой СПГС - занятные измышления за жизнь (что, впрочем, заставляет меня думать, что какая-то часть хуманской обработки тут все-таки была). https://f17webadvanced.teachinginter.net/contents/pdfs/RACTER_Policemans-Beard.pdf Ну и

9

1 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC598 views71 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На фоне срача про Монеточку и ее новый ИИ-клип мне интересен такой феномен, как легкое говное - ээээ, необразованность творческих людей в других сферах искусства. Как вообще так получается, что ты окружен артом со всех сторон, но при этом садишься на ментальный шпагат, как только речь заходит про что-то вне твоей области? Почему музыканты спокойно относятся к ИИ-арту, а художники к ИИ-музыке, почему вообще кругозор

🤔3223💯13🤨2🐳1

30 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTC543 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/drone_wars_/status/2082234120235590099?s=46 https://www.satyress.com Пока я собираю технику на новом месте (сход-развал ПК прошел успешно), покажу вам штуку, которая приводит меня в восторг сразу по ряду причин: 1. Это робот-кентавр. 2. Он ЕЩЕ ОПАСНЕЕ, чем выглядит (стянула с офф. сайта) 3. Вся его промо-компания - чистый хоррор-вайб, помноженный на технарское задротство (насадки на руки! управление

🥰108😱3😁2😨2🔥1🦄1

30 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC535 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Проходила у Элины курс, так что смело рекомендую воркшоп (хоть и с опозданием), она отличный преподаватель 👁️👄👁️

2

30 Jul 2026, 16:16 UTC330 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @afterallpartyPhoto

а ой🤪 Причина тряски: АНОНС 🎊ВОРКШОПА ПО ЖИВОПИСНОСТИ!🎊 Как говорится, мы делали, делали и наконец доделали, вы ждали и дождались - вот он, красавчик, ура 🔝 волнуюс и надеюсь что всё пройдёт хорошо, мы с командой очень старались! Чего ждать: 💚Будем говорить ТОЛЬКО про цвет и его развитие, брашворк, мазочки и как обуздать этих трёх белых коней в дидже 😊 💚Практика и домашка обязательны 💚Когда: 10 августа - 6 сентя

5

6 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC926 views82 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Переезжаю я в Белград потихоньку. Пока не знаю, как оно мне будет, в иммиграции - дама я домашняя и, несмотря на все разъезды, к 30 годам ухитрилась ни разу даже квартиру не снимать, так что пока слегка потеряна, растеряна и преисполнена возвышенных ожиданий от мироздания - этим и держусь. Ну и друзьями, друзья у меня замечательные. Скорее всего, общая эйфория пройдет и меня разъебет классической иммигрантской тоск

🔥4822🙏10🥰1🆒1

18 Jun 2026, 19:55 UTC≈1,120 views94 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хожу к Шуре на арт-ретрит и изменять с другим котом 🌚 Ну и продолжаю осваивать традишку как могу, в этот раз - масляная пастель

70🔥21🌭3

17 Jun 2026, 14:34 UTC923 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаю некромантско-таксидермический лор! Сегодня принесла вам химеру. Короче, конкретно эта химера - это не просто так. Это чудо, сотворенное местной святой, это символ веры, герб, и в конце концов - остов, запертый в дворцовых казематах (все чудеса имеют свойство заканчиваться). Легенды гласят, что дворцовая химера и по сей день хранит замок и его обитателей от любых нападающих; на самом же деле это тот самый "

46🔥14🌭2🐳1👍1

10 Jun 2026, 13:20 UTC668 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @balashovannartPhoto

У меня сегодня день рождения. Делюсь артами в честь события! Год был тяжелым что-то.

29🔥7

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @mundra_hideout. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,415,694 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mundra's hideout” (@mundra_hideout), 1,616 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mundra_hideout.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.