Here you are guys, good luck with these amazing files, just give some attention to my efforts, hit some buttons and I will continue my job
🔥17❤1👍1

Channel
@msdc_sat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,184subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001266403797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @msdc_sat |
| Description | Видео лекции и разборы задач. Объяснение тем. Мотивационные посты. Наши соц.сети и запись на курсы: https://taplink.cc/msdc Официальный чат группы https://t.me/+GUFIhZUVVD41YmQ6 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/msdc_sat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 5,184 | +67 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 5,117 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 5,112 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:09 | 5,112 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (1 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 14,416 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
112 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 70 | 62.5% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 25.0% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| 🗿 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @msdc_sat. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Here you are guys, good luck with these amazing files, just give some attention to my efforts, hit some buttons and I will continue my job
🔥17❤1👍1
Немного слов, которые мы узнали на недавних уроках. Почему бы не поделиться ими с вами, друзья
❤7
Кстати, вот вам домашка на Риддинг. Статья из NY Times. Все схемы как на ладони. По инсайдерской информации, КБ готовит ответный ход. Тех кто будет уличен, ждут суровые проблемы. ФБР достанет их везде. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/28/us/politics/sat-college-board-cheating.html Домашка: The student wants to identify main idea of the article, which choice would most reasonably completes the text.
🔥2
Подчищая комментарии родилась идея для скама: 1) Предлагаешь лики от августовского SAT 2) Берешь небольшую предоплату 3) Исчезаешь Навряд ли кто то будет на тебя жаловаться. P.S. Берите лики только у проверенного поставщика P.S.S. Списывать - плохо! Я бы даже сказал недопустимо! А вы как думаете?
🗿5❤3👏2
Ты вышел на уровень 1500 и хочешь улучшиться? Тут нужно погружаться отдельно. Нужно рассмотреть твою ситуацию, ведь влияет множество факторов: 1) любимые/нелюбимые вопросы 2) концентрация 3) скорость 4) выносливость 5) удача Запишись на 1-2 индивидуальных урока, преподаватель подскажет тебе что нужно в твоем случае: https://msdc.s20.online/common/2/lead/create?gid=644 Эта ссыдка приведет тебя в нужном направлени…
🔥1
Народ, кто пришел сюда посмотрев этот рилз: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbntTqWzmfx/?igsh=cWlyc3RlMmRvM3Zy Добро пожаловать! Всем олдам - отдельный респект!
👍5
💎 Категория 4: 1400+ Если твой результат уже 1400+, то сначала хочу сказать одну вещь. 👏 Ты уже проделал огромную работу. Большинство учеников никогда не доходят до этого уровня. Но если твоя цель — 1500+, 1550+ или даже 1600, то начинается совсем другая игра. Теперь ты уже не борешься с незнанием материала. Ты борешься за каждый балл. 🤔 Почему так сложно? Потому что сейчас тебя отделяют от мечты всего нескол…
❤1
Гайз, если кто-то искал хорошие курсы IELTS, SAT and NUET: В центре MSDC стартанул 3 поток летних групп. Еще можно записаться. https://msdc.s20.online/common/2/lead/create?gid=644 Заполни, с тобой свяжутся. Каждому записавшемуся будут плюшки.
❤1
🔥 Категория 3: 1300–1400 Если твой результат уже 1300–1400, то поздравляю. 👏 Ты уже входишь в число сильных учеников. Но именно здесь начинается самый сложный этап подготовки. Потому что подняться с 900 до 1200 гораздо проще, чем с 1350 до 1500. Почему? 🤔 Потому что теперь каждая ошибка становится очень дорогой. Ты уже знаешь почти все темы. Но продолжаешь терять баллы из-за мелочей. Вот самые частые причины…
❤5
Just surfed the net and found some november 25 sat leaks. Give some light and i will go on!
❤17
🎯 Категория 2: 1100–1300 Если твой пробный результат 1100–1300, то у меня для тебя хорошая новость. 👇 Ты уже не новичок. Скорее всего, ты понимаешь формат экзамена, умеешь решать большую часть базовых задач и даже иногда получаешь сложные вопросы правильно. Но именно здесь застревает огромное количество учеников. 📉 ❓Почему? Потому что дальше уже недостаточно просто решать побольше вариантов. Нужно понять, что …
❤9
Тебе нужен сертификат SAT для поступления в 2027 году? С чего начать? Я разделю тех, кто будет сдавать на 4 категории: • ниже 1100 • 1100-1300 • 1300-1400 • 1400+ Нужно определиться в какой ты категории! Напиши пробный тест, лучше всего на это потратить одну попытку из блубук. Написал. Понял. Ты в первой категории! Страшно? Мало времени? Боишься что не успеешь? Вот что делай! Пройди курс на Хан Академии, Проштуди…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @msdc_sat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 240,986 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Digital SAT, Поступление, Гранты 📝 вместе” (@msdc_sat), 5,184 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msdc_sat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.