National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
4,960 average views per post against 4,294 subscribers — an engagement rate of 115.4%. Across the 1,036 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,165–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Spanish — the middle half sit between 6.67% and 21.9%, with a median of 12.2%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (13 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Posts measured
20 of 20 published in the window (2 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
99,136
Mature posts only
128.7% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,288–4,295 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 15:47
4,294
+5
11 Aug 2026, 04:46
4,289
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
115.4%
avg views ÷ 4,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,960
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.054%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
20 (31 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
99,136
Reactions total
44
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 45s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
44 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
27
61.4%
🕊
6
13.6%
👌
3
6.82%
😢
2
4.55%
🤬
2
4.55%
🤯
2
4.55%
😇
1
2.27%
🥰
1
2.27%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇨🇴 Momentos de pánico en el Cable Aéreo de Manizales durante el terremoto de 7,4
Videos difundidos en redes muestran a pasajeros del Cable Aéreo de Manizales viviendo momentos de angustia durante el fuerte terremoto que sacudió Colombia este lunes.
En las imágenes se observa el movimiento de la cabina mientras los pasajeros reaccionan con temor. También se escuchan llamados a la calma realizados por trabajadores de…
🇨🇴🚨 TERREMOTO DE MAGNITUD 7,4 DEJA 28 MUERTOS EN COLOMBIA
Un sismo cuya magnitud fue actualizada de 6,4 a 7,4 tuvo su epicentro en San José del Palmar, departamento del Chocó, a 96 kilómetros de profundidad. El movimiento se sintió en Manizales, Bogotá, Medellín, Cali y otras ciudades de Colombia, además de Venezuela, Ecuador y Panamá.
En Cali, departamento del Valle del Cauca, los bomberos acudieron al sur de la c…
🇮🇳 India: peatón de 65 años muere atropellado por una grúa en Karaikal
Un hombre de 65 años murió tras ser embestido por detrás por una grúa en la ciudad de Karaikal, territorio de Puducherry, según el reporte difundido.
El peatón falleció en el lugar a causa del impacto.
☠️ MUERTE OSCURA ☠️
LINK PARA COMPARTIR NOTICIA Y ENTRAR A VERLA ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.me/muerteoscuraa ☠️
🇺🇸🔫 Nuevas imágenes muestran el tiroteo mortal en un In-N-Out de Idaho
La policía difundió nuevas imágenes de la masacre ocurrida la semana pasada en Twin Falls, Idaho, donde el atacante Chad Williams, de 24 años, abrió fuego cerca de un restaurante In-N-Out.
Las grabaciones muestran al tirador, a personas buscando refugio y los intentos de varios civiles y agentes por detenerlo. Tres personas murieron y otras 10 r…
🇲🇽⚡️ DOCE INFLUENCERS HAN SIDO ASESINADOS EN LA GUERRA INTERNA DEL CÁRTEL DE SINALOA
Al menos 12 influencers y creadores de contenido fueron asesinados desde septiembre de 2024 en distintos hechos registrados en el estado de Sinaloa, México, en medio de la disputa entre las facciones conocidas como Los Mayitos y Los Chapitos.
Según un recuento publicado por Grupo Reforma, los homicidios ocurrieron después de la cap…
🇺🇸 POLICÍA ABATE A UN HOMBRE QUE DISPARÓ CONTRA DOS PERSONAS FRENTE A BARES EN ALBUQUERQUE
Un hombre identificado como Stephen Griego, de 41 años, abrió fuego contra dos personas durante un altercado frente a varios bares del centro de Albuquerque, estado de Nuevo México, Estados Unidos.
Agentes que se encontraban cerca del lugar abatieron al presunto atacante. Las dos víctimas sobrevivieron a las heridas de bala, …
🇮🇹 Italia: detenido tras un intento de robo y una agresión en Génova
Un hombre de 31 años fue perseguido y golpeado por varias personas en el barrio de Sampierdarena, en Génova, después de que presuntamente intentara arrebatarle una cadena a una mujer.
Según las autoridades, el sospechoso roció gas irritante al acompañante de la víctima cuando este trató de detenerlo. Luego fue retenido por transeúntes y amigos de …
🇹🇭 RAYO CAE EN PLENO PARTIDO: FUTBOLISTA MUERE Y VARIOS RESULTAN HERIDOS EN TAILANDIA
En Narathiwat, Tailandia, un rayo cayó sobre el campo de fútbol el 4 de agosto, justo después de una fuerte lluvia, durante un partido. El jugador del Yala FC, Suphan Awae, de 24 años, murió tras ser alcanzado por la descarga eléctrica. Varias personas resultaron heridas, entre ellas un futbolista de nacionalidad malasia.
☠️ MUERT…
🇲🇽 ASESINADO EN VIVO: INFLUENCER CAYÓ ABATIDO MIENTRAS TRANSMITÍA EN REDES SOCIALES
En el sector Tres Ríos, en Culiacán, Sinaloa (México), el influencer César Gastélum fue asesinado la noche de este martes. De acuerdo con los primeros reportes, fue atacado por sujetos armados mientras realizaba una transmisión en vivo para redes sociales.
☠️ MUERTE OSCURA ☠️
LINK PARA COMPARTIR NOTICIA Y ENTRAR A VERLA ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
h…
🔥😱 | Tragedia en Culiacán: asesinan a balazos al influencer César Gastélum durante transmisión en vivo.
Un violento ataque armado sacudió la ciudad de Culiacán, Sinaloa, tras confirmarse el asesinato del creador de contenido e influencer César Gastélum, quien fue atacado a tiros mientras realizaba una transmisión en vivo en las inmediaciones del Desarrollo Urbano Tres Ríos.
Los hechos ocurrieron alrededor de las 20:…
🇨🇳🏍 Una roca gigante casi aplasta a un auto y a un motociclista en China
Un desprendimiento de rocas sorprendió el lunes a varios conductores en la provincia china de Yunnan. Una enorme piedra se desprendió de la ladera y cayó sobre la carretera, impactando contra un vehículo, mientras que un motociclista que circulaba justo detrás esquivó por muy poco el golpe. No se reportaron heridos ni víctimas fatales.
☠️ MUER…
🤯1😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @muerteoscuraa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,034,058 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MUERTE OSCURA💀” (@muerteoscuraa), 4,294 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/muerteoscuraa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.