This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 923–929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 12:34
928
+2
6 Aug 2026, 19:57
926
+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:04
924
no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:02
924
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
99.5%
avg views ÷ 928 subscribers
Avg views / post
923
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (27 December 2025 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
1,846
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
هیچ مسئول درون صندوق، حق بذل و بخشش اموال اعضا، حتی در امور خیر را نداشته و ندارد!
هیچ چشم ناپاک بیرون از صندوق، اجازه چپاول این اموال را ندارد!
حمله ناجوانمردانه مافیای درون و بیرون صندوق و پیشروی آنان سرعت بیش از پیش گرفته است .
متاسفانه امروز شاهد هستیم سنگر به سنگر ،خاکریز به خاکریز، تصرف می شود.
دست فرو بردن در جیب معلمان در روز روشن انجام می گیرد .
آیا این روند دست فرو کردن در جیب معلم، میرنده است یا …
🔴 هشدار برخی از مطالبهگران به ادامه دخالتهای غیرقانونی در صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان
✍️ نقض حریم مالکیت خصوصی اعضا صندوق و خروج دیوان محاسبات از صلاحیتهای قانونی خود
ما به عنوان برخی از مالکان حقیقی صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان، نسبت به اقدامات مداخلهجویانه دیوان محاسبات در امور حسابرسی صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان که مغایر با روح و نص قانون است، مراتب اعتراض خود را اعلام مینماییم.
مصادیق این نقض به این شرح می باشد:
۱. نقد استنا…
#هیات_امنای_غیرقانونی صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان
#تخلف وزیر و رئیس هیات امنا دارد یک ساله می شود
باید هیات امنای جدید بر اساس #اساسنامه اسفند ۱۴۰۳ تعیین شود
تاخیر در برگزاری #انتخابات ترس از ورود شش فرهنگی به هیات امنا است
هر چند مطالبه ما تشکیل #مجمع عمومی و قطع مدیربت دولتی بر صندوق است اما انتخابات گام کوچکی است در آن مسیر.
در ضمن هیات مدیره بویژه مدیرعامل نباید در سایه شرایط جنگی کشور و امنیتی جامعه #ارزش_مالکانه …
#هیات_امنای_غیرقانونی صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان
#تخلف وزیر و رئیس هیات امنا دارد یک ساله می شود
باید هیات امنای جدید بر اساس #اساسنامه اسفند ۱۴۰۳ تعیین شود
تاخیر در برگزاری #انتخابات ترس از ورود شش فرهنگی به هیات امنا است
هر چند مطالبه ما تشکیل #مجمع عمومی و قطع مدیربت دولتی بر صندوق است اما انتخابات گام کوچکی است در آن مسیر.
در ضمن هیات مدیره بویژه مدیرعامل نباید در سایه شرایط جنگی کشور و امنیتی جامعه #ارزش_مالکانه …
« مرا به خير تو اميد نيست شر مرسان ! »
صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان در مسیر بن بست گذشته ... با مدیریت دولت مردان و مجلس نشينان بی حافظه تاريخی ؟!
سعید شهسوارزاده/ عضو شورای نویسندگان صدای معلم
* شوربختانه، بخشي از نمايندگان محترم مجلس، برخي از نهادهاي نظارتي، کميسيون حقوقي رياست جمهوري و ... روند طي شده در دولت ابراهيم رئيسي را فراموش کرده اند و مسیر بن بست گذشته را پيش گرفته اند.
يادآوري مي گردد در دوره رياست هيات امن…
تسهیلگر تحقق ارزشمالکانه باشید
دخالت ممنوع!!!!
✍سعید شهسوارزاده
خاطرات مضرات دخالت دایه های مهربان تر از مادر از ذهن فرهنگیان، به ویژه اعضای محترم صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان،هنوز پاک نشده است که دوباره شاهد این دخالتها هستیم.
همه مطالبهگران با نگاه های متفاوت بر تخصیص حقوق مالکانه اعضا، متفق القول هستند و عبده تبریزی از وزیر اقتصاد می خواهد که با ارفاق،تمام دارایی های یک میلیون و هشتصد هزار عضو را ( با ترکیب کنونی…
#توییت
✍️ حجت اله طالبیان بروجنی در ایکس نوشت:
#اتمام_حجت #فقهی:
طبق استفتا، ادامه مدیریت بر داراییهای #صندوق_ذخیره_فرهنگیان بدون اذن صریح صاحبان اصلی، فاقد مشروعیت و در حکم #غصب و تصرف در #حقالناس است.
و هر گونه تصمیمی بدون #
#رضایت #معلمان، #غیرشرعی است.
#مشروعیت شما به #پایان رسیده ، به #غصب_اموال_فرهنگیان پایان دهید.
https://x.com/i/status/2007934259806470391
@sokhanmoallem
بیانیه گروهی از مطالبهگران حوزه صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان؛
تاکید بر #مطالبهگری #آگاهانه،#هوشمندانه،#مستمر و #منسجم و همسو با #منافع_اعضا
پس از حدود #یک_دهه رصد مستمر حوزه صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان و در آغاز #چهارمین_دهه عمر این موسسه اقتصادی،خوشبختانه یکی از مهمترین اهداف مطالبهگری که #آگاه و #فعال شدن بدنه بوده است تا حدی محقق شده و هم اکنون وارد #مرحله_جدیدی از مطالبهگری در این حوزه شده ایم.
مرحلهای که بیش از گذشته …
برون رفت از بحران صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان و دوگانهی
#اجماع کارشناسان مستقل
یا
#نظرسنجی تودهای؟
#محمد_داوری
در فضایی که #موجی برای #مطالبهگری در حوزه صندوق ذخیره ایجاد شده است،متاسفانه برخی #آگاهانه و برخی #ناآگاهانه و حتی ممکن است خیرخواهانه برای برون رفت از بحران #ناکارآمدی و #نارضایتی در صندوق ذخیره آدرس اشتباه می دهند.
یکی از این آدرسهای اشتباه که به نظر می رسد آگاهانه است و خیرخواهانه هم نیست آدرسی است که حا…
جناب #حاج بابایی ما را به خیر شما امیدی نیست شر مرسان!!!
حاج بابایی که زمانی رئیس هیات امنای صندوق ذخیره بوده و مانند همه روسا و اعضا هیات امنا باید #پاسخگوی عملکرد خود باشد،این روزا بر موج مطالبهگری صندوق ذخیره سوار شده و خواستار ورود مجلس و دولت شده است!!!!
ایشان فراموش کردهاند که #ریشه_ناکارآمدی صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان بویژه در دوره ریاست خود ایشان بر هیات امنا همین ورود و #دخالتهای #مجلسیها و #دولتیها بوده ا…
آیا موافقید که همیشه وزیر آموزش و پرورش ، رئیس هیئت امنای صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان باشد ؟
۱. بله14%
۲. خیر86%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed Amir Khorasani
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mszf1399. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
آیا موافقید که همیشه وزیر آموزش و پرورش ، رئیس هیئت امنای صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان باشد ؟
۱. بله14%
۲. خیر86%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2025 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 961,390 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“صندوق ذخیره فرهنگیان(مطالبهگری)” (@mszf1399), 928 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mszf1399.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.