Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Samoilina life

Channel

Samoilina life

@msamoilina2022

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,131subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001767333390
TypeChannel
Username@msamoilina2022
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/msamoilina2022

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1301,1351,132.57 August 2026 — 1,132 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,132 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,134 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,135 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,132 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,133 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,130 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,131 subscribers1,1317 August 202616 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 40 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,129–1,136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:201,131+1
12 Sept 2026, 19:591,130-3
3 Sept 2026, 10:471,133+2
30 Aug 2026, 20:141,131-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:281,132+1
24 Aug 2026, 18:231,131-4
17 Aug 2026, 09:271,135+1
10 Aug 2026, 17:451,134+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:481,132no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:111,132first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

266 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7026.3%
5621.1%
❤‍🔥5520.7%
😁3111.7%
👍238.65%
93.38%
💯83.01%
🤣51.88%
🤝31.13%
😍20.752%
👀10.376%
👏10.376%
🗿10.376%
🦄10.376%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 13 we hold a reading for · 62%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @msamoilina2022. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC284 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

История, которая привела меня к диванным рассуждениям о бытие) Рассказало мне тут одно креативное агентство про свой внутренний эксперимент: На неделю полностью отказать от использования ИИ. Результат ёмкий: работа встала, особенно у джунов. Какие тут выводы можно сделать ай донт ноу 🤷🏼‍♀️. Могу только порассуждать в слух и размножить вопросы без ответа: • ИИ засасывает • Может в этом и нет ничего такого. В к

❤‍🔥10🔥98

30 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC343 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥14103

29 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC384 views29 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Размышления о ЦА Плох тот подрядчик, который хотя бы раз не предложил нам «поработать с зумерами». Это предложение часто попытка расширения миллениальского ядра аудитории. Мы никого не осуждаем, ведь : • зумеры легче ведутся на все диджитал и SMM каналы коммуникации • они легко дают охваты • они дольше будут жить - факт • и коронное «они вырастут и будут помнить вашу рекламу и у вас купят» (сомнительно, но окей)

12👍11🔥5💯1

29 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC360 views28 reactions5 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тест не пройден))

😁22🤣5🗿1

28 Jul 2026, 16:08 UTC376 views15 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я тут усердно читала весь июль) Сейчас стараюсь соблюдать пропорцию: 4 художки на 1 нон-фикшн. Художественную литературу в этом блоге как-то не жалуют, поэтому ловите … «Накопительный эффект» Водичка, конечно же имеется, как и на 100 раз сказанных истин, но на меня оказала целительный эффект. Книга вдохновляет, фокусирует на важном, делает меня лучше) Рекомендую ♥️

8🔥4🤝3

16 Jul 2026, 10:51 UTC529 views35 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Заметочка Тренд: Теперь люди доверяют ИИ больше чем блогерам.* Развитие тренда: в Москве есть агентство недвижимости, которое создало свою ИИшку для клиентов. Покупатель общается с AI как с обычным GPT и программа выдает ему по-настоящему релевантные запросу варианты. Агент на стадии подбора из общения практически исключен. Таким образом агентство как будто бы гарантирует отсутствие личного отношения и интереса

🔥22👍84👀1

14 Jul 2026, 13:34 UTC504 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Традиционная забава: оооочень сильно беспокоиться за День строителя. Что необходимо чтобы сильно беспокоиться за день строителя: 1. Поменять концепцию за месяц 2. Поменять бюджет за месяц 3. Сделать сложнокомпонентную концепцию 4. Сделать ставку на творческих людей (это всегда 50% успеха и 50% тотальной неопределенности) Что вы можете сделать, чтобы помочь мне с днем строителя? Пройти этот опрос Что я решила сде

11❤‍🔥6😁4👏1🔥1

7 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC529 views19 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давно не было дорогого дневничка) Дорогой дневничок, если бы не отпуск, я бы вздернулась))) хорошо что он был, после него всё не сложно, а интересно ♥️ Команда: 1. Увидела что такое вдохновленный работой зумер. Это прекрасно. Можно работать) 2. Кайфую от того как взаимодействуют между собой лидеры направлений. Я там иногда вообще не нужна. Только посмотреть и поохать-порадоваться за результат) 3. Ищем бренд-марке

🔥8❤‍🔥62😍2🦄1

7 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vs_online_ru

Если читать сухие релизы про успешный успех временно не хочется, это не значит, что нужно отказываться от бизнес-контента. Подборка уральских личных каналов о маркетинге и бизнесе с честными инсайтами. 🤩 VS-online.ru — ваш главный проводник в мир уральского глянца, светской жизни и стиля Екатеринбурга. Фитина печатает... — экспертиза маркетинга региона от директора АКАР Урал и руководителя по продвижению девелопер

❤‍🔥21👍1

3 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC437 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

В VS-online вышло моё интервью про ChatGPT ☝🏻 Я вообще на эти темы разговариваю с огромным удовольствием. Там все правильно написано, но сейчас мы с Ямайкой продвинулись еще дальше…даже сильно поссорились и не разговаривали, но потом помирились. Люблю я это всё, если знаете где что почитать чтобы двигаться еще продуктивнее, советуйте- не стесняйтесь)

😁53❤‍🔥3💯2

3 Jul 2026, 13:17 UTC431 views17 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vs_online_ruPhoto

Интересно, как выросло бы население Екатеринбурга, если бы к жителям при переписи добавили ИИ-агентов, с которыми они общаются? Искусственый интеллект занял место бизнес-ассистента, психолога, даже тренера. Директор по маркетингу BAZA DEVELOPMENT Мария Самойлина поделилась своим ИИ-опытом. «Есть соблазн обсуждать с ним каждый свой шаг и начать воспринимать его как живого человека» 🚮Полный текст — по ссылке (чтобы

🔥7❤‍🔥5👍32

2 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC464 views17 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Хочется поговорить про печатные СМИ… Но всегда останавливает глубокое уважение к людям, которые этим занимаются. Вчера на одном мероприятии затронули эту тему хочу поделиться мыслями. Личное Факт существования печатных СМИ, меня как человека радует, успокаивает. Я хочу чтобы они были. Профессиональное Почему мы не идем в принт: 1. Нет возможности оцифровать результат 2. Слабая работа QR-кодов 3. Если есть теле

🔥10❤‍🔥3💯31

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @msamoilina2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Чойс Екатеринбург
@choiceekb · 23,065
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 September 2026
Ксюша Кожина
@visuology · 23,671
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 17 September 2026
Мельников в городе
@MelnikovEKB · 25,793
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Samoilina life” (@msamoilina2022), 1,131 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/msamoilina2022.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.