Amazing Reviews from Students β€οΈβ€οΈ Thank you for Trusting Best Lecs of India π₯π₯
β€4π1π₯1

Channel
@mrugeshmadlani
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
14,375subscribers
-161 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001461962481 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mrugeshmadlani |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mrugeshmadlani |
Education β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:06 | 14,375 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 14,389 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:07 | 14,398 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:28 | 14,406 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:31 | 14,416 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:40 | 14,424 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:27 | 14,432 | -15 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 14,447 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:05 | 14,455 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:09 | 14,463 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 14,469 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:29 | 14,477 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:37 | 14,481 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:18 | 14,495 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 12:28 | 14,506 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 11:30 | 14,532 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 14,533 | -11 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 14,544 | -8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 03:58 | 14,552 | -7 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 14,559 | first reading |
52 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 52 (5 July 2026 β 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,708 |
| Reactions total | 158 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 05:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
770 reactions across 52 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 528 | 68.6% | |
| π | 90 | 11.7% | |
| π₯ | 70 | 9.09% | |
| π | 46 | 5.97% | |
| π± | 19 | 2.47% | |
| π₯° | 7 | 0.909% | |
| π | 5 | 0.649% | |
| π― | 3 | 0.39% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 1 | 0.13% | |
| π€© | 1 | 0.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 5 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Amazing Reviews from Students β€οΈβ€οΈ Thank you for Trusting Best Lecs of India π₯π₯
β€4π1π₯1
Happy Dhanteras πͺπͺ May this Festival bring Lots & Lots of Best Wishes into Your & Your Family Lives ππ Gold and silver shine bright, but the golden three letters 'CA' before your name will shine the brightest π₯π₯ May Goddess Lakshmi and Lord Kubera bless your study desk with focus, retention, and ultimate success ππ
β€10π2π₯1π1
BIGGEST Exam Sale π₯π₯π₯ Avail Indiaβs World Class Lecs of FM SM & Audit only at ADMIN COST β β β Donβt Just Study, Fall in Love with Practical Reality of Subjects ππ All Prices are inclusive of Coloured Books Set β€οΈβ€οΈ Offer Valid till Diwali Only π₯ Make Best use of it ππ
π2π₯2β€1π1
Live Now on YouTube π₯π₯
β€4π1π₯1π1
Master Plan to Clear CA Inter Group 2 π₯π₯π₯ From Fail to Exemption π Letβs Make Janβ27 Last Attempt ππ https://youtu.be/JoLLBsSZYVI?si=hA6nhDwI6ZUTvY4o
β€3π1π₯1π1
CA Foundation Results During Diwali β€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈβ€οΈ
π3β€2π₯1π1
Believe & Work Extremely Hard - Everything will Happen πππ
β€8π2π₯1
Avail the Best Lecs of India at Loweeeesssttt Ever Prices β€οΈ Yes, Due to New Syllabus - We want everyone should clear π Hence we are offering Lecs at Admin Cost only ππ Offer Valid for Limited Time Only π Donβt Forget to use Promo Code - LASTATTEMPT
β€3π1π₯1π1
Live Now on Youtube π₯π₯π₯
β€2π1π₯1π1
Must Do Topics - Auditing & Ethics - Janβ26 Attemptπ₯π₯ These is Prepared After Lots of Analysis of Past Attempt Papers ππ Make Best use of it & Share with your Friends too πππ https://youtu.be/hl-91GwJ5Bo?si=CqxB5Q24cctEgYhI
π₯2β€1π1π1
Be an eternal Optimist & 90 % of problems which you think matter, wonβt even matter in 3 yrs from now πππ
β€15π2π₯1π1
New Syllabus Coming Soon π¬π¬π¬ Letβs make Jan 2027 Your Last Attempt πππ We have a Amazing Gift for you ππ Watch this Youtube Short π https://youtube.com/shorts/pX8QQtL3evY?si=uinPMFjsAJKuJhfL
β€4π₯2π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @mrugeshmadlani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βMrugesh Madlani Virtuals ππ₯π₯β β (@mrugeshmadlani), 14,375 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrugeshmadlani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.