沐沐丝艺订阅版 pinned a photo

Channel
沐沐丝艺订阅版
@mumusizu888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,442subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002546908022 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mumusizu888 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mumusizu888 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 1,442 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 1,439 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.1%
- avg views ÷ 1,442 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 233
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.885%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (18 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,397 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟🤟 💋长乐公园地铁口〔沐沐丝足〕💋 🫶丝足 🫶半裸🫶 ❤️🔥抓龙筋 ❤️🔥 调教❤️🔥 💗 老师多多 💗嫩妹多多 💗高颜值 🫦预约排位🫦 🥳🥳🥳 🥳🥳🥳🥳 ✈️客服:@mumusizu8 😯😯😯 沐沐群组 💔💔💔老师资料 ❤️❤️❤️客户反馈 🎯🎯🎯导航信息
今日在岗
❤1
今日在岗可预约 新人苹果已到岗
今日在岗
沐沐丝艺订阅版 pinned a photo
沐沐丝艺订阅版 pinned Deleted message
沐沐丝艺订阅版 pinned Deleted message
今日在岗 新人晚点到岗
Photo, posted without a caption
【技师照片】:自愿拍摄不强求 【店名服务】:联系方式 【妹子花名】:依依 【尊姓大名】:ss 【验证时间】:七月中 【所在位置】 长乐公园 【身高身材】: 一米六,纤细 【颜值皮肤】:白 【瑕疵缺点】: 技术稍差些 【优点推荐点】:年轻漂亮,可以聊天,也可以默默服务 【服务流程】: 一进门就看到老师,很漂亮年轻,还有我喜欢的黑丝搭配,洗完澡后,很温柔耐心的给我服务,技术稍显不足但是年轻柔嫩的皮肤又弥补了这一切,到了正戏环节,我心里阈值比较高,妹妹很耐心的帮我,根据我的敏感点上下其手,不一会我就投降了,然后就是让妹妹给我继续按摩下,聊聊天,贤者时间疑似有点太长,所以按完就美美撤退了 【一句话点评】: 年轻就是正义 【推荐人群】:喜欢年轻的 【是否独家车评】:是 #嫩妹 丝足心灵树洞:@wyysmile 西安欲望都市:@XianYuWangDuShi
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @mumusizu888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,201,598 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“沐沐丝艺订阅版” (@mumusizu888), 1,442 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mumusizu888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.