Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Msina soleimani مسینا سلیمانی

Channel

Msina soleimani مسینا سلیمانی

@msinasoleimani

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

153subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001650448392
TypeChannel
Username@msinasoleimani
Descriptionتجربیات جدید خبر های دانشگاه علوم‌ تحقیقات و آموزش های کاربردی Contact: @msina_s سایت: Https://msinasoleimani.ir
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/msinasoleimani

Growth

1537 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 153 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 19:01 — 153 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 22:158 Aug 2026, 19:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:01153no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:15153first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.8%
avg views ÷ 153 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.5
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (30 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total683
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
225
Videos
26
Links
61

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
430.8%
🔥430.8%
🤣323.1%
👍17.69%
💔17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026

المان های ساخته شده توی این مقاله با claude ساخته شده

8 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC16 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

سوالات متدوالی که درباه طراحی سایت با هوش مصنوعی پرسیده می‌شود جدیدا بحث برنامه نویسی و طراحی سایت با هوش مصنوعی خیلی داغه ولی آیا واقعا درسته؟ واقعا کارایی داره؟ با من، مسینا، متخصص هوش مصنوعی و سایت همراه باش تا به تمامی سوالاتی که ممکنه برات پیش بیاد جواب بدیم. در آخر هم اگر سوال یا نظری داشتی برام بذار، حتما میخونم و جواب میدم. قبل از سوالا میخوام یکم شمارو گرم کنم و یک مقدمه ای هوش مصنوعی و سایت ها بگم. احتمال

1🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

یکی از محتوا هایی که با n8n ساختم رفته توی دیسکاور گوگل و ۲۷۵۰۰ تا ایمپرشن و ۸۳۲ تا کلیک گرفته. این یعنی که مقاله بهینه است و گوگل حتی توی دیسکاور نمایشش میگذاره و ورودی بهمون میده

🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

رقابت یعنی تو چقد بتونی مشتریاتو راضی نگه داری و چقد تو جنبه های مختلف برتری داری

2

5 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC32 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

رقابت با چینی‌ها چه کارهایی که نمی‌کنه!!!😂😂 جدیدترین نسخه‌های چت جی‌پی‌تی یعنی نسخه‌های 5.6 وقتی اومدن، قیمتشون نسبتا زیاد بود و چینی‌ها همون مدل رو رایگان و یا با قیمت خیلی خیلی پایین‌تر عرضه کردن 📉🇨🇳 از اون طرف OpenAI دیدن اوضاع خیطه و قیمتشون رقابتی نیست، گفتن عه پس منم قیمتمو میارم پایین که کسی نیاد از چینی استفاده کنه 📉🔥 نتیجه؟؟ قیمت ۵.۶ لونا ۸۰ درصد ارزون شد که این یعنی خیلیییی ارزون کردن و خیلی به صرفه شده

🤣2

29 Jul 2026, 08:32 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

شبیه موج دریاست مثه زندگیمونه بالا پایین داره

👍1

28 Jul 2026, 10:03 UTC71 viewsread 8 August 2026

ایلان ماسک توی مصاحبش دیروز گفته بود که پول داره معنای خودشو از دست میده چون همه چیز رو رباتا میسازن و انسان‌ها نیاز به کار کردن و پول درآوردن ندارن. خیلی عجیبه به کجا خواهیم رسید با این وضعیت 🤔 همکارامو میبینم فکرشون درگیر اینه که میزنن نمیزنن چی میشه. خودمو میبینم چقد محدودیت واسه کارایی که انجام میدم هست. چقد فشله این سیستم 🗑

28 Jul 2026, 10:00 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دقیقا همون دوره ای که هوش مصنوعی تو دنیا داره غوغا میکنه،‌ایران سرورای جدید نمیتونه وارد کنه و درگیر دغدغه جنگه چین و آمریکا توی رقابت شدید هوش مصنوعی با همدیگن و اولویت هر دوتاشون همینه توی ایران قضیه چقدر فرق میکنه؟ هنوز درگیر سنت ها هستیم و بهشون دل بستیم. درگیر اینکه پول چطور در بیاریم که زنده بمونیم!

💔1

26 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC59 viewsread 8 August 2026

خداروشکر مطلب علمیه و تایید شدست زوال عقل میاره دغدغه مالی😂

26 Jul 2026, 18:07 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @DigiatoPhoto

🔹پژوهش بزرگ محققان: دغدغه مالی مداوم می‌تواند مغز شما را زودتر پیر کند 🔺تحقیق جدید نشان می‌دهد که نگرانی مداوم درباره اجاره‌خانه، قبض و هزینه‌های زندگی می‌تواند ساختار فیزیکی مغز شما را تغییر دهد. طبق این مطالعه گسترده و چنددهه‌ای، استرس و مشکلات مالی مداوم در دوران جوانی و میان‌سالی، می‌تواند به روند پیری مغز سرعت ببخشد و خطر ابتلا به زوال عقل و آلزایمر را افزایش دهد. 🔺دانشمندان با بررسی اسکن‌های مغزی دریافتند حجم

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @msinasoleimani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Msina soleimani مسینا سلیمانی” (@msinasoleimani), 153 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msinasoleimani.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.