Channel
@msimonyan_recipes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,362subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001538932479 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @msimonyan_recipes |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/msimonyan_recipes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 11,362 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 11,364 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 11,365 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 11,366 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 11,368 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 11,367 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 11,368 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,374 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,069 | 68.7% | |
| ❤ | 1,108 | 15.0% | |
| 🔥 | 829 | 11.2% | |
| 😁 | 126 | 1.71% | |
| 🤔 | 115 | 1.56% | |
| 👏 | 82 | 1.11% | |
| 🤩 | 23 | 0.312% | |
| 🏆 | 19 | 0.258% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.027% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.014% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,374reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2023 to 17 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сейчас в Telegram развелось много фейковых каналов. Некоторые ведут от моего имени, активно их рекламируют и проводят сборы якобы на спецоперацию. Еще раз напомню: никаких сборов на фронт не веду — помогаю сама. Ни в каких дебатах с Гордоном и Кличко я никогда не участвовала — это вранье. Пожалуйста, будьте бдительны и осторожны и не подписывайтесь на мошенников!
👍761❤120🤔29😁17🔥15👏5🤩3
Вкуснейшее праздничное блюдо — запеченная баранья нога. И очень просто ее готовить. Ногу я солю, перчу, обкладываю чесноком, розмарином и тимьяном. В противень подливаю нашего домашнего красного вина. Можно использовать любое недорогое вино — красное или белое. Можно и вообще без вина — подлить водичку. И все. Запекаем в духовке при 180 градусах, пока не увидим вот такую красивую корочку. #мясо #баранина #горячее…
👍606🔥89❤78👏19🏆6😁3🤔2🤩2
Один из моих любимых супов — нью-ингланд клэм чаудер. В той части Америки, где я училась, его делают в любой придорожной забегаловке, как у нас солянку. Приготовить его в России довольно сложно, потому что нет ключевого ингредиента — сока ракушек вонголе. Но вонголе в супе легко заменить почти любыми морепродуктами (креветки, мидии, гребешки) или даже любой белой морской рыбой и рыбным бульоном. Получится почти то …
👍341❤59🤔44🔥16😁9
Продолжаю постить, как мы готовили меню обедов Путина и Си. От печорской нельмы, скажу я вам, даже я не могла оторваться. А я вообще-то давно привыкла ооооочень мало есть. Сначала я сделала овощи. Вдохновленная костромской кухней (полистайте, выше я описывала эту роскошь), я натерла на крупной терке корень сельдерея и пастернак, залила их сливками и томила в горшочке до мягкости и вкусноты. Нельму купила в интерне…
👍531😁95❤70🔥20🤩9🥰1
Решили приготовить с детьми домашнюю лазанью. Начнем с соуса болоньезе. Пропускаем через мясорубку одну морковку, два стебля сельдерея, две луковицы и три зубчика чеснока. Пассеруем овощи в кастрюле. Сюда же отправляем говяжий фарш (я в этот раз купила готовый). Тушим все вместе некоторое время, а потом заливаем томатным пюре. Перемешиваем и солим по вкусу. Некоторые фарш жарят, но, как по мне, в этом случае он по…
👍691❤91🔥53👏10🤔5🏆3🤩3
Вот простой рецепт домашнего медовика. В кастрюлю с толстым дном кладем 300 г сливочного масла, 180 г сахара и 4 столовые ложки меда. Ставим на плиту на средний огонь. Масса должна стать однородной. Добавляем 2 чайные ложки соды и перемешиваем. Масса будет пениться и увеличиваться в об'еме. Продолжаем мешать, чтобы ничего не пригорало. Снимаем с плиты и даем немного остыть. Через 15 минут вмешиваем 4 яйца по одном…
👍644❤115👏25🔥20🤩5😍2🏆1🤔1
Пирожки мы делаем, чтобы не выкидывать остатки того, что жарили на мангале. Все, что вчера не доели, перемалываем и обжариваем с луком — это наша начинка. Мясо, рыба, картошка — что угодно. ⠀ Для теста слегка нагреваем 200 мл молока и 100 мл сливок любой жирности, добавляем туда ложку сахара и быстродействующие дрожжи — количество можно определить на упаковке. ⠀ Оставляем на 15 минут, чтобы появилась шапка. ⠀ Затем …
🔥385👍217❤80🏆4🤔3🤩1😁1
Оливки замариновали с апельсиновой цедрой, мятой, зирой, корицей и оливковым маслом. Получилась отличная пряная закуска. #оливки #закуски @msimonyan_recipes
👍339🔥43🤔23❤22
Приготовили расстегаи, как у Начальника. Сначала делаем тесто. В миску наливаем 150 мл теплого молока или воды, туда добавляем 10 г прессованных дрожжей и 20 г сахара, размешиваем до растворения сахара. Туда же кладем одно яйцо, размешиваем. Потом всыпаем 300 г муки и 1/2 ч. л. соли. Замешиваем тесто. Когда оно соберется в комок и будет немного липнуть к рукам, добавляем в него постепенно 35 г сливочного масла комн…
❤418👍263🔥51👏3😁1
Повторили еще одно меню со встречи Начальника и Си. Как вам?
👍676🔥137❤55👏20🤔8🏆5
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @msimonyan_recipes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,172,893 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маргарита Симоньян. Рецепты” (@msimonyan_recipes), 11,362 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msimonyan_recipes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.