Video, posted without a caption
❤4🤯4👍3🤔3

Channel
@mudflood
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,718subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001164680018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mudflood |
| Created | 24 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mudflood |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 1,718 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 1,719 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 1,721 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 1,722 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 1,722 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 16 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
134 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 59 | 44.0% | |
| 🤯 | 30 | 22.4% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 18.7% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 7.46% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.99% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.24% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.49% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.746% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2024 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
❤4🤯4👍3🤔3
The photo of huge clay hill with 20-30 years old trees on top was taken in 1966 in the center of Barnaul. Currently this place is called Sakharova square and the hill was removed couple of years ago to clear the site for the construction of a residential complex. In the replied post you can see what was buried inside this clay hill. Source of the photo: https://t.me/historybarnaul/1903
👍5❤2🤔2🔥1
The photo of the building of the former gymnasium of Mrs. Budkevich, 1980s https://t.me/historybarnaul/1889
🤯5👍3❤1
Moscow, Khokhlovskiy pereulok, 2/1 Looks like at least 1 floor is below ground level. The entrance is cut through in the place of the window
👍13❤7🤯4😁2
A rock-cut tomb was discovered in the village of Ohanavan, in the Kasakh gorge, which, according to preliminary estimates by experts, dates back to the period of V-VII or XII-XIII centuries. It will be studied in detail in the near future. Source: https://am.sputniknews.ru/amp/20240217/otkrytiya-budut-vpechatlyayuschimi-kakaya-usypalnitsa-byla-obnaruzhena-u-sela-oganavan-72407783.html
👍14🤔5🔥3🤯1
Terrestrial globe by Vincenzo Coronelli, 1688 Louvre Abu Dhabi
❤1
Grand Tartaria on the globe
❤7👍4🤯1
Sometimes, looking at such photos, I deliberately look for signs of neural network generation…
👍8🤯4❤3
Fort Zverev, Kronstadt Official version - this place was used as warehouse of flammable materials and there was a fire, the bricks melted. But combustion temperature of fuel oil (350°C) is not sufficient to melt bricks (1200°C).
🤯11👍9👎3👏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mudflood. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mudflood” (@mudflood), 1,718 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mudflood.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.