😁 В Аптекарском огороде нашли растение, которое может охарактеризовать очень неприятных знакомых. Все сразу кого-то вспомнили.
❤26👍12🔥5custom 59090059985630053464🥰2

Channel
@msky_media
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,231,827subscribers
+18,014 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1002425655820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @msky_media |
| Description | развлекательные новости Москвы без занудства и грусти Реклама: @Joe_barbaro_2 Наши каналы: @Scaletta_Agency Работаем с: @swaymedia, @Spiral_Yuri РКН: https://clck.su/UGusV |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/msky_media |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
On 3 of the 47 posts we watched over 30days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0119 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /46277 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC | 27 minutes | 5,550 → 7,660at least +2,100 | 36 → 39at most +4 | +25.1 |
| /466112 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC | 30 minutes | 6,670 → 8,210at least +1,530 | 42 → 44at most +3 | +18.3 |
| /468014 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC | 47 minutes | 5,060 → 7,350at least +2,280 | 44 → 49at most +6 | +27.2 |
Expectedis the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say.It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,231,827 | +857 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 1,230,970 | +3,037 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,227,933 | +3,008 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 1,224,925 | +4,868 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 1,220,057 | -2,668 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 1,222,725 | -760 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 1,223,485 | +3,650 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 1,219,835 | +5,728 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 1,214,107 | +294 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 1,213,813 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:58 | 1,213,813 | first reading |
64 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 64 (3 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,616,830 |
| Reactions total | 21,622 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 39 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 48 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 44of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 5.9 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.2% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 64.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 20,700 views — 1.68% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 24,720).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /470415 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC | 25 minutes – 36 minutes old | 2,850 views ~49 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 14 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /470315 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC | 915 minutes – 5.1 hours old | 8,980 views ~136 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,155 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,670still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 71 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /469715 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC | 1773 seconds – 9.6 hours old | 12,100 views ~227 reactions | 60 minutes: 3,328 interp. → 3.0 hours: 6,490 → 6.0 hours: 9,910still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /469214 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC | 3548 minutes – 23 hours old | 15,600 views ~314 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,336 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,330 → 6.0 hours: 9,070 → 12 hours: 10,100 → 24 hours: 15,600still climbing at last reading | 15,600measured | 3.6 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /469114 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC | 3732 minutes – 24 hours old | 13,600 views ~148 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,330 → 3.0 hours: 7,672 interp. → 6.0 hours: 9,510 → 12 hours: 10,300 → 24 hours: 13,500still climbing at last reading | 13,500measured | 2.2 hours |
| /469014 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC | 384 minutes – 25 hours old | 13,300 views ~264 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,968 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,317 interp. → 6.0 hours: 10,000 → 12 hours: 10,700 → 24 hours: 13,100still climbing at last reading | 13,100measured | 1.8 hours |
| /468114 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC | 4236 minutes – 28 hours old | 15,100 views ~379 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,495 interp. → 3.0 hours: 7,760 → 6.0 hours: 11,400 → 12 hours: 12,900 → 24 hours: 14,600still climbing at last reading | 14,600measured | 3.0 hours |
| /468014 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC | 308 minutes – 24 hours old | 14,800 views ~78 reactions | 60 minutes: 4,477 interp. → 3.0 hours: 8,700 → 6.0 hours: 11,800 → 12 hours: 13,500 → 24 hours: 14,800still climbing at last reading | 14,800measured | 2.1 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
21,197 reactions across 63 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,761 | 46.0% | |
| 🥰 | 2,326 | 11.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2,287 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5384214488809490070 | 2,151 | 10.1% | |
| 👍 | 2,145 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5909005998563005346 | 1,444 | 6.81% | |
| 👏 | 1,083 | 5.11% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjesrcQ3 | 1 | 4 August 2026 | 4 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJz1Yim | 1 | 6 August 2026 | 6 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
😁 В Аптекарском огороде нашли растение, которое может охарактеризовать очень неприятных знакомых. Все сразу кого-то вспомнили.
❤26👍12🔥5custom 59090059985630053464🥰2
🎢 В соцсетях показали, как выглядит заезд на американских горках высотой 27 метров в парке «Сказка» от первого лица. Страшно даже через видео.
❤74👍34custom 538421448880949007015👏13
🪄 Miniso выпустил коллекцию ароматов по мотивам вселенной «Гарри Поттера». Флаконы выглядят как магические склянки с зельями: есть бутылочка с отсылкой к Костеросту, «Жидкая удача» и даже любовное зелье из лавки Уизли. Прикольно сделали!
❤100👍49🔥30🥰22👏18custom 59090059985630053467custom 53842144888094900701
🍯 В кондитерской «Кафе Пушкинъ» ближайшие две недели можно попробовать фисташковый медовик и другие вкусы этого десерта. Всего семь вкусов: • Классика с гречишным мёдом и сгущенкой • Фисташковый и миндальный — ореховые насыщенные десерты. • Апельсиновый и банановый — с характерными фруктовыми нотами и шоколадным послевкусием. • Медовик с малиной — начинён ягодным конфи. Все версии медовиков по специальной цене в че…
🔥112🥰62❤57👏47👍34custom 53842144888094900701custom 59090059985630053461
🐎 Москвичам теперь не нужно искать кассу, чтобы положить деньги на проездной. Сбер добавил для своих клиентов возможность пополнить карту «Тройка» без интернета и мобильного приложения. Для этого нужно отправить на номер 900 СМС со словом «ТРОЙКА», номером транспортной карты и суммой пополнения.
🔥63🥰42👍34❤7custom 53842144888094900702
💁♂️ На жизнь в Москве они просто ещё не накопили.
❤106custom 538421448880949007099🔥33👏10👍9custom 59090059985630053467
🤔 Дизайнеры архитектурного бюро Verlab решили объединить любовь к родным местам с любовью к каламбурам. Так появились забавные значки с названиями московских районов и городов Подмосковья.
❤148👏80👍68🥰50🔥33
Концерт L’ONE, который обещает стать одним из самых атмосферных событий этого лета 📌 15 августа в 19:00 в Зелёном театре Парка Горького — большая московская встреча под открытым небом 🤌🏼 В программе — песни разных лет: от первых больших хитов, которые узнаются с первых секунд, до новых релизов, уже ставших частью этой музыкальной истории. И особенно символично, что артист возвращается на ту же сцену спустя годы. В…
🔥41❤19👏15🥰2custom 53842144888094900701
🦆 Самые стильные уточки с укладкой живут в парке Царицыно — птицы не боятся людей, поэтому их можно разглядеть вблизи. Утиные стилисты знают толк в прическах!
❤105🔥38👍20👏12🥰8custom 53842144888094900704
🧛🏻♂️ Оказаться в Сумерках осенью проще, чем кажется, — локация находится всего в 350 км от Москвы. Уже в конце сентября в Плёсе будет атмосфера будто из вампирской саги — туман, тихие улочки и мистические осенние пейзажи. Планируйте поездку!
🥰104👍33🔥26❤19👏10custom 53842144888094900706custom 59090059985630053465
В Центральном Детском Мире на Лубянке открылся первый бутик эстетичной канцелярии от Bruno Visconti. В честь открытия магазин объявил клиентские дни — до 30 августа вы получаете скидку 20% на первую покупку, а также бесплатную проходку на смотровую площадку за каждый 10-ый чек! Звучит, как отличный повод выгодно подготовиться к школе, универу и возвращению в офис после отпуска😏 📍 ЦДМ, Лубянка 📅 до 30 августа
❤43👏23👍19🔥15🥰5custom 53842144888094900705custom 59090059985630053462
☀️ Тихое солнечное утро в разных уголках Москвы. Лето закончится через 17 дней.
❤148🥰54👏44👍25🔥16custom 59090059985630053465custom 53842144888094900701
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @msky_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@msky_media edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 15,447 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
3 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“moskovsky!” (@msky_media), 1,231,827 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msky_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.