Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 柬埔寨新闻/亚太曝光 /缅甸战争新闻 |金三角新闻

Channel

柬埔寨新闻/亚太曝光 /缅甸战争新闻 |金三角新闻

@mrtt001_1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11,819subscribers

+9,841 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002308070327
TypeChannel
Username@mrtt001_1
Description缅北每天新闻)官方频道 @ask112200 缅甸每天新闻)官方频道 @mrtt001_1 缅北每天吃瓜)官方频道 @zmxw12_2 每天免费观看)官方频道 @mrtt001_mrtt001 欢迎咨询投稿爆料: @wdtv00 正规实体赌场)官方频道 @nanchangxiuchehz 欢迎咨询官方客服 @VH989
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrtt001_1

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ask112200/300458 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC@mrtt001_1/28728 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@ask112200/3022111 Nov 2026, 02:31 UTC@mrtt001_1/28916 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 02:32 UTC1.00under a minute
@ask112200/3024611 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC@mrtt001_1/28941 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC1.00under a minute
@ask112200/3030912 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC@mrtt001_1/29028 · this entry12 Nov 2026, 11:18 UTC1.00under a minute
@ask112200/3031012 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC@mrtt001_1/29029 · this entry12 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@zmxw12_2/229888 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC@mrtt001_1/22982 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ask11220047 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@ask112200 (46–1)
@zmxw12_227 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (18–9)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 50 of the 50 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 74 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @ask112200. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

1,80111,8396,8208 August 2026 — 1,978 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,978 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,964 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,962 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,957 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,954 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,946 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,941 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,935 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,926 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,915 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,903 subscribers30 September 2026 — 1,870 subscribers6 October 2026 — 1,856 subscribers13 October 2026 — 1,852 subscribers16 October 2026 — 1,848 subscribers19 October 2026 — 1,842 subscribers22 October 2026 — 1,836 subscribers26 October 2026 — 1,830 subscribers29 October 2026 — 1,823 subscribers1 November 2026 — 1,815 subscribers4 November 2026 — 1,801 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,839 subscribers9 November 2026 — 11,827 subscribers10 November 2026 — 11,823 subscribers12 November 2026 — 11,819 subscribers11,8198 August 202612 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +9,841. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 295–13,345 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 12:0011,819-4
10 Nov 2026, 13:0511,823-4
9 Nov 2026, 02:1011,827-12
7 Nov 2026, 22:0511,839+10,038
4 Nov 2026, 16:591,801-14
1 Nov 2026, 11:171,815-8
29 Oct 2026, 05:091,823-7
26 Oct 2026, 01:411,830-6
22 Oct 2026, 22:411,836-6
19 Oct 2026, 15:361,842-6
16 Oct 2026, 07:091,848-4
13 Oct 2026, 02:501,852-4
6 Oct 2026, 21:221,856-14
30 Sept 2026, 01:581,870-33
16 Sept 2026, 02:201,903-12
11 Sept 2026, 23:001,915-11
7 Sept 2026, 07:171,926-9
2 Sept 2026, 18:061,935-6
30 Aug 2026, 18:041,941-5
28 Aug 2026, 02:461,946first reading

Engagement

93 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.221%
avg views ÷ 11,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
26.2
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 93 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held93 (8 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total2,171
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈19,300
Videos
≈9,370
Links
≈7,330

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 08m
Average length
1m 51s

Measured directly from 37 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1083.3%
❤216.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 93 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 93 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 30 of 83 posts held from the last 30 days (36.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC20 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @nanchangxiuchehzVideo

😃⚡⚡⚡ ❤️‍🩹❣️💞💗💖💘💝 欧亚国际实体赌场 经营【百家乐】【龙虎】【牛牛】【三公】公平公正公开 资金安全大额无忧 全天支持办理上下分 USDT 支付宝 微信 银行卡 缅甸 KBZ 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首充赠送10%的彩金 😣 会员流水每天早上8点结算 会员返点每个月一号结算 🥇新客人充值2万块 直接提款30多万📣 ➡️ 玩家70块爆到15000 永胜电子 牛逼 👈 🎉大哥10万下注记录 当天赢走30多万 😃 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @nanchangxiuchehz ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @QN898 :@VN989 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @QI898 :@VE898 🏴😧😧 @VH989 - @RG929 - @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC18 viewsread 13 November 2026
Forwarded from @htetwaiyan2568Photo

给玩家下分,认准本人浩气爆分主线 微信、支付宝、银行卡充值 500 起步。缅甸 KBZ 充值 10 万起步。USDT 充值 10 起步 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 首充赠送10%的彩金 😣 会员流水每天早上8点结算 会员返点每个月一号结算 🥇新客人充值2万块 直接提款30多万📣 ➡️ 玩家70块爆到15000 永胜电子 牛逼 👈 🎉大哥10万下注记录 当天赢走30多万 😃 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @nanchangxiuchehz ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @QN898 :@VN989 ⚡⚡⚡⚡ @QI898 :@VE898 🏴😧😧 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:37 UTC37 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸总统吴敏昂莱会见泰国副总理 讨论和平进程与多领域合作 今日下午,缅甸国家总统吴敏昂莱在内比都总统接待厅会见由泰国副总理兼外交部长Sihasak Phuangketkeow率领的代表团。 双方就深化缅泰友好合作、促进东盟成员国间积极合作交换意见,并讨论了打击网络诈骗与网络赌博、边境安全、贸易促进、环保与能源合作,以及缅甸国内和平进程等议题。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:33 UTC26 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#缅军莫宁县炮击村庄 KIA提醒民众注意安全 据KIA方面11月11日消息,驻扎在克钦邦与实皆省交界莫宁县南西昂村的缅军,近日对周边彬弄、曼海等村庄肆意炮击。 11月7日KIA与PDF联合部队袭击南西昂基地后,缅军持续调动兵力并炮击周边地区,有关方面已提醒民众提高警惕。 11月4日至8日,联合部队还攻占因多—莫卢之间三处缅军据点。军方正向曼德勒—密支那公路沿线增兵,但在联合部队抵抗下持续受挫。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC25 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#据当地居民消息,因持续降雨,掸邦南部良瑞镇区和茵莱地区洪灾恶化。良瑞镇约半数区域被淹,部分地点水位涨至房屋二楼,民众急需援助。 11月12日下午,茵莱湖水位上涨约7英尺,Phaung Daw Oo佛塔前桥梁几乎全淹。上游水流、东部山洪及瑞娘来水汇合,全镇成汪洋。8个街区中7个被淹,5个更严重。镇西大量居民撤离,暂居寺庙、救灾营地和亲友家。 救援组织人手不足,难以及时到达所有需帮助者。部分地区停电,电话线路中断。茵莱地区部分村庄水位涨至房屋底层,救灾船只缺汽油。一名公益成员称,机械船大多没油,运输能力不足,需排查转移留下的老人和病患。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:30 UTC14 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#缅甸军方国防预算突破1万亿缅元,创政变以来新高 缅甸军方申请追加2026—2027财年国防预算超过2,500亿缅元,使国防开支突破1万亿缅元,创2021年军事政变以来新高。 根据11月5日提交的财政报告,军方原获批国防预算超过7,900亿缅元,此次追加预算主要反映其持续扩大军事开支的趋势。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC13 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#中国男子追赶偷油贼遭枪杀,柬警方抓获9人 11月9日,柬埔寨实居省一名35岁中国男子在骑摩托车追赶涉嫌偷油人员时,遭对方开枪击中胸部,当场身亡。 警方随后展开跨省追捕,截至11月11日共逮捕9名嫌疑人,并查获一把手枪及5发子弹。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:28 UTC13 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#敏昂莱之子被指强占仰光体育场周边商铺 缅甸媒体报道称,仰光北德贡镇区第35街区足球场旁的35间商铺,遭军方当局下令限期拆除,要求商户于2026年11月底前搬迁。 据悉,相关商铺均与市政部门签订了正式租赁合同。当地消息称,此次清场疑与敏昂莱之子昂比梭(Aung Pyae Sone)计划开发体育场项目有关。 今年7月,仰光昂山体育场周边商铺也曾以升级改造为由遭强制拆除,商户未获重新安置。 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC13 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#世界另一个“中国”?缅甸佤邦的“中国化”生存之道 结语 佤邦这个“世界上另一个中国”,不是谁刻意打造的“样板间”,而是一群因历史原因留在边境线上的人,为了活得更好、更安全,一砖一瓦建起来的生存奇迹。他们说中文、花人民币、读中国书,不是为了变成谁,只是为了守住自己的家 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:24 UTC13 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#寻人启事 #欠钱不还 兄弟,你还活着吗?听说你在亚太挨打了,不知道有没有把你打死?没有打死的话,记得联系我哦,你欠我的钱还没还呢。 还记得之前你骗人家的介绍费嘛,当年的你挺厉害的,不知道现在是否活着? 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

13 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC12 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

网恋女友翻车的 #见网友 #翻车 东南亚导航频道 @RG929 @MC929

12 Nov 2026, 13:53 UTC27 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @nanchangxiuchehzVideo

😍请认准公司官网 其余网址均为假冒网站 电脑 手机通用😅 欧亚国际😇 官方网址: www.5553318.com 注册网址: 点击这里自己可以注册账号 永胜娱乐📱📱 邀请码: P3325KW 官方网址: yongsheng2026.com APP下载: app.yongsheng2026.com 新葡京娱乐😀 官方网址: 8882378.XYZ 官方网址: 8882378.vip 环球娱乐😀 官方网址: www.22201522.com 注册网址: 环球注册网址 利澳娱乐😇 官方网址: www.9992219.com 官方网址: www.9992289.com 皇家国际😎 官方网址: www.bx111.net 官方网址: www.bx2222.net 官方网址: www.hj812.vip 邮箱账号: 8888 邮箱密码: 8888

Showing the 12 most recent of 93 posts we hold for @mrtt001_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“柬埔寨新闻/亚太曝光 /缅甸战争新闻 |金三角新闻” (@mrtt001_1), 11,819 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrtt001_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.